<div dir="ltr">Hi all, <div><br></div><div>I support the idea of outlining a civil society agenda. Perhaps that agenda could be formatted in such a way that it could be repurposed for other processes, so as not to single out what Parminder aptly describes as an "unborn" initiative.</div>
<div><br>It would be good to use the Best Bits session as an opportunity to develop this agenda, but to continue the discussion online as well, so as not exclude those who are not able to come to Bali. </div><div><br></div>
<div>In terms of timing, if I understand correctly, the proposed date for the Brazilian summit is sometime in April 2014. This seems like a good opportunity to note that Access is hosting RightsCon (<a href="http://www.rightscon.org/">http://www.rightscon.org/</a>) in San Francisco from 3-5 March. We have opened up the programming so that anyone can submit a session. Given the timeframe, this could be a good opportunity to broaden support for a civil society agenda and for CS present to strategize in the lead up to the summit.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Best, <br>Deborah </div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Anriette Esterhuysen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:anriette@apc.org" target="_blank">anriette@apc.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
I cannot agree more.<br>
<br>
Not only do I share Rafik's skepticism, I also think we should not
fall into the trap of thinking of ICANN (and the ICANN DNS gold
rush) as being at the core of the policy-making processes that
matter to how people access, use, and develop the internet. <br>
<br>
That ICANN is now setting broader agendas, along with governments,
reflects entirely what is problematic with how power and influence
plays out in IG and I find it alarming.<br>
<br>
Definitely agree with Anja and others who say that CS should get
involved in this debate. A critical perspective is needed now more
than ever. <br>
<br>
Anriette<div><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
<br>
<div>On 10/10/2013 16:34, Rafik Dammak
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">Hi ,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I insist about caution even if it is not popular :) I
understand that some see a window of opportunity and
possibility for CS to outline an agenda and influence a
summit (which remains to be defined). </div>
<div>I want CS to be more proactive and set the tone and I
found strange that we are issuing statement to support
other statements or speeches, I would prefer that we support
more concrete actions and real commitments instead than
just plain speeches.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>and in particular for Fadi, I would like to ask him to
apply what he is preaching about multistakeholderism and
respect process and stakeholders within ICANN .</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra">
Best Regards,</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">Rafik </div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">2013/10/10 matthew shears <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mshears@cdt.org" target="_blank">mshears@cdt.org</a>></span><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"> I agree that we
need to approach this with some caution. That said, we
should start working on a CS agenda for this summit -
its good for CS to communicate its expectations of such
events early and we should start this process in Bali.
Less convinced about the need (or desirability) of
writing letters of appreciation to all and sundry - we
can always note our appreciation in the agenda we work
up.
<div>
<div><br>
<br>
<div>On 10/10/2013 06:47, Anja Kovacs wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<p>I share Rafik's caution to some extent, but it
is difficult not to be enthused by this
proposal. As Mike points out, it is a tremendous
opportunity for all of us to engage in this
debate. Why don't we start working on another
letter to Rousseff, in which we support the idea
but also start outlining a CS agenda for the
summit? What would we like to see such a summit
achieving? Maybe we can use our discussions in
Bali as a basis from which to start drafting
such an agenda.</p>
<p>And maybe time for a word of appreciation to
Chehade as well, at least from those of us who
believe that the internationalisation of ICANN
would be a good thing :)</p>
<p>What do others think?</p>
<p>Best,<br>
Anja</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Oct 10, 2013 7:57 AM,
"Jeremy Malcolm" <<a href="mailto:jeremy@ciroap.org" target="_blank">jeremy@ciroap.org</a>>
wrote:<br type="attribution">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div>On 10/10/13 06:33, John Curran wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre>On Oct 9, 2013, at 3:02 PM, Avri Doria <a href="mailto:avri@acm.org" target="_blank"><avri@acm.org></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre>Do I understand correctly: according to this the President of ICANN has just agreed with the need for external oversight of ICANN, and unnamed other organizations, involved in governance/management of the Internet, just as long as it is multistakeholder?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre>It appears to be a significant effort to address Internet Governance
challenges, including acceleration of the globalization of ICANN towards
an environment in which all stakeholders (including all governments) can
participate on an equal footing...
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
It puts civil society to shame in how timid
we, at large, have been in proposing similar
advances on the status quo. (I have not
made much of a secret of the fact that I was
disappointed in the number of endorsements
that the Best Bits statement on enhanced
cooperation (<a href="http://bestbits.net/ec" target="_blank">http://bestbits.net/ec</a>)
received, though in part I accept that this
was because the statement was simply too
long.)<br>
<br>
This has also, in one stroke, determined the
IGF's future. Of course the writing has
been on the wall for the IGF for a while
now, but it has now officially become
irrelevant in terms of its larger role in
multi-stakeholder Internet governance as
originally anticipated in the Tunis Agenda.
Of course it will continue to have a role as
a discussion forum, but the momentum for it
to fulfil a larger role has moved
elsewhere.<br>
<br>
It also neutralises the effect of the old
guard of the technical community (ISOC
mainly) at the Working Group on Enhanced
Cooperation. Whilst they can still oppose
meaningful implementation of enhanced
cooperation reforms, this opposition is now
utterly token and ineffectual. With Brazil
(and ICANN!) having lost patience and
forging ahead regardless, this leaves anyone
arguing against reforms at the WGEC looking
silly and irrelevant. <br>
<br>
<div>-- <br>
<p style="font-size:9pt"><b>Dr Jeremy
Malcolm<br>
Senior Policy Officer<br>
Consumers International | the global
campaigning voice for consumers</b><br>
Office for Asia-Pacific and the Middle
East<br>
Lot 5-1 Wisma WIM, 7 Jalan Abang Haji
Openg, TTDI, 60000 Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia<br>
Tel: <a href="tel:%2B60%203%207726%201599" value="+60377261599" target="_blank">+60
3 7726 1599</a></p>
<p style="font-size:9pt">Explore our new
Resource Zone - the global consumer
movement knowledge hub | <a href="http://www.consumersinternational.org/news-and-media/resource-zone" target="_blank">http://www.consumersinternational.org/news-and-media/resource-zone</a></p>
<p style="font-size:9pt">@Consumers_Int |
<a href="http://www.consumersinternational.org" target="_blank">www.consumersinternational.org</a>
| <a href="http://www.facebook.com/consumersinternational" target="_blank">www.facebook.com/consumersinternational</a></p>
<p style="font-size:8pt;color:rgb(153,153,153)">Read
our <a href="http://www.consumersinternational.org/email-confidentiality" target="_blank">email confidentiality
notice</a>. Don't print this email
unless necessary.</p>
<p><strong><span style="color:red">WARNING</span></strong><span>:
This email has not been encrypted. You
are strongly recommended to enable PGP
or S/MIME encryption at your end. For
instructions, see <a href="http://jere.my/l/8m" target="_blank">http://jere.my/l/8m</a>.</span></p>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div>
</div>
<span><font color="#888888">
<pre cols="72">--
Matthew Shears
Director and Representative
Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)
<a href="mailto:mshears@cdt.org" target="_blank">mshears@cdt.org</a>
<a href="tel:%2B44%20%280%29%20771%20247%202987" value="+447712472987" target="_blank">+44 (0) 771 247 2987</a>
Skype: mshears
</pre>
</font></span></div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div></div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><pre cols="72">--
------------------------------------------------------
anriette esterhuysen <a href="mailto:anriette@apc.org" target="_blank">anriette@apc.org</a>
executive director, association for progressive communications
<a href="http://www.apc.org" target="_blank">www.apc.org</a>
po box 29755, melville 2109
south africa
tel/fax <a href="tel:%2B27%2011%20726%201692" value="+27117261692" target="_blank">+27 11 726 1692</a></pre>
</font></span></div>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr"><div style="color:rgb(136,136,136);font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)"><font face="garamond, serif">Deborah Brown</font></div><div style="color:rgb(136,136,136);font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)">
<font face="garamond, serif">Senior Policy Analyst</font></div><div style="color:rgb(136,136,136);font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)"><font face="garamond, serif">Access | <a href="http://accessnow.org" target="_blank">accessnow.org</a></font></div>
<div style="color:rgb(136,136,136);font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)"><font face="garamond, serif"><a href="http://rightscon.org" target="_blank">rightscon.org</a></font></div><div style="color:rgb(136,136,136);font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)">
<font face="garamond, serif"><br></font></div><div style="color:rgb(136,136,136);font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)"><font face="garamond, serif">@deblebrown</font></div><div style="color:rgb(136,136,136);font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)">
<font face="garamond, serif">PGP 0x5EB4727D</font></div></div>
</div>