<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div class="">By now everyone will have read from previous threads that ISOC and the Just Net Coalition (JNC) have both decided not to participate in the NETmundial Initiative, and you may have also have read some false information that Best Bits and other networks represented on the Civil Society Coordination Group (CSCG) *have* decided to participate. As Ian Peter's clarifying message setting out the truth of the matter should have made clear, that is *not* the case. All that has happened is that the we have obtained as much assurance as we can that *if* we decide to participate, then the Secretariat (ICANN, WEF and <a href="http://CGI.br" class="">CGI.br</a>) will accept our self-nomination process rather than choosing civil society representatives independently.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Now we turn to you, our communities, to provide us with guidance about whether to proceed further or not. Some views have already been expressed pro and con. I have been (and remain) publicly critical about the NETmundial Initiative, but on the other hand the reasoning ISOC and JNC give for boycotting it is rather specious, because they characterise the initiative as being something that it doesn't purport to be - ie. a single central policy-making body for Internet governance. This is an alarmist critique that turns the NETmundial Initiative into an exaggerated ITU-style bogeyman.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">So whilst there is certainly room for disagreement about whether we should bestow the benefit of our participation on the Initiative (I remain deeply conflicted about this), let's decide on the basis of factual pro and con arguments rather than oversimplifications about the 1% taking over the Internet. Also note that a few civil society representatives, including Human Rights Watch, have endorsed it already and are featured on the carousel message on the front page of <a href="http://netmundial.org" class="">netmundial.org</a>.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">So what do people think? If you haven't already shared your views, please do so on this thread, within the next few days if possible.</div><br class=""><div apple-content-edited="true" class="">
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div class="">-- </div><div class="">Jeremy Malcolm</div><div class="">Senior Global Policy Analyst</div><div class="">Electronic Frontier Foundation</div><a href="https://eff.org" class="">https://eff.org</a><br class="">jmalcolm@eff.org<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Tel: 415.436.9333 ext 161</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">:: Defending Your Rights in the Digital World ::</div></div></div>
</div>
<br class=""></body></html>