<html>
<body>
<font size=3>hi adam<br><br>
At 13:22 25/04/2008, Adam Peake wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">Karen, as I mentioned regarding
the Transboundary Internet workshop, the proposal does not need to be
complete for April 30. More compete the form the better, so don't
stop! But at this time you can make general comments rather than
specific. You don't need names of all who you want involved, just say who
you want involved, what point of view.</font></blockquote><br>
sure<br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite=""><font size=3>A straightforward
description of what the workshop will be about and what interests will be
represented will let us all see what issues people think important.
With the proposals and any discussion from the open consultation, the MAG
should be able to start more detailed discussion of the programme. We'll
all be able to see what other's are working on, perhaps join them, merge
ideas, etc.</font></blockquote><br>
the substantive sections are long, it's true.. but i don't want to dumb
it down too much as i think the text we have there is necessary to put
forward a case.. we talked about editing down the text - but
it's not easy - but, could have a go<br><br>
<font size=3>when you say 'straight forward description' - are you
implying that the text does not do that? ;)<br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">There's been a bit of discussion
about this on the MAG list and it's in the email digests of the MAG
discussions (which I guess people have stopped reading... they are pretty
dull.)
<<a href="http://intgovforum.org/forum/index.php?topic=426.0" eudora="autourl">
http://intgovforum.org/forum/index.php?topic=426.0</a>></blockquote>
<br>
thanks<br><br>
karen</font></body>
</html>