[governance] Good examples of muiltistakeholder policy development at a national level?

[Ian Peter]

Hi Sylvain,

I dont think the Internet Society has any inclusive, multistakeholder or 
bottom up approach. I don't think it even pretends to any more.

But perhaps things might change, we live in hope.

For anyone who is not aware of the recent sale of the Public Interest 
Registry by ISOC to a for profit venture capital company, happy to 
provide some references. It is being discussed in a few places, perhaps 
a response here might be appropriate as well (but please start a new 
topic!)

Ian Peter



------ Original Message ------
From: "Sylvain Baya" <governance at lists.riseup.net>
To: "IGCaucus" <governance at lists.riseup.net>
Sent: 18/11/2019 11:16:42 PM
Subject: [governance] Good examples of muiltistakeholder policy 
development at a national level?

>Hi all,
>
>Hope you are well.
>...i'm following this thread from the beginning and, i found it 
>instructive. So thanks to y'all !
>
>I want to add more variance (maybe off-topic; then i apologize), if 
>allowed, please :-)
>
>...so, question :
>What about the implementation of inclusiveness/multistakeholder, and 
>bottom-up approach, by
>InternetSociety.ORG ?
>
>Thanks.
>
>Shalom,
>--sb.
>
>Le lundi 4 novembre 2019, Ian Peter <ian.peter at ianpeter.com> a écrit :
>>Yes, the discussion sure has varied, but lots of interesting inputs.
>>
>>I found Miltons history of multistakeholderism quite interesting - in 
>>that the term was not invented to apply at a national level where 
>>presumably things were always going well, but was intended to apply to 
>>the global dimension where there was a presumed problem.
>>
>>Nevertheless - how do we get civil society involved effectively at a 
>>national level? Lots of interesting examples here, but it would be 
>>great to pull out some best practice examples, or some principles for 
>>civil society involvement, that  people could use to suggest to their 
>>governments effective ways of doing things.
>>
>>Ian
>>
>>------ Original Message ------
>>From: "Andrés Piazza" <governance at lists.riseup.net>
>>To: arsenebaguma at gmail.com
>>Cc: 6.internet at gmail.com; "Izumi Aizu" <iza at anr.org>; "Ang Peng Hwa 
>>(Prof)" <TPHANG at ntu.edu.sg>; "CWCS (IGC)" 
>><governance at lists.riseup.net>
>>Sent: 4/11/2019 10:44:23 AM
>>Subject: Re: [governance] Good examples of muiltistakeholder policy 
>>development at a national level?
>>
>>>Despite the original purpose of this discussion has evolved, I still 
>>>wanted to name the IXPs in Argentina with CABASE adding other 
>>>stakeholders and, more recently, multisectorial Blockchain initiative 
>>>BFA.AR
>>>
>>>Andrés
>>>
>>>El dom., 3 nov. 2019 a las 13:18, Arsène Tungali 
>>>(<governance at lists.riseup.net>) escribió:
>>>>[...]
>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>Andrés Piazza
>>>@andrespiazza
>
>
>--
>
>--
>Best Regards !
>baya.sylvain [AT cmNOG DOT cm] | <https://www.cmnog.cm> | 
><https://survey.cmnog.cm>
>Subscribe to Mailing List : 
><https://lists.cmnog.cm/mailman/listinfo/cmnog/>
>__
>#‎LASAINTEBIBLE‬|‪#‎Romains15‬:33«Que LE ‪#‎DIEU‬ de ‪#‎Paix‬ soit avec 
>vous tous! ‪#‎Amen‬!»
>‪#‎MaPrière‬ est que tu naisses de nouveau. #Chrétiennement‬
>«Comme une biche soupire après des courants d’eau, ainsi mon âme 
>soupire après TOI, ô DIEU!» (#Psaumes42:2)
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20191119/ad7891d7/attachment.htm>