[governance] Potential IGC letter to US gov (was Re: NET NEUTRALITY AND MORE)

[McTim]

Riaz,

On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Riaz K Tayob <riaz.tayob at gmail.com> wrote:
> Who and where?
> If US, as per previous posts, you hold that the US laws are sufficient?
> Even if yes, would this be legitimate? Who would confer such legitimacy?
> DOC?

At what point did the USG involvement in administration of Internet
resources become illegitimate?  Certainly, one can't argue that in a
completely US funded network of networks research program that a USG
role in administration was illegitimate, so it had to be at some point
in its evolution.  Can you name that point?


-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t