[governance] On the death of neo-liberalism

[willi uebelherr]

Dear Suresh,

the real question is, do we need a market? Or can we create, what we
need, directly?

Every market have some conditions. We never can compare this market
propagandism today with that, was people in some rural environments
today and in our history organized.

But always we have to look, who are the actors, with what intentions and
under what conditions.

That Anriette glorified market strategies, i don't understand. That you
do it, i understand.

many greetings, willi
Manaus, Brasil


Am 01/06/2016 um 20:59 schrieb Suresh Ramasubramanian:
> Please don't confuse market liberalism with laissez faire, to borrow an old and rather overused term.   Any sort of market whatsoever is subject to regulation and taxation and is also subject to national laws against cartelization, corruption etc
>
> --srs
>
>> On 02-Jun-2016, at 3:59 AM, Anriette Esterhuysen <anriette at apc.org> wrote:
>>
>> Market liberalism, if well regulated in the public interest, can be a
>> positive force and I do believe in the value of competition in many
>> contexts.
>

---
Este email foi escaneado pelo Avast antivírus.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t