<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    I cannot agree more.<br>
    <br>
    Not only do I share Rafik's skepticism, I also think we should not
    fall into the trap of thinking of ICANN (and the ICANN DNS gold
    rush) as being at the core of the policy-making processes that
    matter to how people access, use, and develop the internet. <br>
    <br>
    That ICANN is now setting broader agendas, along with governments,
    reflects entirely what is problematic with how power and influence
    plays out in IG and I find it alarming.<br>
    <br>
    Definitely agree with Anja and others who say that CS should get
    involved in this debate. A critical perspective is needed now more
    than ever. <br>
    <br>
    Anriette<br>
    <br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/10/2013 16:34, Rafik Dammak
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CAH5sThmBAHm1x47QRni3q5harC+L2W4asdu2t5U==aeyfuT4uw@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div class="gmail_extra">Hi ,
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div>I insist about caution even if it is not popular :) I
            understand that some see a window of opportunity and
            possibility for CS to outline an agenda and influence a
            summit (which remains to be defined). </div>
          <div>I want CS to be more proactive and set the tone and I
             found strange that  we are issuing statement to support
            other statements or speeches, I would prefer that we support
            more concrete actions and real commitments  instead than
            just plain speeches.</div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div>and in particular for Fadi, I would like to ask him to
            apply what he is preaching about multistakeholderism and
            respect process and stakeholders within ICANN .</div>
          <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
          </div>
          <div class="gmail_extra">
            Best Regards,</div>
          <div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all">
            <div>
              <div dir="ltr">Rafik </div>
            </div>
          </div>
          <br>
          <br>
          <div class="gmail_quote">2013/10/10 matthew shears <span
              dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:mshears@cdt.org" target="_blank">mshears@cdt.org</a>></span><br>
            <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
              <div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"> I agree that we
                need to approach this with some caution.  That said, we
                should start working on a CS agenda for this summit -
                its good for CS to communicate its expectations of such
                events early and we should start this process in Bali. 
                Less convinced about the need (or desirability) of
                writing letters of appreciation to all and sundry - we
                can always note our appreciation in the agenda we work
                up.
                <div>
                  <div class="h5"><br>
                     <br>
                    <div>On 10/10/2013 06:47, Anja Kovacs wrote:<br>
                    </div>
                    <blockquote type="cite">
                      <p>I share Rafik's caution to some extent, but it
                        is difficult not to be enthused by this
                        proposal. As Mike points out, it is a tremendous
                        opportunity for all of us to engage in this
                        debate. Why don't we start working on another
                        letter to Rousseff, in which we support the idea
                        but also start outlining a CS agenda for the
                        summit? What would we like to see such a summit
                        achieving? Maybe we can use our discussions in
                        Bali as a basis from which to start drafting
                        such an agenda.</p>
                      <p>And maybe time for a word of appreciation to
                        Chehade as well, at least from those of us who
                        believe that the internationalisation of ICANN
                        would be a good thing :)</p>
                      <p>What do others think?</p>
                      <p>Best,<br>
                        Anja</p>
                      <div class="gmail_quote">On Oct 10, 2013 7:57 AM,
                        "Jeremy Malcolm" <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                          href="mailto:jeremy@ciroap.org"
                          target="_blank">jeremy@ciroap.org</a>>
                        wrote:<br type="attribution">
                        <blockquote class="gmail_quote"
                          style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
                          <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
                            <div>On 10/10/13 06:33, John Curran wrote:<br>
                            </div>
                            <blockquote type="cite">
                              <pre>On Oct 9, 2013, at 3:02 PM, Avri Doria <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:avri@acm.org" target="_blank"><avri@acm.org></a> wrote:
</pre>
                              <blockquote type="cite">
                                <pre>Do I understand correctly: according to this the President of ICANN has just agreed with the need for external oversight of ICANN, and unnamed other organizations, involved in governance/management of the Internet, just as long as it is multistakeholder?
</pre>
                              </blockquote>
                              <pre>It appears to be a significant effort to address Internet Governance 
challenges, including acceleration of the globalization of ICANN towards 
an environment in which all stakeholders (including all governments) can 
participate on an equal footing...
</pre>
                            </blockquote>
                            <br>
                            It puts civil society to shame in how timid
                            we, at large, have been in proposing similar
                            advances on the status quo.  (I have not
                            made much of a secret of the fact that I was
                            disappointed in the number of endorsements
                            that the Best Bits statement on enhanced
                            cooperation (<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                              href="http://bestbits.net/ec"
                              target="_blank">http://bestbits.net/ec</a>)
                            received, though in part I accept that this
                            was because the statement was simply too
                            long.)<br>
                            <br>
                            This has also, in one stroke, determined the
                            IGF's future.  Of course the writing has
                            been on the wall for the IGF for a while
                            now, but it has now officially become
                            irrelevant in terms of its larger role in
                            multi-stakeholder Internet governance as
                            originally anticipated in the Tunis Agenda. 
                            Of course it will continue to have a role as
                            a discussion forum, but the momentum for it
                            to fulfil a  larger role has moved
                            elsewhere.<br>
                            <br>
                            It also neutralises the effect of the old
                            guard of the technical community (ISOC
                            mainly) at the Working Group on Enhanced
                            Cooperation.  Whilst they can still oppose
                            meaningful implementation of enhanced
                            cooperation reforms, this opposition is now
                            utterly token and ineffectual.  With Brazil
                            (and ICANN!) having lost patience and
                            forging ahead regardless, this leaves anyone
                            arguing against reforms at the WGEC looking
                            silly and irrelevant. <br>
                            <br>
                            <div>-- <br>
                              <p style="font-size:9pt"><b>Dr Jeremy
                                  Malcolm<br>
                                  Senior Policy Officer<br>
                                  Consumers International | the global
                                  campaigning voice for consumers</b><br>
                                Office for Asia-Pacific and the Middle
                                East<br>
                                Lot 5-1 Wisma WIM, 7 Jalan Abang Haji
                                Openg, TTDI, 60000 Kuala Lumpur,
                                Malaysia<br>
                                Tel: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                                  href="tel:%2B60%203%207726%201599"
                                  value="+60377261599" target="_blank">+60
                                  3 7726 1599</a></p>
                              <p style="font-size:9pt">Explore our new
                                Resource Zone - the global consumer
                                movement knowledge hub | <a
                                  moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.consumersinternational.org/news-and-media/resource-zone"
                                  target="_blank">http://www.consumersinternational.org/news-and-media/resource-zone</a></p>
                              <p style="font-size:9pt">@Consumers_Int |
                                <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                                  href="http://www.consumersinternational.org"
                                  target="_blank">www.consumersinternational.org</a>
                                | <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                                  href="http://www.facebook.com/consumersinternational"
                                  target="_blank">www.facebook.com/consumersinternational</a></p>
                              <p
                                style="font-size:8pt;color:rgb(153,153,153)">Read
                                our <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                                  href="http://www.consumersinternational.org/email-confidentiality"
                                  target="_blank">email confidentiality
                                  notice</a>. Don't print this email
                                unless necessary.</p>
                              <p><strong><span style="color:red">WARNING</span></strong><span>:
                                  This email has not been encrypted. You
                                  are strongly recommended to enable PGP
                                  or S/MIME encryption at your end. For
                                  instructions, see <a
                                    moz-do-not-send="true"
                                    href="http://jere.my/l/8m"
                                    target="_blank">http://jere.my/l/8m</a>.</span></p>
                            </div>
                          </div>
                        </blockquote>
                      </div>
                    </blockquote>
                    <br>
                  </div>
                </div>
                <span class=""><font color="#888888">
                    <pre cols="72">-- 

Matthew Shears
Director and Representative
Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)
<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:mshears@cdt.org" target="_blank">mshears@cdt.org</a>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="tel:%2B44%20%280%29%20771%20247%202987" value="+447712472987" target="_blank">+44 (0) 771 247 2987</a>
Skype: mshears
</pre>
                  </font></span></div>
            </blockquote>
          </div>
          <br>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
------------------------------------------------------
anriette esterhuysen <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:anriette@apc.org">anriette@apc.org</a>
executive director, association for progressive communications
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.apc.org">www.apc.org</a>
po box 29755, melville 2109
south africa
tel/fax +27 11 726 1692</pre>
  </body>
</html>