[governance] Industrial Progress, revisited…

[Andrea Glorioso]

Thanks for. A few more questions to clarify.

On May 19, 2013 1:18 AM, "McTim" <dogwallah at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Andrea Glorioso
> <andrea at digitalpolicy.it> wrote:
> >
> > Who is the "we" here?
>
> Those of us who participate in the BUTOC (Bottom Up, Transparent,
> Open, Consensus) based processes of IG.

So is being BUTOC a necessary condition for a process to be
multi-stakeholder? Is it also a sufficient condition?

Thanks,

Andrea
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20130519/98820b0a/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t