<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On Thursday 17 April 2014 04:08 AM, Ian
Peter wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:ABBB33C3166A4A4F93414DEA93F05027@Toshiba"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri'; COLOR:
#000000">
<div style="WORD-WRAP: break-word">Hi everyone,</div>
<div style="WORD-WRAP: break-word"> </div>
<div style="WORD-WRAP: break-word">To me one of the weakest
sections of the document is the paragraph dealing with
surveillance issues (para 35 of the Roadmap) which reads “<span
style="FONT-FAMILY: ; WHITE-SPACE: normal; TEXT-TRANSFORM:
none; WORD-SPACING: 0px; FLOAT: none; COLOR: ; DISPLAY:
inline !important; LETTER-SPACING: normal; LINE-HEIGHT:
25px; TEXT-INDENT: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px"><font
face="Arial"><font color="#ca0000"><span
class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>Internet
surveillance – Mass and arbitrary surveillance
undermines trust in the Internet and trust in the
Internet governance ecosystem. Surveillance of
communications, their interception, and the collection
of personal data, including mass surveillance,
interception and collection should be conducted in
accordance with states’ obligations under
international human rights law. More dialogue is
needed on this topic at the international level using
forums like IGF and the Human Rights Council aiming to
develop a common understanding on all the related
aspects”.</font></font></span></div>
<div style="WORD-WRAP: break-word"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: ;
WHITE-SPACE: normal; TEXT-TRANSFORM: none; WORD-SPACING:
0px; FLOAT: none; COLOR: ; DISPLAY: inline !important;
LETTER-SPACING: normal; LINE-HEIGHT: 25px; TEXT-INDENT:
0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px"></span> </div>
<div style="WORD-WRAP: break-word">This fairly weak language
and action line (more dialogue) is not surprising given the
governmental input (including US Government) into the
drafting. So far the only comment on this is from me, where
I suggest reference to the necessaryandproportionate.org
principles. </div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
You of course know that reference to 'necessary and proportionate'
was there in the original draft and it got removed... What are the
chances then it will be reinstated at your request?<br>
<br>
parminder<br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:ABBB33C3166A4A4F93414DEA93F05027@Toshiba"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri'; COLOR:
#000000">
<div style="WORD-WRAP: break-word"> </div>
<div style="WORD-WRAP: break-word">I think it would be useful
if others commented as individuals. Perhaps what we need is
some better wording (which perhaps governments would be
embarrassed not to include), and which would strengthen the
response here. In any case, some wording and indication of
level of concern to ensure that this is discussed on the
floor of the meeting rather than simply passed by as an
adequate wording would be useful!</div>
<div style="WORD-WRAP: break-word"> </div>
<div style="WORD-WRAP: break-word"> </div>
<div style="WORD-WRAP: break-word">Ian Peter</div>
<div style="WORD-WRAP: break-word"> </div>
<div style="WORD-WRAP: break-word">The site for entering
responses is <a moz-do-not-send="true"
title="http://document.netmundial.br/2-roadmap-for-the-future-evolution-of-the-internet-governance/"
href="http://document.netmundial.br/2-roadmap-for-the-future-evolution-of-the-internet-governance/">http://document.netmundial.br/2-roadmap-for-the-future-evolution-of-the-internet-governance/</a></div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>