<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<big><font face="Calibri"><br>
Dear Hartmut,<br>
<br>
Thanks for the clarification.<br>
<br>
I request a further clarification. What is this 1Net that you
are having this privileged discussion about organising the
Brazil meeting with? I am on the 1Net's own list where I am told
that 1Net is yet nothing other than what the yet to be
constituted steering committee of the 1Net will decide it to be.<br>
<br>
However, LOG seems to have a very clear and strong view of the
1Net, to plan an exclusive discussion with it, quoting your
email below " to sort out relevant details related to the
Brazil Meeting process, in particular the organization of the
meeting's committees". (At least tell us, who is that you
discuss things with when you say you discuss something with
1Net?)<br>
<br>
I understand that the enclosed letter signed by key civil
society organisations was handed over to LOG long back, where
civil society groups say very clearly that they will like to
directly deal with LOG (and, although the letter was polite
enough not to use the name, the contextual </font></big><big><font
face="Calibri">meaning </font></big><big><font face="Calibri">clearly
was, "not be dealt with through the 1Net"). It also put forward
its interim Liaisons, with a specific request that they be
invited to every meeting in relation to organising the Brazil
meeting.<br>
<br>
In the circumstances, I request clarification why this request
of major civil society networks was entirely ignored, and the
yet (supposedly) unclear and undefined 1Net is being given this
extremely privileged position. We have no problem with whoever
else LOG deals with, but if civil society groups asked to be
dealt with directly, and in a certain well-described way, it
would have been best if that request was acceded to. The least
that is required is to be informed why is it not being acceded
to.<br>
<br>
Thanks, and wishing you the best in the very important and
intense work that you and LOG are involved with.<br>
<br>
parminder <br>
<br>
</font></big><br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On Tuesday 07 January 2014 09:41 PM,
Hartmut Richard Glaser wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:52CC274D.9080002@cgi.br" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<br>
<u><big><b>URGENT INFORMATION</b></big></u><u><b><big>/CLARIFICATION</big></b></u><br>
<pre wrap=""><big><font face="Calibri">
Dear All,
There will be a face-to-face meeting in Brazil on Friday, January 10th, between the
local organizing group (LOG) and representatives of 1Net to sort out relevant details
related to the Brazil Meeting process, in particular the organization of the meeting's
committees.
<u>This is not a meeting of any of the committees planned for the event's</u><u> </u><u>process,</u> since
they are not yet constituted. We hope that by January 15th the nominations from all
stakeholders will be in place for all committees to start their work.
Thanks for your support.
<font face="AppleGothic">Local Organizing Group/CGI.br</font>
BR Meeting - Global Multistakeholder Meeting
on the Future of Internet Governance</font></big></pre>
<br>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:discuss@1net.org">discuss@1net.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss">http://1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>