<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 14px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><div>I vaguely remember him using this at APrIGF Seoul as well. </div><div><br></div><div>Interesting!</div><div><br></div><div>Best wishes and regards</div><div>Shahzad</div><div><br></div><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><div style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11pt; text-align:left; color:black; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; PADDING-LEFT: 0in; PADDING-RIGHT: 0in; BORDER-TOP: #b5c4df 1pt solid; BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-TOP: 3pt"><span style="font-weight:bold">From: </span> Adam Peake <<a href="mailto:ajp@glocom.ac.jp">ajp@glocom.ac.jp</a>><br><span style="font-weight:bold">Date: </span> Saturday, November 30, 2013 at 8:57 PM<br><span style="font-weight:bold">To: </span> Jeremy Malcolm <<a href="mailto:jeremy@ciroap.org">jeremy@ciroap.org</a>><br><span style="font-weight:bold">Cc: </span> McTim <<a href="mailto:mctimconsulting@gmail.com">mctimconsulting@gmail.com</a>>, Anja Kovacs <<a href="mailto:anja@internetdemocracy.in">anja@internetdemocracy.in</a>>, "<,<a href="mailto:bestbits@lists.bestbits.net>">bestbits@lists.bestbits.net></a>," <<a href="mailto:bestbits@lists.bestbits.net">bestbits@lists.bestbits.net</a>><br><span style="font-weight:bold">Subject: </span> Re: Multi-Equal Stakeholderism (was Re: [bestbits] Joint civil society endorsements for London meeting of High-Level Panel)<br></div><div><br></div><div><div><div>concept of "multi-equal-stakeholder" was introduced by Fadi Chehadé soon after he joined ICANN last year. Might have been used before, but something he's spoken of often. It will be in meeting transcripts from around Oct 2012, or see, example, </div><div><br></div><div><a href="http://www.internetgovernance.org/2012/10/15/icanns-new-ceo-talks-about-balance-of-power/">http://www.internetgovernance.org/2012/10/15/icanns-new-ceo-talks-about-balance-of-power/</a></div><div><br></div><div><a href="http://www.dotgreen.org/blogs-updates/new-season/">http://www.dotgreen.org/blogs-updates/new-season/</a></div><div><br></div><div>Adam</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>On Dec 1, 2013, at 12:45 AM, Jeremy Malcolm wrote:</div><div><br></div><blockquote id="MAC_OUTLOOK_ATTRIBUTION_BLOCKQUOTE" style="BORDER-LEFT: #b5c4df 5 solid; PADDING:0 0 0 5; MARGIN:0 0 0 5;"><div> On 30 Nov 2013, at 9:31 pm, McTim <<a href="mailto:mctimconsulting@gmail.com">mctimconsulting@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><div> </div><blockquote id="MAC_OUTLOOK_ATTRIBUTION_BLOCKQUOTE" style="BORDER-LEFT: #b5c4df 5 solid; PADDING:0 0 0 5; MARGIN:0 0 0 5;"><div> Also, if someone could guide me to a space where I can find out more about "multi-equal-stakeholderism" and its origins, I'd be grateful - first time I hear about this.</div><div> </div><div> This is a very good question. I don't know much about non-Internet-y multi-equal-ness, but I think the purest form of multi-equal stakeholderism in IG can be found in some of the RIR PDPs and the IETF processes.</div></blockquote><div> </div><div> It's an odd choice of example, since many would say the IETF is not multi-stakeholder all, since it does not recognise stakeholder groups. Where multi-equal stakeholderism is usually used specifically in reference to organisations that do recognise stakeholder groups, to indicate that they should be equal to one another in process terms. This distinguishes it from forms of multi-stakeholderism like at the OECD and purportedly at the ITU, that don't recognise equality between the stakeholders. So it's an attempt to refine the term multi-stakeholderism. I have to say, I don't really like the term though.</div><div> </div><div> -- </div><div> Dr Jeremy Malcolm</div><div> Senior Policy Officer</div><div> Consumers International | the global campaigning voice for consumers</div><div> Office for Asia-Pacific and the Middle East</div><div> Lot 5-1 Wisma WIM, 7 Jalan Abang Haji Openg, TTDI, 60000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia</div><div> Tel: +60 3 7726 1599</div><div> </div><div> </div><div> Explore our new Resource Zone - the global consumer movement knowledge hub |<a href="http://www.consumersinternational.org/news-and-media/resource-zone">http://www.consumersinternational.org/news-and-media/resource-zone</a></div><div> </div><div> </div><div> @Consumers_Int | www.consumersinternational.org | www.facebook.com/consumersinternational</div><div> </div><div> Read our email confidentiality notice. Don't print this email unless necessary.</div><div> </div><div> WARNING: This email has not been encrypted. You are strongly recommended to enable PGP or S/MIME encryption at your end. For instructions, see <a href="http://jere.my/l/8m">http://jere.my/l/8m</a>.</div><div> </div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>____________________________________________________________</div><div>You received this message as a subscriber on the list:</div><div> <a href="mailto:bestbits@lists.bestbits.net">bestbits@lists.bestbits.net</a>.</div><div>To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:</div><div> <a href="http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits">http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits</a></div></div></div></span></body></html>