<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>Parm, all this fuzz just to expel Nick??</div><div><br></div><div>--c.a.<br><br>sent from a dumbphone</div><div><br>On 24/05/2015, at 09:31, parminder <<a href="mailto:parminder@itforchange.net">parminder@itforchange.net</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<font face="Verdana">Ian, and reps of civil society networks on the
Civil Society Coordination Group (CSCG) ,<br>
<br>
I propose that CSCG sets up a civil society transparency project,
somewhat on the lines of the EU Transparency Register, pl see
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://ec.europa.eu/transparencyregister/public/homePage.do">http://ec.europa.eu/transparencyregister/public/homePage.do</a> .<br>
<br>
It should in fact go beyond the EU initiative which is a general
one for all lobbying groups, whereas we here are concerned with
civil society which should set the highest example of transparency
and accountability. The 'register' can have self filled
information on objectives of an organisation, principles followed
by it, if any, its funding, partners, and so on.... <br>
<br>
This is at present just my proposal, but I hope one or more civil
society networks in the IG space can own it and push it... CSCG
would be well placed to run this project as a neutral space so
that there is no accusation of bias that any such initiative is
being employed for partisan purposes. In any case, a simple
initiative for openness, transparency and accountability can hardly
be partisan.<br>
<br>
The register can have optional higher level features whereby a
group/ org can declare its means of public accountability, whether
and how its internal governance is done, how matters can be taken
by with their oversight bodies, like board etc, and whether they
have any means whereby they respond to public question on their
work, etc.<br>
<br>
For such genuine cases where such transparency can harm an
organisations work, or security, such organisations, and only such
organisations, can be exempted employing a clear process and set
of criteria.<br>
<br>
Remember, both the UN report on improvements to the IGF and the
NetMundial Statement highlight the issue of transparency. I also
recently read in these lists how we should make bridges with the
OpenGov movement which is almost wholly about this one thing. Time
we begin practising what we preach. <br>
<br>
I look forward to hear responses to this proposal..<br>
<br>
parminder <br>
</font>
</div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>____________________________________________________________</span><br><span>You received this message as a subscriber on the list:</span><br><span> <a href="mailto:bestbits@lists.bestbits.net">bestbits@lists.bestbits.net</a>.</span><br><span>To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:</span><br><span> <a href="http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits">http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits</a></span></div></blockquote></body></html>