[governance] U.S. Court Quashes Attempts to Attach ccTLDs: Federal Judge Agrees with ICANN

[parminder]

The real issue is not just whether a particular US court decided this 
way or that.  The issue is whether the world can have one of its key 
global resources be subject to the courts of one country, which of 
course operates that particular country's law, whether or not based on 
that country's people's will. Is this appropriate?

parminder


On Thursday 13 November 2014 07:47 AM, McTim wrote:
> So ccTLDs aren't property after all....
>
> https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2-2014-11-12-en
>
> -- 
> Cheers,
>
> McTim
> "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A 
> route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20141113/6a4bac20/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t