<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:x="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:excel" xmlns:p="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:powerpoint" xmlns:a="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:access" xmlns:dt="uuid:C2F41010-65B3-11d1-A29F-00AA00C14882" xmlns:s="uuid:BDC6E3F0-6DA3-11d1-A2A3-00AA00C14882" xmlns:rs="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:rowset" xmlns:z="#RowsetSchema" xmlns:b="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:publisher" xmlns:ss="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:spreadsheet" xmlns:c="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:component:spreadsheet" xmlns:oa="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:activation" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40" xmlns:q="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:D="DAV:" xmlns:x2="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/excel/2003/xml" xmlns:ois="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/ois/" xmlns:dir="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/directory/" xmlns:ds="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#" xmlns:dsp="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/dsp" xmlns:udc="http://schemas.microsoft.com/data/udc" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:sub="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/2002/1/alerts/" xmlns:ec="http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmlenc#" xmlns:sp="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/" xmlns:sps="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:udcxf="http://schemas.microsoft.com/data/udc/xmlfile" xmlns:wf="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/workflow/" xmlns:mver="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/markup-compatibility/2006" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns:mrels="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/package/2006/relationships" xmlns:ex12t="http://schemas.microsoft.com/exchange/services/2006/types" xmlns:ex12m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/exchange/services/2006/messages" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)">
<title>Message</title>
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page Section1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple>
<div class=Section1>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>Hi<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>Just to clarify, the Internet Bill of Rights (IBR) Dynamic
Coalition’s proposal is focused specifically on exploring how ‘existing’
rights are relevant to the work of each of the dynamic coalitions and whether
we can build some kind of commitment or agreement amongst the coalitions to ‘mainstream’
rights within their work. We didn’t have much time to write and share
the proposal within the IBR group, so apologies for not sharing it with
interested parties on this list earlier.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>The plan is for the workshop to be an outcome or culmination of
conversations between the IBR group and other dynamic coalitions between now and
December. If members of other dynamic coalitions are on this list, it would be
great to hear your thoughts about our proposals.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>This workshop would complement the IG Civil Society workshop on a
rights approach/agenda to IG. As I understand it, the ‘Rights agenda’
workshop plans to map out rights issues as they relate to the internet, taking
a fairly broad approach. The ‘Dynamic Coalition’ workshop is
focused specifically on the work of the coalitions and practical measures that
could be taken to help them to protect and advance human rights.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>I’d also like to express my support for all of the other
workshops being proposed by this group.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>Best wishes,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>Lisa<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm'>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> Michael Gurstein
[mailto:gurstein@gmail.com] <br>
<b>Sent:</b> 30 April 2008 06:36<br>
<b>To:</b> governance@lists.cpsr.org; 'Max Senges'<br>
<b>Subject:</b> RE: [governance] IGF workshops<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<blockquote style='margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:5.0pt'>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:blue'>Max,</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:blue'>Maybe I'm missing it, but in what you've pointed to I don't see
where the issues which we have been discussing here around the rubric
"Right to the Internet" are included.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:blue'>MG</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> -----Original
Message-----<br>
<b>From:</b> Max Senges [mailto:maxsenges@gmail.com] <br>
<b>Sent:</b> April 29, 2008 10:34 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> governance@lists.cpsr.org; Jeanette Hofmann<br>
<b>Cc:</b> Parminder<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [governance] IGF workshops<br>
<br>
</span><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:blue'> </span><span style='font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'>I also support all 4 proposals.<br>
<br>
Regarding the Rights Agenda workshop, I'd like to share that the IBR DC is
preparing an additional workshop proposal which deals with the practicalities
of including Rights in Internet Governance. (<a
href="http://www.socialtext.net/internet-bill-of-rights/index.cgi?mainstreaming_human_rights_in_the_work_of_the_dynamic_coalitions">http://www.socialtext.net/internet-bill-of-rights/index.cgi?mainstreaming_human_rights_in_the_work_of_the_dynamic_coalitions</a>)<br>
<br>
IMHO the proposed workshop on the Agenda is meant to bring all the folks
interested in Rights together, map the field (synergies and hot topics)
and start working on a shared agenda.<br>
<br>
Max<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal>On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 8:51 AM, Jeanette Hofmann
<jeanette@wzb.eu> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>A yes to all 4 workshop proposals from me as well.<br>
I hope though that the one on rights will be revised after the submission.<br>
jeanette<br>
<br>
shaila mistry wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal>"Yes" to all four workshops<br>
Shaila Rao Mistry<br>
<br>
*/Parminder <<a href="mailto:parminder@itforchange.net" target="_blank">parminder@itforchange.net</a>>/*
wrote:<br>
<br>
<br>
Hi all<br>
<br>
Please find enclosed the full text of four workshop proposals,
that IGC<br>
proposes to sponsor at the IGF, Hyderabad.<br>
<br>
1. The Transboundary Internet: Jurisdiction, Control and
Sovereignty<br>
<br>
2. The Future of ICANN: After the JPA, What?<br>
<br>
3. A Rights Agenda for Internet Governance<br>
<br>
4. The role and mandate of the IGF<br>
<br>
<br>
These are being put for a 48 hour consensus process. If a
consensus or a<br>
rough consensus is made out, these proposals will be submitted to<br>
the IGF<br>
secretariat on the 30th, around 5 PM GMT.<br>
<br>
Please indicate a clear 'yes' or 'no' for forwarding these
proposals, as<br>
they stand...<br>
<br>
While additional comments justifying a yes or no vote may be made,
they<br>
should follow a clear unqualified 'yes' or 'no'.<br>
<br>
In fact such additional comments are welcome especially in case of
a<br>
'no'<br>
vote, because it helps calling a possible rough consensus, taking
into<br>
consideration the nature and the extent of dissent.<br>
<br>
Thanks<br>
<br>
Parminder<br>
____________________________________________________________<br>
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:<br>
<a href="mailto:governance@lists.cpsr.org" target="_blank">governance@lists.cpsr.org</a><br>
To be removed from the list, send any message to:<br>
<a href="mailto:governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org"
target="_blank">governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org</a><br>
<br>
For all list information and functions, see:<br>
<a href="http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance"
target="_blank">http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance</a><br>
From: "Bret Fausett" <<a
href="mailto:bfausett@internet.law.pro" target="_blank">bfausett@internet.law.pro</a>><br>
To: <<a href="mailto:governance@lists.cpsr.org" target="_blank">governance@lists.cpsr.org</a>><br>
Subject: [governance] Workshop Proposal: Transboundary Internet<br>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 11:57:53 +0530<br>
<br>
All, below is a draft workshop proposal that Meryem Marzouki,
William Drake, Ian Peter, Parminder Singh and I have been working
on. We plan to submit it by the deadline, but would like your
input and suggestions, on all aspects.<br>
-- Bret<br>
- - - - - D R A F T - - - - -<br>
1. Name of proposed workshop<br>
The Transboundary Internet: Jurisdiction, Control and Sovereignty<br>
2. Provide a concise description of the
proposed workshop theme including its importance and relevance to
the IGF.<br>
The Internet crosses the boundaries of all nations and raises some
unique transboundary jurisdictional problems. The recent case of a
British citizen living in Spain, with Internet servers in the
Bahamas, selling holidays to Cuba, and having his domain name
impounded by a registrar located in the USA because it appeared to
break the US embargo against Cuba is one recent case in point.
Another landmark case was the French-US Yahoo! case in 1999
dealing with sale of nazi memorabilia, but but apart from these
high profile content cases there are many examples in other areas
such as privacy, consumer issues, cybercrime, and intellectual
property.<br>
This workshop will discuss the many implications of competing
national jurisdictions being projected into a globalized space
where multiple normative sources apply, such as political, legal,
technical, contractual, and behavioral regulations. Through
practical case studies, this workshop will look at the
implications of various approaches to resolving these issues and
the implications for Internet governance, international law, national
sovereignty, democracy, and human rights and fundamental freedoms.<br>
The workshop also explores the implications for Internet
governance where no structures are in place to deal with emerging
issues, and how default unilateral action in the absence of
structural alternatives can lead to de facto Internet governance.<br>
3. Provide the names and affiliations of the
panellists you are planning to invite. Describe the main actors in
the field and whether you have approached them about their
willingness to participate in proposed workshop.<br>
NB. Workshop duration is 90mn, which means that we should have no
more than 6-7 panelists plus chair. This is a tentative list of
speakers.<br>
• Maud de Boer-Buquicchio, Deputy
Secretary General, The<br>
Council of Europe<br>
• Manon Ress /James Love, Knowledge
Ecology<br>
International/CPTech, USA<br>
• Meryem Marzouki, President, European
Digital Rights, Europe<br>
• Bret A. Fausett, Internet law
Attorney, Cathcart, Collins & Kneafsey, LLP USA<br>
• Ian Peter, Internet Analyst, Ian
Peter and Associates,<br>
Australia<br>
• William Drake, Graduate Institute of
International and<br>
Development Studies, Switzerland<br>
Yet to be approached: other identified experts with various
perspectives on specific case studies.<br>
Themes to be discussed by speakers:<br>
• Liability and the principle of the
country of origin<br>
(off-line and on-line content): Convention on
Transfrontier television, Rome II, Convention on TV without
Frontiers,<br>
• Consumer protection, contracts, etc.:
Hague Convention,<br>
E-commerce directive<br>
• Cybercrime: The CoE Convention, its
protocols and<br>
implementation activities<br>
• Technical and contractual means: ISP
charters and hotlines,<br>
blocking (cf. Pakistan case)<br>
• Harmonization of national laws
through intergovernmental<br>
agreements<br>
4. Provide the name of the organizer(s) of the
workshop and their affiliation to various stakeholder groups.
Describe how you will take steps to adhere to the
multi-stakeholder principle, geographical diversity and gender
balance.<br>
- The Civil Society Internet Governance
Caucus (Civil society)<br>
- The Council of Europe – TBC
(Intergovernmental organization)<br>
- European Digital Rights (Civil society)<br>
- Knowledge Ecology International
(KEI/CPTech) – TBC (Civil<br>
society)<br>
- Ian Peter and Associates – TBC
(Private sector)<br>
Yet to be approached: Some governments (e.g. France, USA,
Netherlands, ...); other intergovernmental organizations (e.g. OSCE,
OCDE,...), other private sector constituencies (e.g. ISP
associations, newspaper associations, registrars, search
engine/social networking companies, ...); other civil society constituencies.<br>
5. Does the proposed workshop provide
different perspectives on<br>
the issues under discussion?<br>
Yes. Expertise is being sought from various areas to provide a
comprehensive coverage of issues and perspectives involved (to be
updated later).<br>
6. Please explain how the workshop will
address issues relating<br>
to Internet governance and describe how the workshop
conforms with the Tunis Agenda in terms of substance and the
mandate of the IGF.<br>
The first and foremost need for global Internet governance
arrangements comes from the global, cross-boundaries nature of the
Internet. Issues with global Internet governance are not only related
to critical Internet resources management, but also to the
circulation of content and data and to the protection of the
general communications infrastructure. Jurisdictions, control and
sovereignty issues are thus at the heart of global Internet
governance discussions. Given the difficulty to harmonize national
legislations, and given the issue of the competence of
jurisdictions, alternative methods to State regulations are more
and more considered, promoted and implemented. It is the very aim
of this workshop to explore and discuss these alternatives.<br>
TA: Para 72(b)(c)(g)(i)(k)<br>
7. List similar events you and/or any other
IGF workshops you<br>
have organized in the past.<br>
The Civil,Society Internet Governance Caucus and other sponsors
have organized workshops at previous IGF meetings (to be updated
later)<br>
8. Were you part of organizing a workshop last
year? Which one?<br>
Did you submit a workshop report?<br>
Yes (to be updated with list of previous workshops)<br>
9. Under which of the five IGF themes does the
proposal fall<br>
under ?<br>
• Managing the Internet (Using the
Internet)<br>
• Arrangements for Internet governance<br>
- - - - - D R A F T - - - - -<br>
____________________________________________________________<br>
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:<br>
<a href="mailto:governance@lists.cpsr.org"
target="_blank">governance@lists.cpsr.org</a><br>
To be removed from the list, send any message to:<br>
<a
href="mailto:governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org" target="_blank">governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org</a><br>
For all list information and functions, see:<br>
<a
href="http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance" target="_blank">http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance</a><br>
From: "Milton L Mueller" <<a
href="mailto:mueller@syr.edu" target="_blank">mueller@syr.edu</a>><br>
To: <<a href="mailto:governance@lists.cpsr.org" target="_blank">governance@lists.cpsr.org</a>><br>
Subject: [governance] Internationalization Workshop<br>
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 01:42:02 +0530<br>
<br>
<br>
Here is the proposal as it now stands. Note that after two
requests we<br>
are still waiting for volunteers/interested parties from this
list.<br>
1. Name of proposed workshop The Future of ICANN:
After the JPA, What?<br>
2. Provide a concise description of the proposed workshop
theme<br>
including its importance and relevance to the IGF.<br>
ICANN, which coordinates and sets policy for the global domain
name<br>
system (DNS) and IP addressing, is linked to the US Government<br>
through a<br>
Joint Project Agreement (JPA) that expires in September 2009. The
JPA<br>
and its renewal process provides what, during WSIS, became known
as<br>
"political oversight" over ICANN. The US government says
that it is<br>
committed to "completing the transition" to private
sector coordination<br>
of the Domain Name System, which implies an expiration of the JPA.<br>
During the recent mid-term review, ICANN made it clear that it
also<br>
strongly supports an end to the JPA. ICANN's call was supported by
some<br>
stakeholders, but others expressed concerns about ensuring its<br>
accountability without some kind of governmental oversight.<br>
This panel is designed to provide a careful and balanced
exploration of<br>
whether ICANN is ready to be free of US government oversight, and
if so<br>
what kind of external oversight - if any - should replace it.
Panelists<br>
will be encouraged to provide specific models for ICANN's status
and<br>
various oversight models and offer practical suggestions on how to
make<br>
changes in the current situation. Advocates of retaining the
status quo<br>
will also be represented. 3. Provide
the names and affiliations of the panellists you are<br>
planning<br>
to invite. Describe the main actors in the field and whether you
have<br>
you approached them about their willingness to participate in
proposed<br>
workshop. ICANN: Peter Dengate Thrush<br>
IGP: Milton Mueller<br>
Dr. Vladimir V. Sokolov, Moscow State University, Deputy Director,<br>
International Institute for<br>
Government of Canada<br>
Michael Palage, Attorney and former ICANN Board member<br>
Nashwa Abdel Baki, Egyptian Universities Network (EUN)<br>
<civil society representative selected by IGC><br>
Internet Society - either Stefano Trumpy or Lynn St. Amour<br>
Milton Mueller<br>
Professor, Syracuse University School of Information Studies<br>
XS4All Professor, Delft University of Technology<br>
------------------------------<br>
Internet Governance Project:<br>
<a href="http://internetgovernance.org" target="_blank">http://internetgovernance.org</a><br>
____________________________________________________________<br>
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:<br>
<a href="mailto:governance@lists.cpsr.org"
target="_blank">governance@lists.cpsr.org</a><br>
To be removed from the list, send any message to:<br>
<a
href="mailto:governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org" target="_blank">governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org</a><br>
For all list information and functions, see:<br>
<a
href="http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance" target="_blank">http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance</a><br>
From: "karen banks" <<a
href="mailto:karenb@gn.apc.org" target="_blank">karenb@gn.apc.org</a>><br>
To: <<a href="mailto:governance@lists.cpsr.org" target="_blank">governance@lists.cpsr.org</a>><br>
Subject: [governance] IGC workshop: A rights agenda for Internet<br>
Governance<br>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:41:15 +0530<br>
<br>
Dear all<br>
<br>
A working group comprised of the following folk have worked hard
to<br>
draft a proposal on:<br>
<br>
A rights agenda for internet goernance<br>
<br>
The working group included : Michael Gurstein, Parminder
Jeet<br>
Singh, Lisa Horner, Konstantinos Komaitis, Vittorio Bertola,
Robin<br>
Gross, Robert Guerra, rafik dammak, linda misek-falkoff and
myself.<br>
I believe posts were also shared from time to time with the bill
or<br>
rights coalition. (colleagues - please clarify any omissions i may<br>
have made in that list..)<br>
<br>
It was a very interesting drafting process, and we fully realise<br>
that this is a complex and challenging topic to bring to the IGF<br>
Table - but we are convinced that it is not only relevant to the
IGF<br>
Mandate, but central to the mandate and the long term impact of
the<br>
IGF process.<br>
<br>
Please review the attached draft - we look forward to your
comments<br>
in relation to<br>
<br>
- the substantive sections (q2 and q6)<br>
- ideas for panellists and main actors in the field (q3)<br>
- ideas for 2 or 3 additional co-sponsors (q4)<br>
- your thoughts on which theme(s) the proposal best fits with - i<br>
would say it's an 'missing' crosscut ;)<br>
<br>
we'll take a round of comments til end monday (april 28th) and
take<br>
it from there..<br>
<br>
thanks everyone<br>
<br>
karen (for michael, parminder and the working group)<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
____________________________________________________________<br>
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:<br>
<a href="mailto:governance@lists.cpsr.org" target="_blank">governance@lists.cpsr.org</a><br>
To be removed from the list, send any message to:<br>
<a href="mailto:governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org"
target="_blank">governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org</a><br>
<br>
For all list information and functions, see:<br>
<a href="http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance"
target="_blank">http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance</a><br>
From: "Jeremy Malcolm" <<a
href="mailto:Jeremy@Malcolm.id.au" target="_blank">Jeremy@Malcolm.id.au</a>><br>
To: <<a href="mailto:governance@lists.cpsr.org" target="_blank">governance@lists.cpsr.org</a>><br>
Subject: [governance] Workshop proposal: The Role and Mandate of
the IGF<br>
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 16:48:37 +0530<br>
<br>
A small working group comprising Lee McKnight, Karen Banks,
Baudouin Schombe and myself was recently convened by Parminder to
work on a proposal for a workshop for Hyderabad on "The Role
and Mandate of the IGF".<br>
Whilst not everyone in the working group has had the time to
consider this text (which myself, Baudouin and Parminder
contributed to), it is presented now due to pressure of time,
since the approval of the caucus is required before 30 April.<br>
Please send comments on the draft proposal to the list as soon as
possible. Thank you!<br>
--- begins ---<br>
Title of the Workshop: 'The role and mandate of the IGF'<br>
Civil Society Internet Caucus held a workshop on the same theme,
'The role and mandate of the IGF', at IGF, Rio. A report of this
first workshop is found athttp://<a
href="http://intgovforum.org/Rio_event_report.php" target="_blank">intgovforum.org/Rio_event_report.php</a>?<br>
mem=30. It was driven by an identification of a need for regular
self-<br>
appraisal of the IGF vis-à-vis its mandated role. Such a 'periodic
review' is also required by the Tunis Agenda (paragraph 73 b).
Consequently, the caucus proposes to hold a workshop with the same
title during IGF, Hyderabad.<br>
The role and mandate of the Internet Governance Forum were set out
in general terms at the World Summit on the Information Society,
particularly in paragraph 72 of the Tunis Agenda. However
since the conclusion of the World Summit, various interpretations
of this general statement of the IGF's role and mandate have been
put forward and continue to be debated amongst its stakeholders.
Some believe that there are elements of the IGF's mandate
that have been overlooked or minimised in its operation to date.
Others maintain, to the contrary, that the IGF must contain
the overreaching ambitions of those who would transform it from a
non-binding forum for discussion into something more.<br>
Since IGF, Hyderabad, represents the midpoint in the initial 5
year term of the IGF after which the whole IGF process is sought
to be reviewed. It will be pertinent at this midpoint to<br>
(1) review how the IGF has fared till
now vis-à-vis its TA mandate, and whether any structure and/or substance
corrections are needed for the remaining part of its initial 5
year mandate<br>
(2) what are the emerging views on
post-2010 arrangements for the IGF, if one is at all needed.<br>
There has been unmistakable improvements in the IGF format and
substance since its first meeting whether it has been to include
topics earlier considered too controversial (CIRs for Rio) or more
focused discussions on specific issues (as per tentative program
for Hyderabad). The directions of these changes vis-à-vis
fulfillment of the mandate of the IGF may also be an important
issue of discussion. Since paragraph 73 also speaks about a
'decentralized structure' it will also be worth exploring how can
the IGF be decentralized beyond the present structure of a single
annual event, perhaps by exploring IGF like structures at the
regional and national levels (which will inter aliafulfill part of
the requirements of paragraph 80) and working group working on
important issues contributing to the proceedings of the annual
event.<br>
-- Jeremy Malcolm LLB (Hons) B Com<br>
Internet and Open Source lawyer, IT consultant, actor<br>
host -t NAPTR 1.0.8.0.3.1.2.9.8.1.6.e164.org|awk -F! '{print $3}'<br>
____________________________________________________________<br>
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:<br>
<a href="mailto:governance@lists.cpsr.org"
target="_blank">governance@lists.cpsr.org</a><br>
To be removed from the list, send any message to:<br>
<a
href="mailto:governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org" target="_blank">governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org</a><br>
For all list information and functions, see:<br>
<a
href="http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance" target="_blank">http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
**be as a well......sure and limitless....<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'>but as time befits.....assume
other forms .... ***<br>
** ** *<br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal>____________________________________________________________<br>
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:<br>
<a href="mailto:governance@lists.cpsr.org" target="_blank">governance@lists.cpsr.org</a><br>
To be removed from the list, send any message to:<br>
<a href="mailto:governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org"
target="_blank">governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org</a><br>
<br>
For all list information and functions, see:<br>
<a href="http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance"
target="_blank">http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><br>
<br clear=all>
<br>
-- <br>
-------------------------------------------------<br>
"I meant to tell mankind . . . to attempt a quixotic adventure with no
resources<br>
beyond their native strength and sagacity. I had done it myself and found not<br>
only that the pearl of great price was worth far more than I possessed, but
that<br>
the very perils and privations of the Quest were themselves my dearest memories.<br>
I was certain of this at least: that nothing in the world except this was worth<br>
doing."<br>
- Aleister Crowley, The Confessions <br>
<br>
-------------------------------------------------<br>
Dr. Max Senges<br>
Stanford Post-Doc Visiting Scholar<br>
UOC Research Associate <br>
Freelance Consultant<br>
<br>
98 Loyola Ave., Menlo Park, California 94025<br>
<br>
US-Phone: (001) 650 714 9826<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.maxsenges.com">www.maxsenges.com</a><br>
<a href="http://www.knowledgeentrepreneur.com">www.knowledgeentrepreneur.com</a><br>
------------------------------------------------------------ <o:p></o:p></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
</body>
</html>