<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.MsoPlainText, li.MsoPlainText, div.MsoPlainText
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Plain Text Char";
margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
span.PlainTextChar
{mso-style-name:"Plain Text Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Plain Text";
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-CA link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72"><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoPlainText>I think what you mean below is not "a consensus on the understanding and role of democracy in the context of the internet" but rather a consensus on how to effectively <b><i>operationalize</i></b> democracy in the context of the Internet something with which I (and the JNC) completely agree and which we have been advocating for a long time.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>Further, I think that even in the absence of a fully formed consensus on the definition of “democracy” there seems, at least based on my quotes from Mr. Mandela and the US State Department, sufficient comfort in a working definition of democracy that Mr. Mandela would commit his life to the endeavour and the US-State Department would make it a fundamental pillar of US foreign policy. Based on this, presumably “we” could have sufficient comfort to “force” it into international documents.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>The same, I should add cannot in any sense be said for multistakeholderism, a concept which even its strongest advocates acknowledge is ill-formed, shape shifting from context to context and lacks any consistent definition either in theory or in practice.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>M<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US style='mso-fareast-language:EN-CA'>-----Original Message-----<br>From: Benedek, Wolfgang (wolfgang.benedek@uni-graz.at) [mailto:wolfgang.benedek@uni-graz.at] <br>Sent: March 7, 2015 6:02 AM<br>To: governance@lists.igcaucus.org; Michael Gurstein<br>Subject: Re: [governance] [bestbits] Remarks at UNESCO Closing Ceremony of "Connecting the Dots Conference"</span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>First to make my position clear I'm myself an advocate of democratic governance and a holistic approach to human rights although not as an alternative to multistakeholderism, the potential of which in my view still needs to be developed.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>Second I have myself proposed in writing to the Secretariat to include certain language on global citizenship education, a concept supported by the UN Secretary General and developed very actively in the educational sector of UNECO while only mentioned once in the UNESCO study to resolve ethical issues in cyberspace. Finally, the concept was only mentioned without any elaboration. And I'm aware that several other proposals made by others were not taken up at all.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>Regarding the baggage issue, I'm not an insider to these discussions, I have no problem with appeals to democratic values, but I'm aware that the concept of democracy has also been misused a lot in history, take the examples of the former German Democratic Republic(GDR), the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) or the Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea. It would be good to work for a consensus on the understanding and role of democracy in the context of the internet among civil society and academia first before forcing it into international documents.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>Wolfgang Benedek<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>Am 07.03.15 14:01 schrieb "Michael Gurstein" unter <<a href="mailto:gurstein@gmail.com"><span style='color:windowtext;text-decoration:none'>gurstein@gmail.com</span></a>>:<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>>And to be very clear, in the case of "democracy" it wasn't simply a <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>>matter of the concept "not making it into the final document" but <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>>rather that those involved made the clear political choice to promote <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>>"multistakeholderism" and suppress "democracy".<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>>M<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>>-----Original Message-----<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>>From: <a href="mailto:governance-request@lists.igcaucus.org"><span style='color:windowtext;text-decoration:none'>governance-request@lists.igcaucus.org</span></a><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>>[<a href="mailto:governance-request@lists.igcaucus.org"><span style='color:windowtext;text-decoration:none'>mailto:governance-request@lists.igcaucus.org</span></a>] On Behalf Of Norbert <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>>Klein<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>>Sent: March 7, 2015 3:45 AM<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>>To: <a href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org"><span style='color:windowtext;text-decoration:none'>governance@lists.igcaucus.org</span></a><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>>Subject: Re: [governance] [bestbits] Remarks at UNESCO Closing Ceremony <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>>of "Connecting the Dots Conference"<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>>On 03/07/2015 02:30 PM, Benedek, Wolfgang <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>>(<a href="mailto:wolfgang.benedek@uni-graz.at"><span style='color:windowtext;text-decoration:none'>wolfgang.benedek@uni-graz.at</span></a>)<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>>wrote:<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>>> As a participant and speaker in the UNESCO conference Connecting the<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>>> dots: Options for future action in Paris I think it is important to <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>>> put the record straight: the main purpose of the conference was to <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>>> give feedback to the UNESCO draft Internet study and advise on the <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>>> future priorities in this field. This was done in several plenary and<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>>> 16 breakout sessions in a MSH-approach quite successfully.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>>> The fact that two concepts important to some did not make it into the <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>>> outcome document should not be overestimated as this is all work in <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>>> progress. Also other concepts dear to others were not or only partly <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>>> included. I also do not remember that these concepts were elaborated <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>>> on during the sessions or panels in any significant way in order to <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>>> deepen their understanding.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>>><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>>> Wolfgang Benedek<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>>><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>>Dear Mr. Benedek,<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>>thanks for this, for this type of, clarification - using only <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>>formalities like "Also other concepts dear to others were not or only <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>>partly included."<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>>I cannot easily imagine what kind of "other concept" of a similar <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>>importance and weight could be lined up with "democracy." I would <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>>appreciate it if you, as a participant in this UNESCO conference, could <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>>share some of these "other concepts" which were also not, or only <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>>partially, included.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>>Thanks in advance,<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>>Norbert Klein<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>>Cambodia<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></p></div></body></html>