[governance] Re: [bestbits] NetMundial Alliance

[Seth Johnson]

. . . and whatever they come up with on this IANA transition bit.


Seth

On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 6:27 AM, Seth Johnson <seth.p.johnson at gmail.com> wrote:
> Can someone post the GAC Communique referenced in the forward below
> here so I can access it via gmail and not have to wait to get my Net
> back?  Or directly to me?
>
>
> Seth
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: ICANN News Alert <communications at icann.org>
> Date: Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 5:45 AM
> Subject: ICANN News Alert -- GAC Communiqué Issued at ICANN Meeting in London
> To: seth.p.johnson at gmail.com
>
>
> ICANN News Alert
>
> https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-06-26-en
>
> ____________________________________
>
>
> GAC Communiqué Issued at ICANN Meeting in London
>
> 26 June 2014
>
> The Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC) today issued its communiqué
> during ICANN's 50th public meeting in London. To download a copy,
> click here (https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/gac-to-board-25jun14-en.pdf)
> [PDF, 139 KB].
>
> ____________________________________
>
> This message was sent to seth.p.johnson at gmail.com from:
> ICANN | 12025 Waterfront Drive
> Suite 300 | Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536
>
> Manage Your Subscription:
> http://app.icontact.com/icp/mmail-mprofile.pl?r=23849747&l=6333&s=RV31&m=940566&c=165637
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 6:20 AM, Seth Johnson <seth.p.johnson at gmail.com> wrote:
>> The icann site (and other unrelated sites) apparently returns an "out
>> of memory" error for me. I get into only a few select sites, gmail,
>> facebook, but no others.  Never mind, my cross to bear.  And I think
>> I'm "set" and I don't need to worry much.  Let's see where we're at
>> end of the day . . .
>>
>>
>> Seth.
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 5:39 AM, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> sent from Google nexus 4
>>> kindly excuse brevity and typos.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 26 Jun 2014 10:35, "Seth Johnson" <seth.p.johnson at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Anyone else having trouble getting into meetings.icann.org this morning?
>>>>
>>> Got in this morning... Via mobile.
>>>
>>>> Kind of important to be present today.
>>>>
>>> You bet it is ;)
>>>
>>> Cheers!
>>>
>>>
>>>> Seth
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thursday, June 26, 2014, William Drake <wjdrake at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello from ICANN London
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jun 25, 2014, at 3:05 AM, Joana Varon <joana at varonferraz.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> it would also be interesting to know the latest positions at the GAC
>>>>>> about the transition process. Have anyone written anything about it?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  the GAC Communiqué  is here:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://gacweb.icann.org/download/attachments/27132037/GAC%20London%20Commu
>>>>> nique%20FINAL%20.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1403767077808&api=v2
>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 7:33 PM, Nnenna Nwakanma <nnenna75 at gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi people
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Who was in the GAC/Board meeting today when ICANN President announced
>>>>>>>> a "NetMundial Alliance" in London at ICANN50?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Fadi has been musing privately about this since at least September but
>>>>> the concept is still evolving, so the announcement now was an interesting
>>>>> decision.  NCUC had the US delegation visit our Tuesday meeting for an hour
>>>>> and when I asked about it, Larry Strickling said they were as surprised as
>>>>> anyone by the announcement and looking forward to hearing more.  A rep of
>>>>> another presumably relevant entity I asked said pretty much the same.  One
>>>>> that’s not here seems to know more, so probably the conversation is being
>>>>> evolved piecemeal.
>>>>>
>>>>> Without wanting to put words in his mouth, basically Fadi seems to think
>>>>> that a new multistakeholder configuration of (what he sees as) key
>>>>> governments and nongovernmental actors is needed to carry forward the
>>>>> NETmundial agenda.  The argument has been put to him that such an effort
>>>>> would likely be more divisive than useful if it’s constructed on a selective
>>>>> rather than inclusive basis and is decoupled from other processes/forums
>>>>> than enjoy broad legitimacy.  Hopefully he’ll take these and related
>>>>> considerations on board going forward, guess we’ll see.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best
>>>>>
>>>>> Bill
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ____________________________________________________________
>>>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>>>      bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
>>>> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>>>>      http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t