<div dir="ltr">I just found out the original message was directed to my spam folder, and maybe I'm not the only one to whom that has happened.<div>Congrats and thanks to those who were on the call and those who drafted this.<br>
<div><br></div><div>+1 to Louis and Jeanette, and adding to the former's point:</div><div><br></div><div>Since there already is "interoperable" among the list of adjectives, maybe editing it to "globally interoperable" will do? Except that I am not sure what "interconnected... Internet" would mean since it seems to me that "interconnected" is already part of the notion/definition of the Internet. I am saying this because someone could be tempted to say: Then we should add "globally" to both "interconnected" and "interoperable." </div>
<div><br></div><div>In sum, unless there is something specific meant by "interconnected Internet" that is not already implied in the notion of Internet or in the rest of the adjectives, I'd suggest that phrase to read:</div>
<div><br></div><div>"... <span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">to preserve a globally interoperable, secure, stable, resilient, sustainable, and trustworthy Internet."</span></div><div><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><br>
</span></div><div><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">Mawaki</span></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><div><div dir="ltr"><span style="border-collapse:separate;border-spacing:0px"><div><span style="border-collapse:separate;border-spacing:0px"><span style="border-collapse:separate;border-spacing:0px"><span style="border-collapse:collapse"><div>
<div><span style="border-collapse:separate;border-spacing:0px"><span style="border-collapse:separate;border-spacing:0px"><span style="border-collapse:collapse"><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(80,0,80)">
=====================================</div>Mawaki Chango, PhD</span></span></span></div><div><span style="border-collapse:separate;border-spacing:0px"><span style="border-collapse:separate;border-spacing:0px"><span style="border-collapse:collapse">Founder and Owner</span></span></span></div>
<div><span style="border-collapse:separate;border-spacing:0px"><span style="border-collapse:separate;border-spacing:0px"><span style="border-collapse:collapse">DIGILEXIS Consulting</span></span></span></div><div><br><span style="border-collapse:separate;border-spacing:0px"><span style="border-collapse:separate;border-spacing:0px"><span style="border-collapse:collapse"><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(34,34,34)">
<a href="mailto:m.chango@digilexis.com" style="color:rgb(17,85,204)" target="_blank">m.chango@digilexis.com</a> | <a href="http://www.digilexis.com/" style="color:rgb(17,85,204)" target="_blank">http://www.digilexis.com</a> <br>
Twitter: @digilexis | @dig_mawaki | Skype: digilexis</div></span></span></span></div><div style="color:rgb(80,0,80)">======================================</div></div><div><br></div></span></span></span></div></span></div>
</div>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Jeanette Hofmann <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jeanette@wzb.eu" target="_blank">jeanette@wzb.eu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
<br>
Am 11.04.14 11:59, schrieb Louis Pouzin (well):<div class=""><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Congrats for this steep challenge.<br>
Here a few comments.<br>
<br>
Surveillance<br>
<br>
“arbitrary or unlawful collection of personal data and surveillance” by<br>
States ..<br>
<br>
States can declare lawful whatever they do. Isn't there a recent UN<br>
declaration (dec 2013 ?) that could provide some language here.<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
For your convience:<br>
<br>
1. Reaffirms the right to privacy, according to which no one shall be subjected to arbitrary or unlawful interference with his or her privacy, family, home or correspondence, and the right to the protection of the law against such interference, as set out in article 12 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and article 17 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights;<br>
2. Recognizes the global and open nature of the Internet and the rapid advancement in information and communications technologies as a driving force in accelerating progress towards development in its various forms;<br>
3. Affirms that the same rights that people have offline must also be protected online, including the right to privacy;<br>
<br>
This is very strong language, agreed upon by the General Assembly. Why should civil society be satisfied with less?<br>
<br>
What really matters: he right to the protection of the law against such interference,<br>
<br>
This goes beyond an individual right to privacy, it includes a right to be protected of the law and thus may imply a right to the protection of privacy.<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="">
<br>
Internet Infrastructure<br>
<br>
Internet is a network of networks and applications using a diversity of<br></div>
infrastructures, not a singular entity. In this context /"unfragmented"/<div class=""><br>
is an undefined term without any precise meaning. Suggestion:<br></div>
/interoperable/.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
I support that too. The "threat of fragmentation" seems to have assumed a political/ideological meaning over the last year or so.<br>
<br>
jeanette<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="">
- - -<br>
<br>
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Andrew Puddephatt<br></div><div class="">
<<a href="mailto:Andrew@gp-digital.org" target="_blank">Andrew@gp-digital.org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:Andrew@gp-digital.org" target="_blank">Andrew@gp-digital.org</a>><u></u>> wrote:<br>
<br>
Great work everyone – thanks for putting this together so speedily<br>
<br>
Andrew Puddephatt<br>
Global Partners Digital<br></div>
<a href="mailto:Andrew@gp-digital.org" target="_blank">Andrew@gp-digital.org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:Andrew@gp-digital.org" target="_blank">Andrew@gp-digital.org</a>><br>
Tel mobile <a href="tel:%2B44%20%280%29771%20339%209597" value="+447713399597" target="_blank">+44 (0)771 339 9597</a> <tel:%2B44%20%280%29771%20339%<u></u>209597><br>
Tel office <a href="tel:%2B44%20%280%29207%20549%200350" value="+442075490350" target="_blank">+44 (0)207 549 0350</a> <tel:%2B44%20%280%29207%20549%<u></u>200350><br>
<br>
<br>
From: Jeremy Malcolm <<a href="mailto:Jeremy@Malcolm.id.au" target="_blank">Jeremy@Malcolm.id.au</a><br>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:Jeremy@Malcolm.id.au" target="_blank">Jeremy@Malcolm.id.au</a>>><br>
Reply-To: Jeremy Malcolm <<a href="mailto:Jeremy@Malcolm.id.au" target="_blank">Jeremy@Malcolm.id.au</a><br>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:Jeremy@Malcolm.id.au" target="_blank">Jeremy@Malcolm.id.au</a>>><div class=""><br>
Date: Friday, 11 April 2014 05:09<br>
To: "<bestbits@lists. net>" <<a href="mailto:bestbits@lists.bestbits.net" target="_blank">bestbits@lists.bestbits.net</a><br></div>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:bestbits@lists.bestbits.net" target="_blank">bestbits@lists.<u></u>bestbits.net</a>>><div class=""><br>
Subject: [bestbits] URGENT - statement commenting on draft<br>
NETmundial text to be posted 8.5 hours from now<br>
<br>
Yesterday the Best Bits participants who are helping to organise the<br>
NETmundial civil society pre-meeting on 22 April held a call about<br>
the meeting (more on this later), and also, thought not on the<br>
agenda, there was consensus that it would be strategically important<br>
to post a short statement about the NETmundial text that was leaked<br>
by Wikileaks on Wednesday<br>
(<a href="https://wikileaks.org/netmundial-outcome/NETmundial-EMC-Outcome-Document.pdf" target="_blank">https://wikileaks.org/<u></u>netmundial-outcome/NETmundial-<u></u>EMC-Outcome-Document.pdf</a><br></div>
<<a href="https://wikileaks.org/netmundial-outcome/NETmundial-EMC-Outcome-Document.pdf%29" target="_blank">https://wikileaks.org/<u></u>netmundial-outcome/NETmundial-<u></u>EMC-Outcome-Document.pdf%29</a>>)<div class="">
<br>
in order to influence the drafting process that is current underway.<br>
<br>
The statement is generally supportive of the draft but highlights<br>
the parts that we consider most important to preserve, particularly<br>
considering the points endorsed in previous BestBits submissions.<br>
<br></div>
Unfortunately, *the statement has to be released by 8.5 hours from<br>
now* because that is the next meeting of the Executive<div class=""><br>
Multistakeholder Committee (EMC) at which the draft will be<br>
considered again. So with our apologies for the very short notice<br>
and limited opportunity to participate by those who were not on the<br>
call, here is a sign-on statement that was composed over the last<br>
few hours (into the late night for some):<br>
<br>
<a href="http://bestbits.net/netmundial-outcome-comments/" target="_blank">http://bestbits.net/<u></u>netmundial-outcome-comments/</a><br>
<br>
I am also pasting it below. If you would like to endorse it, please<br>
make sure that if you do so before 10:30am Brazil time, which is<br>
less than 8.5 hours from now. As usual, you can endorse it from the<br>
website above, not by replying to this email. The statement will<br>
also be emailed to the Executive Multistakeholder Committee members<br>
to ensure that they receive it before their meeting.<br>
<br>
[snip]<br>
</div></blockquote>
<br>____________________________________________________________<br>
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:<br>
<a href="mailto:bestbits@lists.bestbits.net">bestbits@lists.bestbits.net</a>.<br>
To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:<br>
<a href="http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits" target="_blank">http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits</a><br></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div>