<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<br>
<br>
Milton L Mueller wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:75822E125BCB994F8446858C4B19F0D77B22098C@SUEX07-MBX-04.ad.syr.edu"
type="cite">
<title>Re: [governance] JPA</title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; ">
<meta content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.3527" name="GENERATOR">
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><font size="4"><font
face="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span
style="font-size: 11pt;"><span class="775500814-27052009"><font
color="#0000ff" face="Arial" size="2">></font></span> I also think
that suggesting an 'international judidical body' <span
class="775500814-27052009"><font color="#0000ff" face="Arial" size="2"> </font></span></span></font></font></div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><font size="4"><font
face="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span
style="font-size: 11pt;"><span class="775500814-27052009"><font
color="#0000ff" face="Arial" size="2">></font> </span>for
adjudication CIR/ related IG issues as a more urgent step <span
class="775500814-27052009"><font color="#0000ff" face="Arial" size="2"> </font></span></span></font></font></div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><font size="4"><font
face="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span
style="font-size: 11pt;"><span class="775500814-27052009"><font
color="#0000ff" face="Arial" size="2">></font> </span>would be
useful, since a full treaty process could take long <span
class="775500814-27052009"><font color="#0000ff" face="Arial" size="2"> </font></span></span></font></font></div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><font size="4"><font
face="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span
style="font-size: 11pt;"><span class="775500814-27052009"><font
color="#0000ff" face="Arial" size="2">></font> </span>time. The
model and legal basis for such a judicial or quasi-<span
class="775500814-27052009"><font color="#0000ff" face="Arial" size="2"> </font></span></span></font></font></div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><font size="4"><font
face="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span
style="font-size: 11pt;"><span class="775500814-27052009"><font
color="#0000ff" face="Arial" size="2">></font> </span>judicial body
can be discussed. , <span class="775500814-27052009"><font
color="#0000ff" face="Arial" size="2"> </font></span></span></font></font></div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><font size="4"><font
face="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span
style="font-size: 11pt;"><span class="775500814-27052009"></span></span></font></font> </div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><font size="4"><font
face="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span
style="font-size: 11pt;"><span class="775500814-27052009"><font
color="#0000ff" face="Arial" size="2">Same issue as my last message. </font></span></span></font></font></div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><font size="4"><font
face="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span
style="font-size: 11pt;"><span class="775500814-27052009"><font
color="#0000ff" face="Arial" size="2">What rules/law does this
quasi-judicial body apply? Without that, it's useless second-guess or a
dangerous political bypass mechanism.</font></span></span></font></font></div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><font size="4"><font
face="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span
style="font-size: 11pt;"><span class="775500814-27052009"><font
color="#0000ff" face="Arial" size="2">We've tried to skip that stage
for 10- years and it hasn't worked. Let's get down to it. </font> </span><br>
<br>
</span></font></font></div>
</blockquote>
Milton <br>
<br>
I have always clearly stated my preference for a global system of
policies and rules in IG - legitimately arrived at. You know that from
our work on framework convention DC and then also the effort to get
enhanced cooperation thing out of the closets. However, a statement of
an ideal and desired state is hardly enough. And here I was trying to
see if Ginger's and Ian's effort to get a caucus statement can roll
forward.<br>
<br>
One needs to go into fuzzy areas as we practice real politik and
negotiate the way forward. It is in this regard such proposals as a
judicial or quasi-judicial body is being floated. It is proposed to be
done at the same time as some kind of movement is shaped towards a
treaty process. Your email response to Jeanette relates in detail your
position on what is the desirable state, which, as you know, I
completely agree with. But we also need to contribute effort on seeing
how we can actually move towards that state. It is this respect I
proposed this interim stage. Among others it also has the benefit of
being a part of recent set of proposals by Commissioner Reding. <br>
<br>
As for it becoming a '<font size="4"><font
face="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span
style="font-size: 11pt;"><span class="775500814-27052009"><font
color="#0000ff" face="Arial" size="2">useless second-guess or a
dangerous political bypass mechanism' <big><font color="#000000">the
problem remains, but I think a quasi-judicial panel can be provided
better safeguards against this problem than the present GAC. And the
treaty process should in any case start moving.<br>
<br>
If you just propose - ' renew the JPA till we have a treaty', many
would read it as just 'renew the JPA, dont let it lapse'. We need to
push the process forward, and I am open to suggestions.<br>
<br>
parminder <br>
</font></big></font></span></span></font></font><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>