<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<font face="Verdana">I will like to participate in all.... <br>
<br>
Meanwhile, I had requested on the 'summit' sublist of BB that the
term 'orphan issues' is loaded and that the more appropriate term
from Tunis agenda 'Internet-related public policy issues' be used
under 3.2 below. I think Jeremy did change it then as per my
suggestion.<br>
<br>
The term 'orphan issues' was essentially introduced recently by
the I* star group. To me it gives 'public policy issues' a status
of kind of subsidiarity or dependency (in any case, certainly a
lower status) to 'IG issues of technical nature' that I* deals
with - whereby it becomes more 'logical' to extend the ICANN model
of governance to substantive public policy issues.... <br>
<br>
parminder<br>
<br>
</font>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On Saturday 23 November 2013 02:03 AM,
Marilia Maciel wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CACpVkK1zAF_hHq5ZMQs5C2EL4D6WJuqW82OS6ZhnpWVNNbmEyg@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;background:white">OUTPUTS</span><span
style="font-size:12.0pt"></span></p>
<ol start="1" type="1">
<li class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">Recommendation
on process issues for the conference (remote participation,
stakeholder representation and selection)</span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">Substantive
input on universal Internet principles (based on Marco Civil
and/or other existing principles documents).</span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">Substantive
input on an institutional framework for multistakeholder
Internet governance including:</span></li>
<ol start="1" type="1">
<li class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">Internationalisation
of ICANN (based on existing work done by Internet
Governance Project and/or others).</span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">Orphan
issues (based on existing proposals put before the WGEC
and the recommendations of the Correspondence Group).</span></li>
</ol>
</ol>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>