<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>DeNardis's response to this (she addresses this very question in the talk you can find at the video link below) is to say that there is a public-policy dimension to every level of these functions.</div><div><br></div><div>--Mike</div><div><br></div><div><br><br>Sent from my iPad</div><div><br>On Apr 15, 2014, at 11:46, "parminder" <<a href="mailto:parminder@itforchange.net">parminder@itforchange.net</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<br>
<font face="Verdana">The focus here is of one clear set of functions
- public policy making, that also, specifically decision making
vis a vis public polices... <br>
<br>
If we need closures somewhere. Power does not disappear in absence
of legitimate governance. The Internet is right now being shaped
by the powerful for their benefit. <br>
<br>
At one point we need to agree on should be taking decisions for
public policies. <br>
<br>
And to reach that point faster than slower is more in the interest
to those most excluded in current power configurations..<br>
<br>
parminder <br>
<br>
</font>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On Tuesday 15 April 2014 08:51 PM, Mike
Godwin (<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:mgodwin@INTERNEWS.ORG">mgodwin@INTERNEWS.ORG</a>) wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:CF72C3B9.7621%25mgodwin@internews.org" type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div>
<div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>Following a suggestion made by Carolina Rossini at a New
America Foundation panel she moderated, I mined Laura DeNardis’s
and Mark Raymond’s paper (“Thinking Clearly about
Multistakeholder Governance”) for its big chart of
“disaggregated internet governance” functions.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I find it’s useful to look at this chart (somewhat clumsily
assembled by me and attached here as a PDF) and ask which of
these functions are best administered by multi-stakeholder
process, which are best administered by expert bodies (including
self-selected experts), which are best administered by
governments or intergovernmental entities, and so forth.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Here’s a link to DeNardis’s talk about her new
internet-governance book:</div>
<div>The Global War for Internet Governance with Dr. Laura
DeNardis: </div>
<div><a defanghtml_moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://youtu.be/i_bZw-O7cC0">http://youtu.be/i_bZw-O7cC0</a></div>
<div> via @YouTube</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Unsurprisingly, DeNardis says there’s no one-size-fits-all
solution for administering every aspect of internet governance. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>—Mike</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br><br>
<font style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff">
<p align="center"><font style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff">Click <a href="https://www.mailcontrol.com/sr/SLTIX!1pGLjGX2PQPOmvUvmldA89nuwlSoAX7r!jIRxcoXo6nn2mhn!ohfKSaq7Y1ZHL82yINvFPpv0P1Tfw+Q==">here</a> to report this email as spam.</font></p></font>
</div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><message-footer.txt></div></blockquote></body></html>