<div><span style="border-collapse:collapse;font-size:12px"><div>Hello,</div><div><br></div><div>The position of CEO of ICANN is halfway between a Corporate and an Electoral appointment. If it were a position such as the office of a Senator or a Minister, the process would attract candidates who throw themselves up for public scrutiny for months beginning with the 'Primary' part of the process. If it were such an absolute Public Office, there would probably be a willingness to 'contest' or 'compete' for the office.</div>
<div><br></div><div>This position has public responsibilities but has more features of a Corporate CEO appointment, so those qualified to offer to be candidates are likely to insist on confidentially perhaps bordering on Secrecy. If a serving CEO of a company SUCH AS Nokia Siemens or General Motors were to offer to be a candidate for the ICANN position, is it likely that we would expect them to have their names publicly thrown scrutiny in a pool of ten or more possible candidates? In all probability such candidates might prefer to keep their candidature unannounced until formally confirmed. Some might even feel uncomfortable exposing their interest to a committe of five which is too many...</div>
<div><br></div><div>It depends on what traits the Community looks for. A hundred 'political' candidates might queue up for public scrutiny if ICANN is looking for a political person. On the other hand it might take a million dollars in Headhunting effort to find even one or two candidates with the right attitude, background and a sense of purpose and this class of candidates wouldn't like the Primary public screening, secondary hearing, campaign, influence, caucus, final hearing, appointment, ratification, review cycle...</div>
<div><br></div><div>The community is right in its demand for transparency, but an insistence on transparency at the initial phase of the process might be counterproductive in the sense that it could discourage really qualified candidates who might prefer to be quiet about their pursuits until the time comes to make a public announcement. </div>
<div><br></div><div>A 'meet the candidates' at Sydney or elsewhere could be a good idea if it works, if it is feasible, if it is acceptable by the candidates, but if it can't happen, some alternate form of transparency could be thought of by the community. Perhaps the community could ask for periodic updates from the Committee about what it can share of the progress of the process ? </div>
<div><br></div><br clear="all">Sivasubramanian Muthusamy<br><a href="http://isocmadras.blogspot.com" target="_blank">http://isocmadras.blogspot.com</a></span><br></div>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2009/4/17 "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:wolfgang.kleinwaechter@medienkomm.uni-halle.de" target="_blank">wolfgang.kleinwaechter@medienkomm.uni-halle.de</a>></span><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Dear list<br>
<br>
as we all know there is a process under way to select/elect a new CEO & President for ICANN.<br>
<br>
My knowledge for the moment is that a special head hunting company was hired and a special board committee with five members (ICANN directors, chaird by the ICANN chair) is dealing with the issue. However there is only little transparency in the procress of nomination and selection so far.<br>
<br>
During the Mexico At Large Summit we called for more transparncy in ICANN procedures. I do not know what other members of the list are thinking but my understanding is that at least some transparency in the process would be important to build trust and institutional confidence into the future of ICANN. I understand very well - as a former Associated Chair of the NomCom - that some elements of the process has to be handled in a confidential way. However the CEO& President is different from an ordinary ICANN Director and it would be helpful for the whole community and the various constituencies that they are - in one way or another - informed and partly also involved in the process.<br>
<br>
My understanding of the timetable is that until the Sydney meeting there will be a shortlist and after the Sydney meeting the Board will make its decision.The CEO is elected by the Board.<br>
<br>
One idea to improve and enhance trust and transparency could be that during the forthconing Sydney meeting the shortlisted candidates are invited to present their views and visions on ICANNs operation and its future. They should be available also for a Q&A sessions to the broader ICANN community. The At Large Community would be the legtimite body to ask for such a publich hearing. It would be very consistent with what we called for in the ATLAS Mexico Declaration.<br>
<br>
Wolfgang<br>
____________________________________________________________<br>
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:<br>
<a href="mailto:governance@lists.cpsr.org" target="_blank">governance@lists.cpsr.org</a><br>
To be removed from the list, send any message to:<br>
<a href="mailto:governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org" target="_blank">governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org</a><br>
<br>
For all list information and functions, see:<br>
<a href="http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance" target="_blank">http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br>