<HTML dir=ltr><HEAD><TITLE>Re: [governance] My blog on the Tuesday consultation</TITLE>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=unicode">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.3395" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV id=idOWAReplyText84348 dir=ltr>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>Raul,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2>no one asserted that these lists were "closed and secret." my blog posts links to the open archives of ARIN ppml. </FONT></DIV></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><BR>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>Van:</B> Raul Echeberria [mailto:raul@lacnic.net]<BR><B>Verzonden:</B> do 18-9-2008 12:31<BR><B>Aan:</B> governance@lists.cpsr.org; Jeanette Hofmann<BR><B>CC:</B> Milton L Mueller<BR><B>Onderwerp:</B> Re: [governance] My blog on the Tuesday consultation<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV>
<P><FONT size=2>Jeanette:<BR><BR>i completely disagree with your assertion and I have to confess that I <BR>am very surprised to see you saying that.<BR>The Technical community doesn't exist in the sense that you try to <BR>describe. There are not a lot of closed and secret lists of people <BR>that fight very much among them and later smiles to the other <BR>stakeholders.<BR><BR>The lists that you refer are usually open and everybody can <BR>participate and become engaged in the discussions.<BR>The probe of that is that Milton has became one of the top 3-5 in <BR>posting emails in ARIN policy list. You can become also engaged in <BR>those discussions if you want.<BR><BR>It is also very unfair what you said regarding the "educational" <BR>attitude. You have had a lot of opporuntities to partcipate in deep <BR>frank and open discussions with many "technical community" people.<BR><BR><BR><BR>Raùl<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>El 18/09/2008, a las 11:48 a.m., Jeanette Hofmann escribió:<BR><BR>> Hi Milton, you address something on the blog that I have also found <BR>> puzzling. The technical community engages in fierce debates on their <BR>> mailing lists and in face2face meetings. However, as soon as they <BR>> interact with others they take an educational stance and try to hide <BR>> the highly controversial dimension of the issues at stake. IPv4/IPv6 <BR>> is a good example. Why is that?<BR>> jeanette<BR>><BR>> Milton L Mueller wrote:<BR>>> For those of you who haven''t seen it, here is my take on the IGF <BR>>> consultation<BR>>> <A href="http://blog.internetgovernance.org/blog/_archives/2008/9/17/3889384.html">http://blog.internetgovernance.org/blog/_archives/2008/9/17/3889384.html</A><BR>> ____________________________________________________________<BR>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:<BR>> governance@lists.cpsr.org<BR>> To be removed from the list, send any message to:<BR>> governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org<BR>><BR>> For all list information and functions, see:<BR>> <A href="http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance">http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance</A><BR><BR></FONT></P></DIV></BODY></HTML>