<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"></head><body >Some if us are working on an alternative formulation. It will be made available for sign on. Better late than never. ...<div>I hope</div><div>Many cso statements during the conference were directly connected to the consensus document formulated on the 21st , and presenters described themselves as speaking for a broad set of cs voices. I don't believe the final statements had that broad support. </div><br><br><br>-------- Original message --------<br>From: Adam Peake <ajp@glocom.ac.jp> <br>Date: 04/30/2014 7:31 AM (GMT-05:00) <br>To: Jeremy Malcolm <Jeremy@Malcolm.id.au> <br>Cc: Andrew Puddephatt <Andrew@gp-digital.org>,"bestbits@lists.bestbits.net> <" <bestbits@lists.bestbits.net> <br>Subject: Re: [bestbits] Civil society response to NETmundial 2014 outcome text open for endorsement <br> <br><br><br><br><br>On Apr 25, 2014, at 7:24 PM, Jeremy Malcolm wrote:<br><br>> I haven't endorsed it either for the same reason.<br>> <br><br><br>Would have been nice to know who Niels was speaking for -- gave the impression of civil society broadly. Who asked for the opportunity to speak and who did they say they represented? <br><br>Adam<br><br><br><br>> -- <br>> Jeremy Malcolm PhD LLB (Hons) B Com<br>> Internet lawyer, ICT policy advocate, geek <br>> host -t NAPTR 5.9.8.5.2.8.2.2.1.0.6.e164.org|awk -F! '{print $3}'<br>> WARNING: This email has not been encrypted. You are strongly recommended to enable encryption at your end. For instructions, see http://jere.my/l/pgp.<br>> <br>> <br>> On 25 Apr 2014, at 7:20 am, Andrew Puddephatt <Andrew@gp-digital.org> wrote:<br>> <br>>> I think this is much too negative and fails to reflect the amount of positive agenda and genuinely good things that came out of the whole process. I can’t support this statement <br>>> <br>>> Andrew Puddephatt<br>>> Global Partners Digital<br>>> Andrew@gp-digital.org<br>>> Tel mobile +44 (0)771 339 9597 <br>>> Tel office +44 (0)207 549 0350<br>>> <br>>> <br>>> From: Jeremy Malcolm <Jeremy@Malcolm.id.au><br>>> Reply-To: Jeremy Malcolm <Jeremy@Malcolm.id.au><br>>> Date: Friday, 25 April 2014 01:44<br>>> To: "<bestbits@lists. net>" <bestbits@lists.bestbits.net><br>>> Subject: [bestbits] Civil society response to NETmundial 2014 outcome text open for endorsement<br>>> <br>>> The following initial response to the NETmundial 2014 outcome text was agreed in the room at NETmundial by about 25 civil society representatives and was read out in the session by Niels ten Oever from Article 19. If you are in agreement, please endorse and share:<br>>> <br>>> http://bestbits.net/netmundial-response<br>>> <br>>> This need not prevent the development of a more substantive civil society response later.<br>>> <br>>> -- <br>>> Jeremy Malcolm PhD LLB (Hons) B Com<br>>> Internet lawyer, ICT policy advocate, geek<br>>> host -t NAPTR 5.9.8.5.2.8.2.2.1.0.6.e164.org|awk -F! '{print $3}'<br>>> <br>>> WARNING: This email has not been encrypted. You are strongly recommended to enable encryption at your end. For instructions, see http://jere.my/l/pgp.<br>>> <br>> ____________________________________________________________<br>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:<br>> bestbits@lists.bestbits.net.<br>> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:<br>> http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits<br><br></body>