<div dir="ltr">Dear Lisa,<br><br>"Projection" is about your intentions or about scoring...<br><br>Let me explain it, using an analogy, made by my friend Nat Sakimura, trustee at <a href="http://www.xdi.org">www.xdi.org</a>, an organization working on a protocol, XRI, that may help giving users the ability to enjoy more rights on the net.<br>
<br>I do not know if you like soccer/football, but since you live in planet Earth :-) , you probably know the basics of the game (with cricket, most people do not know...).<br><br>So, if you use your virtual personality (email, blog, phone, cellular, SMS, database record, bank account) to get something for your benefit, you score a goal, but if someone else use it for something against your benefit, you received a goal.<br>
<br>With this analogy you can see that people working on privacy protection, are defenders. Trying to avoid that others do not use your virtual personality against you.<br><br>Some people claim that the best Goal keeper may be the Constitutional Court (US Supreme Court), specially if you give the goal keeper a "good pair of gloves", or a specific virtual personality fundamental right, that they can use.... (I sent a link in my last email of an example of such a test, now being studied at the CR Congress)<br>
<br>And projection is mainly about scoring...<br><br>The best example of projection is projecting your intentions for your benefit. Example of intentions can be:<br><br>A. If you are in extreme poverty, a data base record, with the consent of the person, that shows what it needs. Also a bot (software robot) that informs and interacts with people and entities that can help this person (today is not operational but in a few years it will...).<br>
<br>B. Your CV and your requirements to change job (In the next few years people will be able to have this available for everyone. Probably this will be done by Google or alike, in the same way they are now having online the medical records. So this new right will make Google and others to be more gentle in the Terms of Service... ;-) ).<br>
<br>C. Same as B, but offering a service or product instead of your CV.<br><br>D. Same as B but about relations, including looking and searching for friends and mate/couple.<br><br>In the future, probably, most countries will offer to their citizens several kinds of projection services, because it will increase economically and socially the quality of life of the people.<br>
<br>This information, <b><u>your intentions</u></b>, it is very yours, but it is also very valuable, specially for companies like Amazon, Google and Facebook, and it needs protection. If not, you will have not choice but to accept the terms that Corporations will offer you, for receiving those projection related benefits... <br>
<br>Sorry again for the long email, and I hope that we can exchange a lot more in the future!. :-)<br><br>Very best regards,<br><br>Jaco<br><br> <br><br><br><br><br><br> <br><br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 2:45 AM, Lisa Horner <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:lisa@global-partners.co.uk">lisa@global-partners.co.uk</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div link="blue" vlink="purple" lang="EN-US">
<div>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">Thanks for all of this information Jaco – it is certainly
important progress that you're making. I'm especially interested
in the ideas of projection as they're quite new to me. Please could you
explain a bit more so that I can be sure that I fully understand? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">Many thanks,</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">Lisa</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"> </span></p>
<div style="border-style: solid none none; border-color: rgb(181, 196, 223) -moz-use-text-color -moz-use-text-color; border-width: 1pt medium medium; padding: 3pt 0cm 0cm;">
<p><b><span style="font-size: 10pt;">From:</span></b><span style="font-size: 10pt;"> Jaco Aizenman
[mailto:<a href="mailto:skorpio@gmail.com" target="_blank">skorpio@gmail.com</a>] <br>
<b>Sent:</b> 14 August 2008 18:25<div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br>
<b>To:</b> Lisa Horner<br>
<b>Cc:</b> <a href="mailto:governance@lists.cpsr.org" target="_blank">governance@lists.cpsr.org</a>; <a href="mailto:bill-of-rights@ipjustice.org" target="_blank">bill-of-rights@ipjustice.org</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [Bill-of-Rights] Rights in IG research</div></div></span></p>
</div><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">
<p> </p>
<div>
<p style="margin-bottom: 12pt;">Dear Lisa,<br>
<br>
Other options for "virtual personality" may be "virtual
identity" or "digital identity". In Costa Rica at an early stage
we first used "identity", but later, we changed to
"personality". I understand that also the German Constitutional Court
used "personality" or a variant of this term. <br>
<br>
Please also note that this new fundamental right(link below - A) protects not
just privacy (content), but much more, including, existence, presence and
projection:<br>
<br>
1. Existence: It means that it is a right, and not a privilege granted by
Corporations or Governments, to exist on the internet, or any future global
virtual network. This virtual existence goes beyond email, blog, skype account
or social sites, but also bank accounts, or exist on a database (always
with the person/human agreement) that implies benefit for the person, for
example a database of benefits that people in extreme poverty receives. <br>
<br>
This means that it is a human right to have a bank account!. For you and me it
is not important, because we both have bank accounts, however for people in
extreme poverty(B), it means a lot, because it is a tool to get funds that
otherwise get lost.<br>
<br>
This component is strongly related with access.<br>
<br>
2. Presence: Protects your virtual presence in all virtual networks. This mean
that it will be unconstitutional any kind (email, SMS, fax, phone calls, blog,
etc) of spam and of tracking (RFID, cellular) without the person prior consent.<br>
<br>
3. Projection: Protects not just your content being used by others, but also
your intentions or wills. The intentions will be strategic in the future,
specially because of all the developments in bot´s and systems that help people
get what they want.<br>
<br>
Like everything else, probably there is a lot of edition to make in the
constitutional text to make it better, and any contribution from any person
will be greatly appreciated. <br>
<br>
At least this represent a first case that will motivate other Congresses around
the world to consider this new fundamental right, and definitely IBR can be the
host of this process (the common shared place where all Congresses exchange
information and communicate). <br>
<br>
Please note that Germany has the new "internet" fundamental right
(which deals mainly about privacy, and not about presence, existence and
projection) because of a case presented in the Constitutional Court, and not
because of a Congress process, which takes a lot of time. This means that other
countries, including USA, can take that "shortcut" to have this new
fundamental right, in a much shorter time. <br>
<br>
Sorry for the long email, and I will be more than happy to comment more details
about anything on this email.<br>
<br>
Very best regards,<br>
<br>
Jaco<br>
<br>
Some relevant links:<br>
<br>
Spanish<br>
<a href="http://personalidadvirtual.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://personalidadvirtual.blogspot.com/</a><br>
<a href="http://www.asamblea.go.cr/actual/boletin/2006/oct06/24oct06.htm" target="_blank">http://www.asamblea.go.cr/actual/boletin/2006/oct06/24oct06.htm</a><br>
<a href="http://www.prensalibre.co.cr/2007/marzo/17/abanico08.php" target="_blank">http://www.prensalibre.co.cr/2007/marzo/17/abanico08.php</a><br>
<br>
English (sorry, the material in English is bad translated...)<br>
The fundamental right text being studied by the CR Human Rights Congress
commission:<br>
(A) <a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20070704102907/http:/virtualrights.org/files/Congress%20of%20the%20Republic%20of%20Costa%20Rica.doc" target="_blank">http://web.archive.org/web/20070704102907/http://virtualrights.org/files/Congress%20of%20the%20Republic%20of%20Costa%20Rica.doc</a><br>
(B)<br>
More about the relation with extreme poverty eradication:<br>
<a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20070704102907/http:/virtualrights.org/files/project_overview_latest.pdf" target="_blank">http://web.archive.org/web/20070704102907/http://virtualrights.org/files/project_overview_latest.pdf</a><br>
<br>
</p>
<div>
<p>On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 4:01 AM, Lisa Horner <<a href="mailto:lisa@global-partners.co.uk" target="_blank">lisa@global-partners.co.uk</a>>
wrote:</p>
<div>
<div>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">Hi Jaco</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">Thanks for your support for the
FoE Project, and congratulations on the progress that you've made in Costa Rica
around the 'virtual personality' right. I think in English it's more
commonly referred to as the right to privacy online/ the right to protect
'digital identity'? Yes, I do think that the recent developments in
German law are very positive and important. This process of adapting
national legislation and constitutional protections to the internet age is
incredibly important to watch and for rights activists to be involved in.
Germany's constitutional court has addressed directly the complications of
balancing privacy rights with notions of the 'public interest' (eg security)
– I think it would be great to have someone who was involved in the
process on the IGF panel concerning cyber-security and trust.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">Regarding how this relates to
the FoE project – in our framework we would see introducing protections
for digital identity and privacy in national law as a way for governments to
uphold the principle concerning privacy. Privacy is obviously a key
principle, with an intimate relationship to freedom of expression.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">Best wishes,</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">Lisa</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"> </span></p>
<div style="border-style: solid none none; border-color: -moz-use-text-color; border-width: 1pt medium medium; padding: 3pt 0cm 0cm;">
<p><b><span style="font-size: 10pt;">From:</span></b><span style="font-size: 10pt;"> Jaco Aizenman [mailto:<a href="mailto:skorpio@gmail.com" target="_blank">skorpio@gmail.com</a>] <br>
<b>Sent:</b> 12 August 2008 02:32<br>
<b>To:</b> Lisa Horner<br>
<b>Cc:</b> <a href="mailto:governance@lists.cpsr.org" target="_blank">governance@lists.cpsr.org</a>;
<a href="mailto:bill-of-rights@ipjustice.org" target="_blank">bill-of-rights@ipjustice.org</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [Bill-of-Rights] Rights in IG research</span></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p> </p>
<div>
<p style="margin-bottom: 12pt;">Dear Lisa,<br>
<br>
Thank you for the FoE link, which is very impressive and I support. Let
me know if I can help in any way the FoE from Costa Rica.<br>
<br>
Please also note that a new virtual personality fundamental right is
complementary to FoE, and can enhance even more the FoE initiative. Of course
it has to be done in the right way....<br>
<br>
If Constitutional Courts worldwide will have a clear and good virtual
personality fundamental right (Internet rights) it will be much easier to
implement fully the FoE initiative and vice versa.<br>
<br>
Don´ t you like or support the first, worldwide, "internet right",
made a few months ago by the German Constitutional Court?.<br>
<br>
Thanks a lot for your time.<br>
<br>
Best regards,<br>
<br>
Jaco<br>
<br>
</p>
<div>
<p>On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 5:31 AM, Lisa Horner <<a href="mailto:lisa@global-partners.co.uk" target="_blank">lisa@global-partners.co.uk</a>>
wrote:</p>
<div>
<div>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">Hi Max and all</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">Thanks for your interest in
what we're doing. I'm equally interested in your work and in exploring
potentials for collaboration. Maybe we could start a 'research ideas' and
'research in progress' page on the bill of rights wiki?</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">Apologies in advance for the
length of this email – those who aren't interested can delete email or go
into skim-read mode now!</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">The research we're doing is as
part of the ongoing Freedom of Expression Project. I think I've mentioned
before that we're working with 6 key partner organizations in different
countries to develop policy principles that, if adhered to, would shape a
global communications environment that would support human rights and a 'public
interest' communications environment. They address issues spanning
infrastructure, code and content. The latest draft of the principles is
available and open for comment at <a href="http://www.freedomofexpression.org.uk/resources/public+interest+principles+for+the+networked+communications+environment" target="_blank">http://www.freedomofexpression.org.uk/resources/public+interest+principles+for+the+networked+communications+environment</a>.
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">The principles and values that
they express are purposefully broad so that they can be tailored to specific
contexts. The idea is for them to provide an overarching framework for
policy discussion and advocacy at different scales. For example, our
project partners are currently working to elaborate what they might mean in
different country contexts, and this in turn will provide the foundations for
policy work. A major aim is to identify spaces where different
stakeholders can agree that they share certain values and principles, and work
to shape policy accordingly.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">We have been working to base
all of our work so far in international human rights standards, in particular
freedom of expression, the right to culture and the right to participation in
government. We've taken an expansive definition of freedom of expression
that many (but not all) human rights institutions and lawyers around the world
take. This includes positive dimensions of freedom of expression,
including the notion that governments are responsible for putting the necessary
structures/infrastructures in place for the right to be realized.
Incidentally, that's why I don't believe that we need to be advocating for new
rights such as the right to the internet or to communication. The
sentiments and demands expressed by these 'new' rights are already contained
within the human rights system. In my opinion, our energy should be
focused on further developing and upholding what we have already, for example,
further embedding expansive definitions of freedom of expression in rights and
policy institutions. And, as Anriette and Milton importantly pointed out,
in furthering/developing understanding about what international rights
standards and compliance with them actually means in practice.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">The research that I referred to
before is intended to contribute to this effort, illustrating how an expansive
definition of freedom of expression is being supported in contemporary legal
and philosophical thought and case law, and identifying areas where further
work needs to be done. It is taking our policy principles framework as a
starting point, ensuring that it is firmly rooted in the international human
rights system. In this way, if the framework was used as a basis for
policy discussion, human rights standards would effectively be 'mainstreamed'
within the discussions.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">Whilst I'm sure some would make
the argument that these aren't IG issues, we hope that we're making a positive
contribution towards ensuring that the 'shared norms and principles that shape
the use and evolution of the internet' are rooted in human rights
standards. These are the most widely accepted and acknowledged ethical
standards in the world, which (in reference to earlier conversations) is why it
makes sense to us to work with them and build on them, rather than try to
reinvent or disregard them. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">I'll leave it there for now, but
I'm interested to hear anybody's thoughts on the work we're doing, and am
keen to explore opportunities to collaborate on further research on any of
these issues.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">Many thanks,</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">Lisa</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"> </span></p>
<div style="border-style: solid none none; border-color: -moz-use-text-color; border-width: 1pt medium medium; padding: 3pt 0cm 0cm;">
<p><b><span style="font-size: 10pt;">From:</span></b><span style="font-size: 10pt;"> <a href="mailto:bill-of-rights-bounces@ipjustice.org" target="_blank">bill-of-rights-bounces@ipjustice.org</a>
[mailto:<a href="mailto:bill-of-rights-bounces@ipjustice.org" target="_blank">bill-of-rights-bounces@ipjustice.org</a>]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Max Senges<br>
<b>Sent:</b> 06 August 2008 17:36<br>
<b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:governance@lists.cpsr.org" target="_blank">governance@lists.cpsr.org</a>;
Anriette Esterhuysen; <a href="mailto:bill-of-rights@ipjustice.org" target="_blank">bill-of-rights@ipjustice.org</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> [Bill-of-Rights] Rights in IG research</span></p>
</div>
<p> </p>
<div>
<p style="margin-bottom: 12pt;">dear lisa and all<br>
<br>
Lisa wrote:<br>
> We've just commissioned some research into how policy principles based<br>
> around notions such as net neutrality, interoperability, universal<br>
> access and content diversity can be rooted in the international human<br>
> rights system which will hopefully yield some interesting insights...<br>
<br>
that sounds very interesting. Stanford lawschool's Center for Internet and
Society has offered to collaborate by contributing research and i agreed to
frame research opportunities/themes for student projects to be taken up in the fall.
<br>
<br>
It would be great to team up or at least be aware of all the other research
undertaken to better understand a Rights based approach to IG.<br>
<br>
Lisa could you share a bit more info about Global Partners research? <br>
<br>
Everybody else doing research work in this area is very much invited to get in
touch so we can ensure we complement, share and avoid duplication <br>
<br>
best<br>
max</p>
<div>
<p>On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 5:37 AM, Anriette Esterhuysen <<a href="mailto:anriette@apc.org" target="_blank">anriette@apc.org</a>> wrote:</p>
<p>Hallo all<br>
<br>
Lisa, you are correct in that the SA Human Rights Commission is the appropriate<br>
institution to deal with this. In fact they deal with hate speech issues quite
often.<br>
<br>
They are under-resourced, but they do do excellent work. Here is their
URL<br>
<a href="http://www.sahrc.org.za/sahrc_cms/publish/cat_index_26.shtml" target="_blank">http://www.sahrc.org.za/sahrc_cms/publish/cat_index_26.shtml</a><br>
<br>
Draft hate speech legislation has been before parlaiment a few times here in
South<br>
Africa. I am not sure what the status is. If I remember correctly the
draft bill was badly<br>
not well conceived and very controversial.<br>
<br>
I certainly think that making a formal complaint to the HRC (human rights<br>
commission) would the way to start if the intension is to create public
awareness of<br>
the issue.<br>
<br>
It will also drive lots of traffic to the site.... which is less desirable.
Personally, Rui, I<br>
would just ignore it.<br>
<br>
Lisa, I completely agree with you about the relationship between rights and
internet<br>
governance. Sadly I think that we have lost ground since WSIS. As you say
there is a<br>
lot of work to be done to get beyond rights rhetoric and to work out what the<br>
implementable rights-based public policy principles are that we can work with
on<br>
specific issues, e.g. those you mention, for example net-neutrality. APC
tries to adopt<br>
this approach in our access work.<br>
<br>
I also think that the mainstream human rights movement has not engaged this
terrain<br>
enough, altough there are exceptions.<br>
<br>
Anriette<br>
<br>
<br>
Date sent: Wed, 6 Aug 2008
12:09:58 +0100<br>
From: "Lisa
Horner" <<a href="mailto:lisa@global-partners.co.uk" target="_blank">lisa@global-partners.co.uk</a>><br>
To: <<a href="mailto:governance@lists.cpsr.org" target="_blank">governance@lists.cpsr.org</a>>,<br>
"Rui Correia" <<a href="mailto:correia.rui@gmail.com" target="_blank">correia.rui@gmail.com</a>><br>
Subject: RE:
[governance] Taking down a site [was: beijing ticket scam]<br>
Send reply to: <a href="mailto:governance@lists.cpsr.org" target="_blank">governance@lists.cpsr.org</a>,"Lisa
Horner" <lisa@global-<br>
<a href="http://partners.co.uk" target="_blank">partners.co.uk</a>><br>
<br>
> Echoing Ian, I wonder if it would be worth filing a complaint with the<br>
> South African Human Rights Commission? The SA bill of rights states<br>
> that freedom of expression doesn't extend to "advocacy of hatred that<br>
> is based on race, ethnicity, gender or religion, and that constitutes<br>
> incitement to cause harm." Is this supported by any other legislation<br>
> in SA?<br>
><br>
> So many of our discussions around internet governance issues can be<br>
> approached from a rights perspective, but human rights lawyers and<br>
> institutions are usually absent from the debate. Human rights and<br>
> their associated tools and mechanisms are arguably one of the only<br>
> global governance institutions that is 'thickening' in the current age<br>
> of 'globalisation'. Human rights approaches also have an inbuilt<br>
> framework for balancing out tensions between different rights and<br>
> responsibilities. However, there's still a lot of work to be done in<br>
> bringing them up to date and ensuring that they're capable of dealing<br>
> with new issues, including those relating to freedom of expression and<br>
> the internet. I wonder if engaging directly with national human<br>
> rights institutions is one way of starting that process?<br>
><br>
> In a way, this is linked to Anriette's comment that many new campaigns<br>
> around rights are a-historical. Similarly, I think that they should<br>
> be rooted in, or at least have a firm understanding of, existing human<br>
> rights institutions, both formal and informal and at all scales.<br>
> We've just commissioned some research into how policy principles based<br>
> around notions such as net neutrality, interoperability, universal<br>
> access and content diversity can be rooted in the international human<br>
> rights system which will hopefully yield some interesting insights...<br>
><br>
> Any thoughts?<br>
><br>
> Thanks,<br>
> Lisa<br>
<br>
------------------------------------------------------<br>
Anriette Esterhuysen, Executive Director<br>
Association for Progressive Communications<br>
<a href="mailto:anriette@apc.org" target="_blank">anriette@apc.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.apc.org" target="_blank">http://www.apc.org</a><br>
PO Box 29755, Melville, South Africa. 2109<br>
Tel. 27 11 726 1692<br>
Fax 27 11 726 1692<br>
<br>
____________________________________________________________<br>
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:<br>
<a href="mailto:governance@lists.cpsr.org" target="_blank">governance@lists.cpsr.org</a><br>
To be removed from the list, send any message to:<br>
<a href="mailto:governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org" target="_blank">governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org</a><br>
<br>
For all list information and functions, see:<br>
<a href="http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance" target="_blank">http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance</a></p>
</div>
<p><br>
<br clear="all">
<br>
-- <br>
-------------------------------------------------<br>
"It is not the critic who counts, not the man who points out how the
strong man stumbled, or where the doer of deeds could have done better. The
credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena; whose face is marred by
the dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs and comes short
again and again; who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions and
spends himself in a worthy cause; ... so that his place shall never be with
those cold and timid souls who know neither victory or defeat."<br>
- THEODORE ROOSEVELT <br>
(Paris Sorbonne,1910) <br>
<br>
-------------------------------------------------<br>
Dr. Max Senges<br>
Stanford Post-Doc Visiting Scholar<br>
UOC Research Associate <br>
Freelance Consultant<br>
<br>
98 Loyola Ave., Menlo Park, California 94025<br>
<br>
US-Phone: (001) 650 714 9826<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.maxsenges.com" target="_blank">www.maxsenges.com</a><br>
<a href="http://www.knowledgeentrepreneur.com" target="_blank">www.knowledgeentrepreneur.com</a><br>
------------------------------------------------------------</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p style="margin-bottom: 12pt;"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Bill-of-Rights mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Bill-of-Rights@ipjustice.org" target="_blank">Bill-of-Rights@ipjustice.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/bill-of-rights" target="_blank">http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/bill-of-rights</a></p>
</div>
<p><br>
<br clear="all">
<br>
-- <br>
Jaco Aizenman L.<br>
My iname is =jaco (<a href="http://xri.net/=jaco" target="_blank">http://xri.net/=jaco</a>)<br>
XDI Board member - <a href="http://www.xdi.org" target="_blank">www.xdi.org</a><br>
Tel/Voicemail: 506-83461570 <br>
Costa Rica<br>
<br>
What is an i-name?<br>
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I-name" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I-name</a></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p><br>
<br clear="all">
<br>
-- <br>
Jaco Aizenman L.<br>
My iname is =jaco (<a href="http://xri.net/=jaco" target="_blank">http://xri.net/=jaco</a>)<br>
XDI Board member - <a href="http://www.xdi.org" target="_blank">www.xdi.org</a><br>
Tel/Voicemail: 506-83461570 <br>
Costa Rica<br>
<br>
What is an i-name?<br>
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I-name" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I-name</a></p>
</div>
</div></div></div>
</div>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Jaco Aizenman L.<br>My iname is =jaco (<a href="http://xri.net/=jaco">http://xri.net/=jaco</a>)<br>XDI Board member - <a href="http://www.xdi.org">www.xdi.org</a><br>Tel/Voicemail: 506-83461570 <br>
Costa Rica<br><br>What is an i-name?<br><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I-name">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I-name</a><br>
</div>