<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16640" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#000080 size=2>As a new subscriber's viewpoint, I
think that the discussion possibilities were clear from the beginning, and the
process was carried out well. tx. gp</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000080 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=ajp@glocom.ac.jp href="mailto:ajp@glocom.ac.jp">Adam Peake</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=governance@lists.cpsr.org
href="mailto:governance@lists.cpsr.org">governance@lists.cpsr.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, April 23, 2008 7:22
AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> RE: [governance] IGC Nomcom -
Slate of candidates</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>>Bill, Meryem and Adam<BR>><BR>>Thanks for your
engagement with the nomcom process. It is good to have these<BR>>open
discussions.<BR>><BR>>A couple of clarifications, as per what I
know.<BR>><BR>>First is the issue of developing criteria for nomination.
I gave repeated<BR>>calls, even set aside days, for the caucus to discuss
these criteria, and<BR>>requested the nomcom both to listen to the
conversation and pick up the<BR>>sense of the caucus, and ask specific
questions if found necessary. Though<BR>>such a discussion regarding a few
issues did take place a little earlier on<BR>>the list, in this period no
one came back to mention or reiterate her/his<BR>>views on criteria for
selection.<BR>><BR>>So I really do not know what you mean Adam when you
say<BR>><BR>>>We didn't even have chance to discuss the kind of
qualities we thought the<BR>>>nomcom should look for.<BR><BR><BR>I meant
that it wasn't clear there was any <BR>conclusion to our meandering
discussions and any <BR>instruction given to the nomcom. But what your
<BR>write below clarifies somewhat, thanks for
that.<BR><BR>Adam<BR><BR><BR><BR>>However still the nomcom was specifically
requested to pick the sense of the<BR>>caucus on this issue, and wherever
information/ clarification was sought<BR>>from co-coordinators they let
their view of the discussions on the list<BR>>known. <BR>><BR>>We
expect a detailed report from the nomcom which will address all
issues<BR>>raised
here.<BR>><BR>____________________________________________________________<BR>You
received this message as a subscriber on the list:<BR>
<A href="mailto:governance@lists.cpsr.org">governance@lists.cpsr.org</A><BR>To
be removed from the list, send any message to:<BR> <A
href="mailto:governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org">governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org</A><BR><BR>For
all list information and functions, see:<BR> <A
href="http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance">http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance</A></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>