[governance] IGF conclusions

[Vittorio Bertola]

I've just heard from Markus that there is no way that anything discussed 
or agreed in a workshop can get into the IGF's official conclusions, as 
per a decision by the AG. Do our AG members confirm this?

As a workshop organizer, and as a participant who was not on any panel 
and was never given the floor at any plenary session, I'd find this 
quite troubling. I had 100 people in my workshop lively discussing for 
100 minutes - and it was a discussion, not like some workshops in which 
panelists spoke for 85 minutes and then one 30 seconds comment was 
allowed from the floor - and I would like to leave some trace of it into 
the official summary.

I'm no fan of formal stuff, but still I'm troubled by the continued 
restrictions of this IGF. How can we actually get some input from the 
bottom into the final acts?

And, I hope that the final documents don't dare to include 
"recommendations" that were never presented or discussed with anyone...
-- 
vb.             [Vittorio Bertola - v.bertola [a] bertola.eu.org]<-----
http://bertola.eu.org/  <- Prima o poi...
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance