<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On Tuesday 07 January 2014 10:26 PM,
Carolina Rossini wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAK-FJAfkf9XBU4c1spvDAui9iS62Z+cCagBGgeF7BJz4yFg89A@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">Dear folks,<br>
<br>
Adiel will be the person in the meeting in Brazil on January
10th. Folks in Brazil want this "1Net" fictional entity to
filter ALL conversations with CGI. </div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Carolina<br>
<br>
Your description of 1Net and its role as seen by LOG is interesting.
The point is; does civil society agree to this arrangement - of 1Net
filtering all conversations with CGI... or have we simply become a
pushover (willing?) for the powerful to make deals among themselves.
That would be such a shame, and I have begun to get this feeling
that we are fast getting there if not already there.<br>
<br>
<i><b>Do we want to write to LOG/ CGI that this arrangement is not
acceptable to us? I request that list members give their
response to this. </b></i><br>
<br>
That reminds me: at Bali, this issue was much discussed and four
prominent civil society groups (IGC, BB, APC and IRP) together
agreed that, no this arrangement is not acceptable to us (Please let
me know if this is *not* what people thing got agreed) and decided
to send a letter to Brazilians to the effect, and also putting
forward 4 CS Liaisons, who were requested to be invited to all
meetings related to organising the Brazil meeting. (Quite
inexplicably though the drafting and sending of the letter got
highly delayed even after this decision.)<br>
<br>
Caroline, you, and Joana and Laura were 3 liaisons . Why did you not
keep us posted about what was happening in Brazil... Did you insist
that you be invited to all meetings? If so, what was their response?
Why did you not share their response with all of us? Why when, while
such is in any case the duty of any CS rep, the letter clearly said
that the Liaisons will keep CS groups posted about developments.
However, whereas much has happened since that time, I dont remember
a single report by the liaisons to us. Carlos used to report but
then he had to drop out since he was made a member of LOG. But what
about the three of you?<br>
<br>
When after the last LOG meeting, we got the bombshell that it has
been officially decided that 1Net will as you say 'filter ALL
conversations with CGI' I wrote repeatedly to this list requesting
CS Liaisons to bring us to speed about what is happening. In fact,
even Ian (and I think Jeremy) asked for some information about what
was happening. But NONE of you responded to any of our requests....<br>
<br>
I think. sorry for my words, but this is about a public duty, and
seeking accountability about it, this is a clear abdication of the
role that you all were given as CS reps... I am sure there must be
an explanation of this somewhere, in which case please do share it.
<br>
<br>
Thanks, parminder <br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAK-FJAfkf9XBU4c1spvDAui9iS62Z+cCagBGgeF7BJz4yFg89A@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">So, it is better to write to Adiel, not just to
CGI. Here is Adiel email if you prefer to do so: Adiel Akplogan
<<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:adiel@afrinic.net">adiel@afrinic.net</a>><br
clear="all">
<div><br>
-- <br>
<div>
<div
style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.6667px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)"><b>Carol
(in my personal capacity) <br>
</b></div>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>