<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 5/16/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Kieren McCarthy</b> <<a href="mailto:kierenmccarthy@gmail.com">kierenmccarthy@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
> ICANN meetings as well as those of the IGF have long streamed video<br>> and/or audio - allowing those not present to listen in, however<br>> virtually nothing has been done to allow the virtual audience to<br>
> engage the physical meeting. Panels and/or sessions that include<br>> virtual participants should be tried using well known, and well<br>> tested technologies.<br><br><br><br>I agree, but what are these technologies you're referring to?
<br><br>Marratech doesn't appear to scale well - more than five people and there are<br>issues. And it needs heavy bandwidth.<br><br>Streaming technologies are expensive and complex and don't provide<br>sufficient interaction. Chatrooms are good for chat but for some reason
<br>don't stretch over into deliberation. Ad hoc systems have an extraordinary<br>habit of falling over.<br><br>Real-time interaction remains extremely difficult to achieve because it<br>requires people to be able to hear all that happens - something that is a
<br>consistent problem - because the disconnect is still physically there. Also<br>because it is difficult for a physical presence (an arm raised, a nod to the<br>chair) to be reproduced effectively online. And because a chair has
<br>tremendous difficulty following things offline and online at the same time.<br>And so on.<br><br>Is David Allen on this list? He has much more experience than I do in these<br>matters.<br><br>But very far from saying this is not possible, I am thoroughly committed to
<br>find practical solutions to this issue of effective remote participation.<br><br>If you could provide a list of software you think might be useful in this<br>area, I *guarantee* you that they will be put through proper testing and any
<br>that survive real-world scenarios will be pushed for use both within the IGF<br>and ICANN contexts.</blockquote><div><br><br>Ask Leo what RIPE do. they have the best online participation stuff of all the RIR's, tho ARIN and now AfriNIC not far behind.
<br><br></div></div><br>-- <br>Cheers,<br><br>McTim<br>$ whois -h <a href="http://whois.afrinic.net">whois.afrinic.net</a> mctim<br>