<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<br>
<font face="Verdana">And if there indeed is real ignorance and
people want to know what a neo-liberal model of global Internet
governance looks like just read the below interview of the CEO of
ICANN. He lays it all out rather well<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2014/10/07/internet-operations-chief-snowden-disclosures-make-my-job-easier/">http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2014/10/07/internet-operations-chief-snowden-disclosures-make-my-job-easier/</a><br>
<br>
It is this model that the Best Bits statement helps push forward.
There can simply be no doubt in it. <br>
<br>
And people will need to choose which side they would want to be at
this crucial juncture - on the side of slow ( perhaps even
painfully slow) evolving democratic governance of our collective
global affairs including the Internet, or shifting over to
neoliberal governance by the elite.. And if they side with this
structural shift to neolib governance today, it will be for keeps.
We are in a real danger of loosing our democratic traditions. At
the very least, this requires deep thinking on the part of all of
us. <br>
<br>
parminder <br>
<br>
parminder <br>
<br>
<br>
</font>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On Wednesday 22 October 2014 07:17 PM,
michael gurstein wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:0cf501cfedfe$a9bd5f30$fd381d90$@gmail.com"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered
medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Helvetica;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Helvetica;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Consolas;
panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Verdana;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Lucida Grande";
panose-1:0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";
color:black;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
pre
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted Char";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Courier New";
color:black;}
p.MsoAcetate, li.MsoAcetate, div.MsoAcetate
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text Char";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:8.0pt;
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";
color:black;}
span.HTMLPreformattedChar
{mso-style-name:"HTML Preformatted Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted";
font-family:Consolas;
color:black;}
span.BalloonTextChar
{mso-style-name:"Balloon Text Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text";
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";
color:black;}
span.EmailStyle21
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Further
to Parminder’s comments below.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">I
recently published a <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://gurstein.wordpress.com/2014/10/19/democracy-or-multi-stakeholderism-competing-models-of-governance/">blogpost</a>
(also please not the comments) where I argued that the
democratic model of “governance by and for the people” is in
direct conflict/competition with the multi-stakeholder model
of “governance by and for stakeholders”.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">I
am fully aware that presenting these contrasting positions
in such a way is highly simplistic but I also think that
there is a value in simplicity particularly where it removes
the obfuscation that often masks fundamental positions and
values.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">I
think that the division within Civil Society and I would
argue more broadly in the larger world between those who
believe in a democratic approach to governance including in
areas as central to our experience, well-being and future as
the Internet and those who would give this governance over
to decision making by those with specific “interests/stakes”
in the outcome (and where the broad public interest if
represented at all would be only one among many such
competing “stakes”) is a fundamental one.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">It
is extremely disappointing to see such broad swathes of
“civil society” and others opting for a position that does
not support democracy and democratic governance however and
in what manner that might be achieved.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">M<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF
1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext">From:</span></b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext">
IRP
[<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:irp-bounces@lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org">mailto:irp-bounces@lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org</a>]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>parminder<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, October 21, 2014 9:06 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Anne Jellema; <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:rhill@hill-a.ch">rhill@hill-a.ch</a><br>
<b>Cc:</b> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:bestbits@lists.bestbits.net">bestbits@lists.bestbits.net</a>; IRP;
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a>;
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:forum@justnetcoalition.org">forum@justnetcoalition.org</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [IRPCoalition] [JNC - Forum]
[bestbits] Time-sensitive: 24 hour sign on period for
ITU Plenipot joint recommendations<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Tuesday 21 October 2014 09:28 PM, Anne
Jellema wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Thank you, Parminder for the thoughtful
criticisms. We're aware that different parts of civil
society have well-founded reasons for holding different
opinions on the role of the ITU, and we fully respect
these. I was very pleased to see that JustNet has
expressed its point of view in its own proposals for the
Plenipot, which I found interesting and valuable. <o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">In that spirit, I would like to
respond to a couple of your criticisms of our
statement that I think don't reflect an entirely
accurate reading of its content: <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">- I think your claim that we are
advocating unregulated free markets is unfair, since
we state twice: "Each country should retain
individual authority to regulate IP interconnection
rates where necessary and advisable in order to
ensure universal service and promote robust
competition." The drafters include organisations
that have been on the forefront of the fight for
stronger net neutrality regulation at national and
regional (EU) level.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">- I don't agree that our
statement fails to identify who should take
responsibility for resolving key IG challenges;
proposes the "withdrawal of all internet policy
related agenda from the global governance stage";
or fails to acknowledge any important role for the
ITU. We repeatedly stress the need for
coordination and collaboration among UN agencies
(including the ITU) and multistakeholder bodies;
and refer several times to what we think are the
ITU's critical roles in addressing the huge
challenges ahead. <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">That said, we agree that the
reference to "ITU mission creep" was poorly judged,
and the entire para should be deleted as proposed by
Jeanette. <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">I sincerely hope that a respectful
and informed exchange of views can continue among CSOs,
along with the equally important effort to find the
common ground between differing positions. <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><br>
Dear Anne<br>
<br>
Thanks for your response and engagement. I mean to further
engage on this discussion. But my present email will only
make one point, about the mutual respectfulness of any
discussion, which your email mentions. I am not saying that
you meant it in that manner, but I do often find a hyper
sensitivity to political criticism in these circles and
personalisation of it, here I mean personalisation in
receiving political criticism. We must recognise that civil
society work is a work of strong conviction and submersion in
that conviction... People have a vision of the world they'd
like to see, and there are forces that block the realisation
of that vision. Obviously therefore, for anyone who really
cares, the feelings involved are strong... And I mean, on all
sides of what could become a political divide. And such a
political divide is as possible, even likely, in the civil
society space, as in the conventional political space.
However, for instance in India, which has a rather high level
of professional in traditional political space, at least at
the national level, political personalities are able to be
scathing and unsparing in terms of their political positions
and counter positions without it being taken as being
inappropriately uncivil or any such thing. <br>
<br>
I probably should not be so defensive, but I say all this
because many people here are simply too touchy. (I know that
you come from a core political civil society background, and
so I an really not talking about you.) I also say it because I
and people that I work with feel that the present position
that is being proposed on the BestBits platform a major
political statement that we find extremely problematic and
something that sets a solid tone for a neoliberal paradigm for
the emerging Internet-mediated society. In that respect its
impact on the world, especially in terms of democracy, equity
and social justice is going to be far reaching, and these are
the corner stone canons of our work. And therefore we will
strongly contest it, with all means at our disposal. <br>
<br>
I will separately respond to some substantive points in your
above email. <br>
<br>
best regards<br>
parminder <br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Best<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Anne<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:49 PM,
Richard Hill <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:rhill@hill-a.ch" target="_blank">rhill@hill-a.ch</a>>
wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:blue">I
fully agree with Parminder's analysis and strongly
support his comments.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:blue">Best,</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:blue">Richard</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid blue
1.5pt;padding:0in 0in 0in
4.0pt;margin-left:3.75pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span
style="font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">-----Original
Message-----<br>
<b>From:</b> Forum [mailto:<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:forum-bounces@justnetcoalition.org"
target="_blank">forum-bounces@justnetcoalition.org</a>]<b>On
Behalf Of </b>parminder<br>
<b>Sent:</b> mardi, 21. octobre 2014 12:47<br>
<b>To:</b> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:bestbits@lists.bestbits.net"
target="_blank">bestbits@lists.bestbits.net</a>;
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org"
target="_blank">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a>;
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:forum@justnetcoalition.org"
target="_blank">forum@justnetcoalition.org</a>;
IRP<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [JNC - Forum] [bestbits]
Time-sensitive: 24 hour sign on period for ITU
Plenipot joint recommendations</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><br>
<span
style="font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif"">I
have not had the chance to go into the long
statement in detail. However, what I see as its
main refrain is bothersome. It says yes there
are many very important global Internet policy
issues, and then says that the ITU should not
take them up, but tells us nothing about who
should take them up. This becomes a recipe for,
or at least, towards a political governance free
world, the kind one nowadays read about
frequently in the documents of the World
Economic Forum (read for instance its Global
Redesign Initiative). <br>
<br>
I am agnostic about whether ITU takes up at
least some important Internet policy issues at
the global level or some other democratic global
body takes them up. However, it is not tenable
that they be just left hanging out there, which
only allows those who have the greatest default
power on the Internet, mostly the US based
economic and political establishment, to carry
on consolidating their power. This statement for
me is simply an expression of support for the
Internet power status quo, and therefore I
strongly oppose it.<br>
<br>
To take a few examples (a more detailed critique
will follow);<br>
<br>
Perhaps the most disturbing part of the
statement, from developing countries viewpoint,
is tha which sanctifies unregulated global
market models for global Internet
inter-connectivity.... This is a major reversal
from the stand of all developing countries and
all progressive civil society at the WSIS, where
unfair global interconnection regimes was one of
the main 'development issues'. This statement
seems to close that issue by declaring that such
things be best left to free markets, with no
regulatory framework, or even a normative/
principles framework. In any case, it is not
clear how even working on the interconnection
issue, an express mandate for ITU from the WSIS
is a 'mission creep' for the ITU. It appears
that there is not one thing that ITU can do in
2014 which will not be called a mission creep.
In the circumstances one thinks that the
proponents of the statement should be bold and
just ask for the closing down of the ITU. <br>
<br>
Further, the statement says that the ITU should
not work towards a treaty on cyber- security, an
issue that has shaken the world post Snowden.
Just today I read an interview with Snowden's
colleague Laura Poitras about how little has
really changed on the ground as far as mass
surveillance by the five eyes is concerned. What
other than a treaty that reigns in the conduct
of the states in this regard can be a solution?
Or have we simply given up and are ready to
allow the powerful to do what they may?
Alternatively, is there any other solution being
thought of? Civil society must answer these
questions. <br>
<br>
The statement seems to suggest that the first
committee of the UN Gen Assembly should keep
doing the work on cyber security. That is quite
surprising becuase by all means, the first
committee’s work is much less participative (of
other stakeholders) than even of the ITU. So,
what is the rationale here, other than just to
say ITU should not do it (we will see when we
have to stop even the first committee from doing
it, but right now the imperative is.... ). I am
fine with the first committee doing it, but
remember that any effort towards a cyber
security treaty will require the expertise of
ITU which is the agency that has hitherto dealt
with this issue. Such an simply obstructionist
attitude to global governance bespeaks of a
movement towards a very unequal, unfair and
unjust world. Progressive civil society must
take note rather than blindly signing on this
rather dangerous statement. <br>
<br>
The statement says, we should not begin working
on a cyber security treaty because there is no
consensus on basic concepts and principles in
the area.... Is there a greater consensus on the
area of climate change, and so many other areas.
Do we just give up in these areas? if not, why
in the area of Internet governance? Consensus on
concepts and principles emerge as a part of a
process towards development of global principles
and agreements and not a as a pre condition of
them. This is universally known. One can
understand why US wants to protect the status
quo, but why civil society? <br>
<br>
Again, this is simply a statement for
maintaining the Internet power status quo...
Dont do it at the ITU, but we wont tell you
where to do either.... Supporting this statement
in my view will simply be to support the global
Internet status quo....<br>
<br>
Yes, we need to reform the ITU, but seeking
simple withdrawal of all Internet policy related
agenda from global governance stage is very
problematic. As this agenda is withdrawn from
the global stage, the dominant political and
economic forces get a free reign, and the little
policy that needs to be made is made at
plurilateral forums like the OECD, or the
Trans-Pacific Partnership or TPP (see for
instance, just the day before's news, <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://infojustice.org/archives/33428"
target="_blank">http://infojustice.org/archives/33428</a>,
on how TPP seeks to regulate global IP TV
transmissions). <br>
<br>
Such statements as this one simply clear the way
for such rule of the economically and
politically powerful...<br>
<br>
parminder<br>
</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Tuesday 21 October 2014
02:08 AM, Anne Jellema wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote
style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Dear colleagues <o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">As
you know, a fluid working group was
formed after the IGF to try to come up
with joint recommendations for the ITU
Plenipot. We produced the open letter on
transparency and participation in the
Plenipot process itself, which many of
you signed (thank you!). Our second and
harder task was to develop positions on
some of the most important substantive
issues before the conference. The output
of this second phase of our work is a 7
page lobby document that is now
available for endorsement for the next
24 hours at:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:red"><a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://bestbits.net/itu-plenipot-notes"
target="_blank">http://bestbits.net/itu-plenipot-notes</a></span></b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif""><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">The
fluid working group struggled to obtain
the conference proposals on which to
base our analysis and recommendations,
both because of the ITU's restrictions
on document access and because many
Member States submitted their proposals
quite late in the day. As a result, our
drafting process has taken us hard up
against the start of the Plenipot
itself. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">It
is now very urgent to get this text in
front of delegations, so we are opening
it for endorsements rather than comment.
If however someone has a red flag,
"absolutely can't live with it" issue
that prevents them from signing on, they
should email me personally in the next
24 hours to propose an edit(s) to
resolve this issue, and I will consult
the other members of the ITU fluid
working group on whether to accept this
edit. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">Due
to the lack of time for comment and
consensus, we are not presenting these
recommendations in the name of Best Bits
or on behalf of civil society in general
but only on behalf of the specific
organisations endorsing. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">If
you would like your organisation to be
listed, please send your logo to
Carolina Rossini (<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:crossini@publicknowledge.org"
target="_blank">crossini@publicknowledge.org</a>)
by 22:30 CET (16:30 EST) tomorrow, 21
Oct.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">Best
wishes<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">Anne<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal">-- <o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:8.5pt">Anne Jellema </span><span
style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif""><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:8.5pt">CEO </span><span
style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif""><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:8.5pt">+27 061 36
9352 (ZA) </span><span
style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif""><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:8.5pt">+1 202 684
6885 (US)</span><span
style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif""><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:8.5pt">@afjellema </span><span
style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif""><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
style="font-size:8.5pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">World
Wide Web Foundation | 1110 Vermont
Ave NW, Suite 500, Washington DC,
20005, USA | <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.webfoundation.org/"
target="_blank"><span
style="color:#519032;text-decoration:none">www.webfoundation.org</span></a> |
Twitter: @webfoundation</span></b><span
style="font-size:7.5pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif""> </span><span
style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif""><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:7.5pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif""> </span>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:13.5pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<pre>____________________________________________________________<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>You received this message as a subscriber on the list:<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre> <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:bestbits@lists.bestbits.net" target="_blank">bestbits@lists.bestbits.net</a>.<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre> <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits" target="_blank">http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Forum mailing list<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Forum@justnetcoalition.org">Forum@justnetcoalition.org</a><br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://justnetcoalition.org/mailman/listinfo/forum_justnetcoalition.org"
target="_blank">http://justnetcoalition.org/mailman/listinfo/forum_justnetcoalition.org</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
<br clear="all">
<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal">-- <o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:8.5pt">Anne
Jellema </span><span
style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif""><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:8.5pt">CEO </span><span
style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif""><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:8.5pt">+27
061 36 9352 (ZA) </span><span
style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif""><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:8.5pt">+1
202 684 6885 (US)</span><span
style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif""><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:8.5pt">@afjellema </span><span
style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif""><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
style="font-size:8.5pt;font-family:"Lucida
Grande","serif";color:#519032">World
Wide Web Foundation | 1110 Vermont Ave NW, Suite
500, Washington DC, 20005, USA | <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.webfoundation.org/"
target="_blank"><span
style="color:#519032;text-decoration:none">www.webfoundation.org</span></a> |
Twitter: @webfoundation</span></b><span
style="font-size:7.5pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif""> </span><span
style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif""><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:7.5pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif""> </span>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:13.5pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<pre>_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>IRP mailing list<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:IRP@lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org">IRP@lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><a moz-do-not-send="true" href="https://lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org/mailman/listinfo/irp">https://lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org/mailman/listinfo/irp</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>