<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.3492" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=519470321-24032009><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>Yes, yes, yes. I like that formulation. Would love to be on
such a panel. This must be "agree with Parminder Day." </FONT></SPAN></DIV><!-- Converted from text/plain format -->
<P><FONT size=2>Milton Mueller<BR>Professor, Syracuse University School of
Information Studies<BR>XS4All Professor, Delft University of
Technology<BR>------------------------------<BR>Internet Governance
Project:<BR><A
href="http://internetgovernance.org/">http://internetgovernance.org</A><BR></FONT></P>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">In
fact so interesting, that I think we should have a workshop on this issue
alone. 'NN - What is the GLOBAL angle on it'. In any case it is always better
to have more focussed issues for workshops.<BR><BR>I do often wonder that if
US, or US plus EU, decide that such-and-such NN regulation is necessary to be
observed by the concerned actors, would that not set the default global regime
for NN. Do developing countries - even a relatively larger and more powerful
one like India - have any serious options but to accept the default
regime. <BR><BR>What NN issues extend across the global Internet, or are
likely to so extend? What accordingly are NN issues that are best dealt by a
globally democratic system - and if there isnt one at present, the problems
that such a situation presents. <BR><BR>Discussing NN in terms of global
Internet policy will be in accordance of the central mandate of the IGF as a
policy dialogue forum for global Internet policy issues. parminder <BR><BR><!--[if !mso]><![endif]--></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>