<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.5764" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=359443922-18042009><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>Folks, its probably because we are too busy with other
things, but we dont seem to have a firm proposal here and we are 48 hours from
deadline. Milton, I would encourage you to submit this but I dont think we can
get full IGC endorsement in the limited time available</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV class=Section1>
<P class=MsoAutoSig align=left>Ian Peter</P>
<P class=MsoAutoSig>PO Box 429</P>
<P class=MsoAutoSig>Bangalow NSW 2479</P>
<P class=MsoAutoSig>Australia</P>
<P class=MsoAutoSig>Tel (+614) 1966 7772 or (+612) 6687 0773</P>
<P class=MsoAutoSig>www.ianpeter.com</P>
<P class=MsoAutoSig><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </P>
<P class=MsoAutoSig><?xml:namespace prefix = o ns =
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p> </o:p></P></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> Parminder
[mailto:parminder@itforchange.net] <BR><B>Sent:</B> 16 April 2009
13:33<BR><B>To:</B> governance@lists.cpsr.org; Milton L
Mueller<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: [governance] NN Workshop
proposal<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV><BR>Thanks Milton for this.<BR><BR>Some comments<BR><PRE wrap=""><BIG><FONT face="Times New Roman, Times, serif">>While focused on national regulatory developments, it will try to assess the transnational implications of various >approaches to NN and in particular examine how >consensus in the developed world might affect infrastructure development in >middle income and developing countries. Relates to theme -
>Openness
I dont think we need to be highlighting the argument that service providers take against developing NN frameworks- that of investments needed for laying infrastructure. They are powerful enough to do it themselves. That argument in my view doesn't hold, but I will not argue on that. It is enough that this is the service providers' argument and the public interest argument is more about people's right to access information, applications, services etc of their choice, and of media diversity etc. Why should we not be highlighting these public interest arguments rather than the regressive one - we need to fund investments in new infrastructure, so let us charge people as we want. Why would for instance we not instead say that we will examine the NN implications on content and media diversity and other rights of the people and communities.
Moreover there is something inherently repugnant about speaking about governance systems of the North alongwith needs/ infrastructure of the South...I am sorry to appear a bit too strong on this, but this is patronizing. South is as concerned about governance systems as it is about infrastructure, pl get this clearly. Milton, you are always concerned about how we should discuss governance issues more than infrastructural issues at the IGF, so why did it not occur to you to frame it something like this - how the emerging NN consensus in the North affects the South, when South is hardly included/participating in the global NN debates, while the NN regimes that will emerge from a North-based consensus will almost definitely become a global default, and thus be forced on the South.
I would also *not* like to start with - NN is confusing, which again is more the argument/ strategy of those opposed to NN who will like to use the alleged 'confusion' not to have anything done on NN. I would rather like to start with something like - There is an increasing recognition of the urgency to develop some kind of NN principles in order to preserve the open and democratic nature of the Internet, and safeguard the interest of Internet users and others effected by it.
The fact that there is an increasing recognition of such an urgency - seen from many political and legislative articulations of it in many countries - is at least as much of a fact as the supposed 'confusion' around NN. Whether we begin our workshop proposal statement one way or the other depends on our political proclivities. And it is my understanding that most IGC members prefer some kind of recognition of NN principles, rather than wanting to further add to the - deliberately whipped up - impression of 'great confusion around NN'. This is, in nay case, after all not an academic workshop. Though of course we will give platform to all views but 'confusion around NN' doesnt appear to be the right point of departure. If there is indeed so much confusion how did most relevant actors in Norway agree to a set of NN principles. Why should then we as a progressive civil society group want to keep harping on the 'confusion around NN'.
I propose the following text.
</FONT></BIG><BIG><FONT size=+0><BIG><FONT face="Times New Roman, Times, serif">
<SMALL>"There is an increasing recognition of the urgency to develop some kind of NN principles in order to preserve the open and democratic nature of the Internet, and safeguard the interest of Internet users and others affected by it</SMALL>. </FONT></BIG></FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman, Times, serif">This workshop will explore recent efforts to articulate and agree on NN principles in Europe, Japan, the U.S. and developing countries. While proceeding from numerous national regulatory developments, it will try to assess the transnational implications of various approaches to NN, especially vis a vis developing countries who seem largely absent from NN debates." </FONT></BIG><BIG><FONT face="Times New Roman, Times, serif">
The rest can be as it is.
Thanks
parminder
</FONT></BIG></PRE><BR>Milton L Mueller wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE
cite=mid:75822E125BCB994F8446858C4B19F0D7705BAD80@SUEX07-MBX-04.ad.syr.edu
type="cite"><PRE wrap="">With thanks to Parminder and Adam. For discussion and additions of examples (other countries)
Title
Network Neutrality - Exploring a global consensus on principles
Concise description (up to 200 words)
Network neutrality (NN) can be controversial because there are conflicting ideas about what it is and what obligations it imposes on service providers. This workshop will explore recent efforts to articulate and agree on NN principles in Europe, Japan, the U.S. and developing countries. While focused on national regulatory developments, it will try to assess the transnational implications of various approaches to NN and in particular examine how consensus in the developed world might affect infrastructure development in middle income and developing countries. Relates to theme -Openness
Who would you approach as co-organizers ? or who do you think should organize it?
Internet Governance Project (IGP) is happy to play a support role in organizing this. Others we would approach: Free Press (USA-based civil society advocacy group); Consumer Council of Norway; ITforChange (India-based civil society advocacy group), Japan Internet Providers Association and Ministry of Communications. There are other specific countries or examples that are involved in such negotiations over principles that we don't know about yet but will learn about later. We will seek out additional developing country commentators in particular.
Milton Mueller
Professor, Syracuse University School of Information Studies
XS4All Professor, Delft University of Technology
------------------------------
Internet Governance Project:
<A class=moz-txt-link-freetext href="http://internetgovernance.org">http://internetgovernance.org</A>
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
<A class=moz-txt-link-abbreviated href="mailto:governance@lists.cpsr.org">governance@lists.cpsr.org</A>
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
<A class=moz-txt-link-abbreviated href="mailto:governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org">governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org</A>
For all list information and functions, see:
<A class=moz-txt-link-freetext href="http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance">http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance</A>
</PRE></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE
cite=mid:75822E125BCB994F8446858C4B19F0D7705BAD80@SUEX07-MBX-04.ad.syr.edu
type="cite"></BLOCKQUOTE>
<P><FONT face=Arial size=2>Internal Virus Database is out of date.<BR>Checked
by AVG - http://www.avg.com<BR>Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database:
270.11.31/2028 - Release Date: 3/28/2009 7:16 AM<BR></FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT></P></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>