[governance] suggested changes to chairs paper, paras 45 and 65

karen banks karenb at gn.apc.org
Sun Nov 6 17:00:31 EST 2005


hi

yes - you should get it out as soon as possible - i spoke to the UK 
about this para and they are willing to consider..

karen

At 17:31 06/11/2005, Adam Peake (ajp at glocom.ac.jp) wrote:
>No, the sooner we get the text in the sooner people will read it. It's
>also a slight different type of contribution, more procedural in that
>govt. have to agree to opening text before they will consider what we
>have to say in substance.
>
>Adam
>
>
>On 11/7/05, Vittorio Bertola <vb at bertola.eu.org> wrote:
> >
> > Il giorno 06/nov/05, alle ore 13:25, Adam Peake (ajp at glocom.ac.jp) ha
> > scritto:
> >
> > > Any objections to this suggestion? I'll send to the secretariat
> > > tomorrow (about 18 hours from the date stamp on this email.)
> >
> > Wouldn't it be better if we sent all our wording suggestions together?
> > --
> > vb.             [Vittorio Bertola - v.bertola [a] bertola.eu.org]<-----
> > http://bertola.eu.org/  <- Prima o poi...
> >
> >
>
>_______________________________________________
>governance mailing list
>governance at lists.cpsr.org
>https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance



_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance



More information about the Governance mailing list