<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>I am happy to play one of the roles, since I do believe we need consistency and coherency.</div><div>Let me know where I could fit best. </div><div>Carolina<br><br>Sent from my iPad</div><div><br>On Dec 5, 2013, at 3:19 PM, matthew shears <<a href="mailto:mshears@cdt.org">mshears@cdt.org</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
My understanding from some time back was that we had the following:<br>
<br>
4 (now 3) persons directly liaising with Brazil on the meeting (<u>not</u>
through 1net)<br>
<br>
And to fill<br>
<br>
5 civil society slots on the 1net steering committee (recognizing
that civil society liaison for the Brazil meeting is as above). <br>
<br>
And <br>
<br>
Some number of civil society slots to be filled on some combination
of the actual Brazil meeting committees (to be determined although
there are suggestions that there should be 2 from civil society for
at least two of the committees).<br>
<br>
From my perspective, and to echo a point made by Joana earlier, it
would seem to make sense that those liaising with Brazil at the
moment should probably be a part of the meeting committees to ensure
consistency and coherency.<br>
<br>
As to 1net, it might also make sense for one of the Brazil liaisons
to be a part of the 1net civil society steering committee component
just to be sure that we have continuity across the various
committees/liaisons.<br>
<br>
Finally, I realize that there is quite some debate about what 1net
is or is not but I do believe that there is merit to participating
and seeing where it leads us - as we have discussed before. I would
also note that there is considerable merit in bringing stakeholders
together and to figuring out what pressing IG related issues those
stakeholders can find commonality of purpose on and work together to
progress. <br>
<br>
Matthew<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 05/12/2013 13:22, Anja Kovacs wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:CAJqNAHAeShakniimBRnbBwofo6rQcSi8PzN-NpapGJ_tT-gJ5Q@mail.gmail.com" type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">On 5 December 2013 17:32, parminder <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:parminder@itforchange.net" target="_blank">parminder@itforchange.net</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="im"> <br>
<div>On Thursday 05 December 2013 04:35 PM, Anja
Kovacs wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div>I agree that Rafik would be a good choice.<br>
<br>
What I'm not so clear about is why the four
Brazilian liaisons should also continue to be
de facto representatives in the 1net Steering
Committee,</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
Anja<br>
<br>
I might have missed it, but I dont remember seeing any
proposal to have our 4 Brazilian liaisons to Brazil
meeting organising structure also be CS reps on the
Steering Committee. <br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>That seemed to be what Jeremy proposed in his initial
email, hence my response, but I also don't recall there
being a broader discussion or agreement on this. <br>
<br>
</div>
<div>Best,<br>
Anja<br>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"> </font></span>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>____________________________________________________________</span><br><span>You received this message as a subscriber on the list:</span><br><span> <a href="mailto:bestbits@lists.bestbits.net">bestbits@lists.bestbits.net</a>.</span><br><span>To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:</span><br><span> <a href="http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits">http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits</a></span></div></blockquote></body></html>