<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0"><tr><td valign="top"><div>Hi Deborah <br />I would like to be included in the working group. <br />Many thanks <br />Shaila </div></td></tr></table> <div id="_origMsg_">
<div>
<br />
<div>
<div style="font-size:0.9em">
<hr size="1">
<b>
<span style="font-weight:bold">From:</span>
</b>
Marianne Franklin <m.i.franklin@gold.ac.uk>; <br>
<b>
<span style="font-weight:bold">To:</span>
</b>
Deborah Brown <deborah@accessnow.org>; <br>
<b>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Cc:</span>
</b>
bestbits@lists.bestbits.net <bestbits@lists.bestbits.net>; irp@lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org <irp@lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org>; <br>
<b>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Subject:</span>
</b>
Re: [IRPCoalition] [bestbits] Re: CS statement: DNI releases Fact
Sheet on PRISM, but the damage is already done <br>
<b>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Sent:</span>
</b>
Tue, Jun 18, 2013 11:10:58 AM <br>
</div>
<br>
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top">
HI Deborah<br>
<br>
Whilst I was advocated an open list for the last two petitions, I do
understand the need for a working group set up from here on in.
Please count me in along with Matthias. <br>
Anyone else from IRP interested? <br>
<br>
Thanks for moderating this. <br>
best<br>
MF<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 18/06/2013 05:37, Deborah Brown
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">Dear all,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Given that there is interest in following up on last week's
statement at the HRC from people on different lists and, as
Anriette pointed out, we'll probably want to work with
Geneva-based HR orgs that are not on these lists, I propose
taking this conversation off-list for now with everyone who
wants to be involved and regularly reporting back to all the
various lists. This would hopefully help minimize the email
traffic and cross posting. Additionally, a few people
expressed a preference for taking this off-list to facilitate
strategizing. I hope this approach sounds okay to everyone.
Please let me know if you object.
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>So far the following people have written saying that
they'd like to be included in this discussion moving forward
are: Allon, Anja, APC (Anriette and Joy), Joana, Matthias,
and Norbert. </div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>Is there anyone I missed? Anyone I should add?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Since the HRC session ended on Friday, we now have some
time to regroup, and consider a variety of ways to follow up
in-country and in Geneva. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>All the best, <br>
Deborah </div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 2:39 AM, Allon
Bar <span dir="ltr"><<a rel="nofollow"
ymailto="mailto:allon@allonbar.com" target="_blank" href="javascript:return">allon@allonbar.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div> Agreed. One idea may
be to bring the full force of this wide coalition of
organizations to the fore by drafting a single letter
appropriate for all countries that are possibly involved
in extracting surveillance data obtained through
indiscriminate means, and submit a localized version
(referencing that country) to each of the respective
governments, still bearing the signature of the group of
organizations.<br>
So this would utilize the solidarity of all for the
specific effect these actions have on citizens in another
country, 1) asking the government in question about its
involvement in a program as described above; 2) urging the
government to verify by what means information they
receive from another state has been obtained; 3) urging
the government to refrain from using information obtained
by means violating the human rights of its citizens; and
4) again underlining that also in its own conduct toward
its citizens the government is bound by human rights
principles as well as its own laws, protecting the
individual against intrusion by its government and
operating on a basis of presumed innocence.<br>
<br>
"Violations supported by you affect us all." <br>
<div>
<div class="h5"> <br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<div>On 6/12/13 2:34 AM, Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>The greatest impact in terms of advocacy in
this area, would be within governments as
commitments may be made in forums but the real
test is within nations, behind closed doors.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>The minute people get accustomed to minute
corrosions in principle, is the inevitable
expectation that basic tenets have fallen.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Advocacy must be two pronged, with more
emphasis on the In-country advocacy. With social
media, this should allow for greater awareness of
the public, strategic awareness raising and
campaigning and utilizing all tools available.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Sala<br>
<br>
Sent from my iPad</div>
<div><br>
On Jun 12, 2013, at 6:29 AM, Deborah Brown <<a rel="nofollow"
ymailto="mailto:deborah@accessnow.org" target="_blank" href="javascript:return"
>deborah@accessnow.org</a>>
wrote:<br>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">Dear all,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>The HRC statement (which is continuing to
attract sign on) makes three requests to the
Human Rights Council (pasted below). Is
anyone interested in starting a separate
thread (on- or off-list) about taking these
requests forward? In particular it would be
good to have Geneva-based people and those
with experience in advocacy at the HRC
involved, but of course all are welcome. I
think it would be good to do coordinated
outreach to governments and to follow up
with OHCHR, which already provided some
advice on crafting the recommendations. </div>
<div>
<ul>
<li>convening a special session to examine
this case</li>
<li>supporting a multistakeholder process
to implement the recommendation of Mr La
Rue that the Human Rights Committee
develop a new General Comment 16 on the
right to privacy in light of
technological advancements, and,</li>
<li>requesting the High Commissioner to
prepare a report that:</li>
<ul>
<li>formally asks states to report on
practices and laws in place on
surveillance and what corrective steps
will they will take to meet human
rights standards, and,</li>
<li>examines the implications of this
case in in the light of the Human
Rights Council endorsed United Nations
Guiding Principles on Business and
Human Rights, the “Protect, Respect
and Remedy” Framework of
A/HRC/RES/17/4.</li>
</ul>
</ul>
<div>Warm regards, <br>
Deborah </div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jun 11, 2013
at 1:03 PM, shaila mistry <span dir="ltr"><<a rel="nofollow"
ymailto="mailto:shailam@yahoo.com" target="_blank" href="javascript:return"
>shailam@yahoo.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div>
<div
style="font-size:10pt;font-family:arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">++1<br>
This is excellent <br>
Shaila<br>
<div><span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span
style="text-indent:0px;letter-spacing:normal;font-variant:normal;font-style:normal;font-weight:normal;line-height:normal;border-collapse:separate;text-transform:none;font-size:medium;white-space:normal;font-family:Helvetica;word-spacing:0px;"><span
style="text-indent:0px;letter-spacing:normal;font-variant:normal;font-style:normal;font-weight:normal;line-height:normal;border-collapse:separate;text-transform:none;font-size:medium;white-space:normal;font-family:Helvetica;word-spacing:0px;"></span></span><span
style="font-family:garamond, new york, times, serif;"></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal"
style="text-align:left;"><b><span
style="font-size:10pt;color:purple;">The
journey begins sooner than you
anticipate !</span></b></div>
<div class="MsoNormal"
style="text-align:left;"><b><span
style="font-size:10pt;color:purple;">.....................
the renaissance of composure !<br>
</span></b></div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div
style="font-family:arial, helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:10pt;">
<div style="font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt;">
<div dir="ltr">
<hr size="1"> <font
face="Arial"> <b><span
style="font-weight:bold;">From:</span></b>
Anriette Esterhuysen <<a rel="nofollow"
ymailto="mailto:anriette@apc.org" target="_blank" href="javascript:return"
>anriette@apc.org</a>><br>
<b><span
style="font-weight:bold;">To:</span></b>
Deborah Brown <<a rel="nofollow"
ymailto="mailto:deborah@accessnow.org" target="_blank" href="javascript:return"
>deborah@accessnow.org</a>>
<br>
<b><span
style="font-weight:bold;">Cc:</span></b>
<a rel="nofollow"
ymailto="mailto:bestbits@lists.bestbits.net" target="_blank" href="javascript:return"
>bestbits@lists.bestbits.net</a>;
"<a rel="nofollow"
ymailto="mailto:irp@lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org" target="_blank" href="javascript:return"
>irp@lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org</a>"
<<a rel="nofollow"
ymailto="mailto:irp@lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org" target="_blank" href="javascript:return">irp@lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org</a>>
<br>
<b><span
style="font-weight:bold;">Sent:</span></b>
Monday, June 10, 2013 3:56 AM<br>
<b><span
style="font-weight:bold;">Subject:</span></b>
Re: [IRPCoalition] [bestbits]
Re: CS statement: DNI releases
Fact Sheet on PRISM, but the
damage is already done<br>
</font> </div>
<div>
<div>
<div><br>
Dear all<br>
<br>
Here is the version that
will be read. We had to
shorten it so that it<br>
is within the 2 minutes
space we have.<br>
<br>
Anriette<br>
<br>
<br>
On 10/06/2013 12:36, Deborah
Brown wrote:<br>
> Thanks Joana!<br>
> Just a quick note to
explain that the statement
will be made on behalf of<br>
> APC because as an
ECOSOC accredited org they
are able to make
interventions<br>
> and have graciously
facilitated and contributed
this intervention. We have<br>
> asked the speaker from
HRW to take a look at the
the Best Bits link for the<br>
> current list of
signatories before reading
it at the afternoon session
1500<br>
> Geneva time, so she
will be able to say that she
is making the statement on<br>
> behalf of xx orgs from
around the world. So please
make sure you endorse<br>
> the statement at <a rel="nofollow"
target="_blank" href="http://bestbits.net/prism-nsa/"
>http://bestbits.net/prism-nsa/</a><br>
><br>
> I will begin adding
those of you who already
endorsed it, so look for a<br>
> confirmation email and
click the link.<br>
><br>
> Jeremy, can you fix the
layout and footnotes when
you have a chance?<br>
><br>
> Thanks to all of you
for helping to make this
happen in less than 24 hours<br>
> across many time zones.<br>
><br>
> Best,<br>
> Deborah<br>
><br>
><br>
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at
6:30 AM, Joana Varon <<a rel="nofollow"
ymailto="mailto:joana@varonferraz.com" target="_blank" href="javascript:return"
>joana@varonferraz.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
><br>
>> Dear Anriette and
all,<br>
>><br>
>> Thanks a lot for
all the work that has been
made in such a short period
of<br>
>> time. This was
amazing!<br>
>> Here is the link
for the next endorsements: <a rel="nofollow"
target="_blank" href="http://bestbits.net/prism-nsa/"
>http://bestbits.net/prism-nsa/</a><br>
>> Please, let's
spread it!<br>
>> best<br>
>> joana<br>
>><br>
>> --<br>
>><br>
>> Joana Varon Ferraz<br>
>> Centro de
Tecnologia e Sociedade
(CTS-FGV) <<a rel="nofollow"
target="_blank" href="http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts/"
>http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts/</a>><br>
>> @joana_varon<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> On Mon, Jun 10,
2013 at 11:19 AM, Anriette
Esterhuysen <<a rel="nofollow"
ymailto="mailto:anriette@apc.org" target="_blank" href="javascript:return"
>anriette@apc.org</a>>wrote:<br>
>><br>
>>> Dear all<br>
>>><br>
>>> Thanks for all
the inputs. We have tried
to include them all.<br>
>>><br>
>>> Here is the
final text that will be
uploaded to the HRC site and
read<br>
>>> later today by
Human Rights Watch on APC's
behalf. We have included<br>
>>> signatories as
available now. Deborah will
coordinate adding further<br>
>>> names.<br>
>>><br>
>>> Best<br>
>>><br>
>>> Anriette<br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> On 10/06/2013
11:40, Marianne Franklin
wrote:<br>
>>>> Dear all<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> +1 from me.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> MF<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> On
10/06/2013 10:37, parminder
wrote:<br>
>>>>> I
support this text by Joy...<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> On
Monday 10 June 2013 02:56
PM, joy wrote:<br>
>>>> Hi -
sharing some ideas that came
also from discussion with
Frank La<br>
>>>> Rue's
office and my suggested
edits relate to the last
para, the<br>
>>>> recommended
action to the Council: - I
think we have a 3 pronged<br>
>>>> approach to
the call to action which is
looking really good:<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> "We call on
the Human Rights Council to
act swiftly to prevent<br>
>>>> creation of
a global Internet based
surveillance system by:<br>
>>>> 1)
convening a special session
to examine this case 2)
supporting the<br>
>>>>
recommendation of Mr La Rue
that the Human Rights
Committee develop of<br>
>>>> a new
General Comment 16 on the
right to privacy in light of<br>
>>>>
technological advancements
and 3) requesting the High
Commissioner to<br>
>>>> prepare a
report a) formally asking
states to report on
practices and<br>
>>>> laws in
place on survellilance and
what corrective steps will
they<br>
>>>> willl take
to meet human rights
standards and b) examing the<br>
>>>>
implications of this case in
in the light of the Human
Rights Council<br>
>>>> endorsed
United Nations Guiding
Principles on Business and
Human<br>
>>>> Rights, the
"Protect, Respect and
Remedy" Framework of
A/HRC/RES/17/4.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Joy<br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> On
10/06/2013 8:47 p.m.,<br>
>>>> Joana Varon
wrote:<br>
>>>>> Sure,
Parminder. Lets remove
company names.<br>
>>>>> And
thanks for the
comprehension.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>>> On Mon,
Jun 10, 2013 at 9:38 AM,
parminder<br>
>>>> <<a rel="nofollow"
ymailto="mailto:parminder@itforchange.net" target="_blank" href="javascript:return"
>parminder@itforchange.net</a>
<mailto:<a rel="nofollow"
ymailto="mailto:parminder@itforchange.net" target="_blank" href="javascript:return"
>parminder@itforchange.net</a>>>
wrote:<br>
>>>><br>
>>>>> Hi
All<br>
>>>>> IT
for Change will endorse this
.... (There are some changes
I<br>
>>>> would have
liked to propose but due to
the urgency of the issue i<br>
>>>> would not
do it now. Certainly the
names of the companies
involved<br>
>>>> should have
not been mentioned in the
statement. Can we still do
it?.)<br>
>>>><br>
>>>>> I am
sure some of you may already
be in contact with him but
if<br>
>>>> not
Philippe Dam with Human
Rights Watch may be a useful
person to<br>
>>>> talk to on
this. i am cc-ing the email
to him. He is attending the
HR<br>
>>>> Council
meeting. Wonder if Joy is
still there?<br>
>>>><br>
>>>>>
Best, parminder<br>
>>>><br>
>>>>> On
Monday 10 June 2013 10:07
AM, Deborah Brown wrote:<br>
>>>>>>
Dear all,<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>
Here's a quick update on the
draft statement to the Human<br>
>>>> Rights
Council regarding the impact
of state surveillance on
human<br>
>>>> rights. The
draft statement is below. We
are currently reaching out
to<br>
>>>> Geneva
based orgs who might be able
to assist with delivery
(thanks<br>
>>>> Joy) and if
not we can still publish it
and do outreach.<br>
>>>>>>
Given the short timeframe,
can any further edits be
sent on<br>
>>>> this thread
in the next 3.5 hours? Then
I will post it to the Best<br>
>>>> Bits site
to facilitate endorsement.
In the meantime, if
organizations<br>
>>>> or
individuals feel comfortable
endorsing this draft, please
reply on<br>
>>>> this thread
and we can add your name
through the Best Bits system<br>
>>>> later. As a
reminder, this statement
would be part of a debate at
the<br>
>>>> HRC that
will take place at 15:00
Geneva time on Monday.
Though not<br>
>>>> ideal, this
was the best time frame we
could come up with for<br>
>>>>
facilitating input and sign
on.<br>
>>>>>>
Thanks to everyone who
worked on this over the last
12 hours<br>
>>>> and
apologies for any
shortcoming in the process
because of time<br>
>>>>
constraints. Looking forward
to more input and to working
together to<br>
>>>> get this
finalized.<br>
>>>>>>
Best,<br>
>>>>>>
Deborah<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>
Agenda item 8:/General
Debate/<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>
Civil Society Statement to
the Human Rights Council on
the<br>
>>>> impact of
State Surveillance on Human
Rights addressing the
PRISM/NSA<br>
>>> case<br>
>>>>>>
Thank you Mr. President. I
speak on behalf of ______<br>
>>>>
organizations from ___
countries, across ___
regions. This is a truly<br>
>>>> global
issue. We express strong
concern over recent
revelations of<br>
>>>>
surveillance of internet and
telephone communications of
US and non-US<br>
>>>> nationals
by the government of the
United States of America.
Equally<br>
>>>> concerning
is the provision of access
to the results of that<br>
>>>>
surveillance to other
governments such as the
United Kingdom, and the<br>
>>>> indication
of the possible complicity
of some of the globally
dominant<br>
>>>> US-based
Internet companies whose
services and reach are
universally<br>
>>>>
distributed. These
revelations raise the
appearance of, and may even<br>
>>>> suggest a
blatant and systematic
disregard for human rights
as<br>
>>>> articulated
in Articles 17 and 19 of the
International Covenant on<br>
>>>> Civil and
Political Rights (ICCPR), as
well as Articles 12 and 19
of<br>
>>>> the
Universal Declaration of
Human Rights.<br>
>>>>>>
Just last year the Council
unanimously adopted
Resolution 20/8,<br>
>>>> which
"Affirms that the same
rights that people have
offline must also<br>
>>>> be
protected online, in
particular freedom of
expression ..."[1] But<br>
>>>> during this
session the Special
Rapporteur on Freedom of
Expression<br>
>>>> reported
(A/HRC/23/40) worrying new
trends in state surveillance
of<br>
>>>>
communications with serious
implications for the
exercise of the human<br>
>>>> rights to
privacy and to freedom of
opinion and expression. The<br>
>>>> Special
Rapporteur notes that
inadequate and non-existent
legal<br>
>>>> frameworks
"create a fertile ground for
arbitrary and unlawful<br>
>>>>
infringements of the right
to privacy in communications
and,<br>
>>>>
consequently, also threaten
the protection of the right
to freedom of<br>
>>>> opinion and
expression". [2]<br>
>>>>>>
Affirmation of internet
rights and freedoms by
governments in<br>
>>>> the cross
regional statement on
freedom of expression and
the Internet<br>
>>>> is
important. But civil society
is extremely concerned that<br>
>>>> governments
supporting this statement
are not addressing, and in
fact<br>
>>>> are
ignoring, the recent serious
revelations about mass
surveillance<br>
>>>> in the
PRISM/NSA case. Although the
personal information
disclosed<br>
>>>> under this
programme is subject to the
oversight of the US Foreign<br>
>>>>
Intelligence Surveillance
Court (FISC), that court
sits in secret and<br>
>>>> has no
responsiblity for ensuring
the human rights of those
not<br>
>>>> subject to
US jurisdiction.<br>
>>>>>>
The introduction of
surveillance mechanisms into
the very heart<br>
>>>> of the data
streams of the globally
central service providers
storing<br>
>>>> and
communicating the majority
of the world's digital
communications<br>
>>>> is a
backward step for human
rights in the digital age.
As La Rue<br>
>>>> notes:
"This raises serious concern
with regard to the<br>
>>>>
extra-territorial commission
of human rights violations
and the<br>
>>>> inability
of individuals to know that
they might be subject to
foreign<br>
>>>>
surveillance, challenge
decisions with respect to
foreign<br>
>>>>
surveillance, or seek
remedies." An immediate
response is needed.<br>
>>>>>>
We call on companies that
are voluntary and
involuntary parties<br>
>>>> to the
violation of the fundamental
rights of their users
globally to<br>
>>>> immediately
suspend this practice. Such
action would uphold the
Human<br>
>>>> Rights
Council endorsed United
Nations Guiding Principles
on Business<br>
>>>> and Human
Rights, the "Protect,
Respect and Remedy"
Framework of<br>
>>>>
A/HRC/RES/17/4.<br>
>>>>>>
We call for protection of
those who have made these
violations<br>
>>>> public. As
Mr La Rue notes, laws "must
not be used to target<br>
>>>>
whistleblowers ... nor
should they hamper the
legitimate oversight of<br>
>>>> government
action by citizens." We urge
States protect those<br>
>>>>
whistleblowers involved in
this case and to support
their efforts to<br>
>>>> combat
violations of the
fundamental human rights of
all global<br>
>>>> citizens.
Whistleblowers play a
critical role in promoting<br>
>>>>
transparency and upholding
the human rights of all.<br>
>>>>>>
This recent case is a new
kind of human rights
violation<br>
>>>>
specifically relevant to the
Internet and one
foreshadowed in the<br>
>>>> Council's
2012 Expert Panel on Freedom
of Expression and the
Internet.<br>
>>>> We
therefore call on the Human
Rights Council to act
swiftly to<br>
>>>> prevent
creation of a global
Internet based surveillance
system. One<br>
>>>> action the
Council could take would be
to follow up the Expert
Panel<br>
>>>> by
convening a multistakeholder
process to support the
recommendation<br>
>>>> of Mr. La
Rue that the Human Rights
Committee develop a new
General<br>
>>>> Comment on
the right to privacy in
light of technological
advancements<br>
>>>>>>
[1]<br>
>>> <a rel="nofollow"
target="_blank" href="http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/RESOLUTION/GEN/G12/153/25/PDF/G1215325.pdf?OpenElement"
>http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/RESOLUTION/GEN/G12/153/25/PDF/G1215325.pdf?OpenElement</a><br>
>>>>>>
[2]<br>
>>> <a rel="nofollow"
target="_blank" href="http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/RegularSession/Session23/A.HRC.23.40_EN.pdf"
>http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/RegularSession/Session23/A.HRC.23.40_EN.pdf</a><br>
>>>>>>
ENDS<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 9:16
PM, Gene Kimmelman<br>
>>>> <<a rel="nofollow"
ymailto="mailto:genekimmelman@gmail.com" target="_blank" href="javascript:return"
>genekimmelman@gmail.com</a>
<mailto:<a rel="nofollow"
ymailto="mailto:genekimmelman@gmail.com" target="_blank" href="javascript:return"
>genekimmelman@gmail.com</a>>>
wrote:<br>
>>>>>>
I'm glad to see everyone
diving in on this. I have
only one<br>
>>>> overarching
issue to raise concerning
the framing of whatever
groups<br>
>>>> decide to
put out: I believe it would
be most powerful to
challenge<br>
>>>> both the US
Gvt. and companies to
explain how what they have
done<br>
>>>> does NOT
constitute human rights
violations, with specific
details<br>
>>>> to explain
their stance. I believe all
the language people are<br>
>>>> suggesting
can fit within this framing,
and put the burden on others<br>
>>>> to show how
our concerns are not
justified. This has more to
do with<br>
>>>> long-term
diplomatic impact that
anything else; the debate
will<br>
>>>> continue
and many of the facts will
probably never be made
public --<br>
>>>> but I think
it is a strategic advantage
for civil society to always
be<br>
>>>> calling for
transparency and basing its
conclusions on both what
facts<br>
>>>> are
presented, and what concerns
are not addressed by the
presentation<br>
>>>> of
convincing arguments/facts.<br>
>>>>>>
On Jun 9, 2013, at 8:50
PM, Jeremy Malcolm wrote:<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>
On 10/06/2013, at
12:47 AM, Deborah Brown<br>
>>>> <<a rel="nofollow"
ymailto="mailto:deborah@accessnow.org" target="_blank" href="javascript:return"
>deborah@accessnow.org</a>
<mailto:<a rel="nofollow"
ymailto="mailto:deborah@accessnow.org" target="_blank" href="javascript:return"
>deborah@accessnow.org</a>>>
wrote:<br>
>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>
In any case, we could
still work on a statement to
be<br>
>>>> released
around this discussion, or
later in the HRC session,
which<br>
>>>> ends this
week. Jeremy, have you had
the chance to work on an
outline?<br>
>>>> If not, I'm
happy to help start the
drafting process. My main
concern<br>
>>>> is whether
we have enough time for
significant participation
from a<br>
>>>> diversity
of groups so that this is
coming from a global
coalition.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>>>>>
Would it be OK if we
copy it from the pad to a
sign-on<br>
>>>> statement
on <a rel="nofollow"
target="_blank" href="http://bestbits.net"
>bestbits.net</a>
<<a rel="nofollow"
target="_blank" href="http://bestbits.net/"
>http://bestbits.net/</a>>
5 hours before the<br>
>>>> hearing?
Those who are working on the
pad can pre-endorse it
there.<br>
>>>> If 5 hours
ahead is not enough, then
I'll need to instruct
someone<br>
>>>> else on how
to do it earlier, because
I'll be in the air until
then.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>>>>>
--<br>
>>>>>>>
*Dr Jeremy Malcolm<br>
>>>>>>>
Senior Policy Officer<br>
>>>>>>>
Consumers
International | the global
campaigning voice for<br>
>>>> consumers*<br>
>>>>>>>
Office for
Asia-Pacific and the Middle
East<br>
>>>>>>>
Lot 5-1 Wisma WIM, 7
Jalan Abang Haji Openg,
TTDI, 60000<br>
>>>> Kuala
Lumpur, Malaysia<br>
>>>>>>>
Tel: <a rel="nofollow"
>+60 3 7726
1599</a>
<tel:%2B60%203%207726%201599><br>
>>>><br>
>>>>>>>
WCRD 2013 -- Consumer
Justice Now! | Consumer
Protection<br>
>>>> Map: <a rel="nofollow"
target="_blank" href="https://wcrd2013.crowdmap.com/main"
>https://wcrd2013.crowdmap.com/main
</a>| #wcrd2013<br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>>>>>
@Consumers_Int | <a rel="nofollow"
target="_blank" href="http://www.consumersinternational.org"
>www.consumersinternational.org</a><br>
>>>> <<a rel="nofollow"
target="_blank" href="http://www.consumersinternational.org/"
>http://www.consumersinternational.org/</a>>
|<br>
>>>> <a rel="nofollow"
target="_blank" href="http://www.facebook.com/consumersinternational"
>www.facebook.com/consumersinternational</a><br>
>>>> <<a rel="nofollow"
target="_blank" href="http://www.facebook.com/consumersinternational"
>http://www.facebook.com/consumersinternational</a>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>>>>>
Read our email
confidentiality notice<br>
>>>> <<a rel="nofollow"
target="_blank" href="http://www.consumersinternational.org/email-confidentiality"
>http://www.consumersinternational.org/email-confidentiality</a>>.
Don't<br>
>>>> print this
email unless necessary.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>>>>>
--<br>
>>>>>>>
You received this
message because you are
subscribed to<br>
>>>> the Google
Groups "Web We Want working
group" group.<br>
>>>>>>>
To unsubscribe from
this group and stop
receiving emails<br>
>>>> from it,
send an email to webwewant+<a rel="nofollow"
ymailto="mailto:unsubscribe@googlegroups.com" target="_blank" href="javascript:return"
>unsubscribe@googlegroups.com</a><br>
>>>> <mailto:<a rel="nofollow"
ymailto="mailto:webwewant%2B" target="_blank" href="javascript:return"
>webwewant+</a><a rel="nofollow"
ymailto="mailto:unsubscribe@googlegroups.com" target="_blank" href="javascript:return"
>unsubscribe@googlegroups.com</a>>.<br>
>>>>>>>
For more options,
visit<br>
>>>> <a rel="nofollow"
target="_blank" href="https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out"
>https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out</a>.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>
--<br>
>>>>>>
Deborah Brown<br>
>>>>>>
Policy Analyst<br>
>>>>>>
Access | <a rel="nofollow"
target="_blank" href="http://AccessNow.org"
>AccessNow.org</a><br>
>>>>>>
E. <a rel="nofollow"
ymailto="mailto:deborah@accessnow.org" target="_blank" href="javascript:return"
>deborah@accessnow.org</a>
<mailto:<a rel="nofollow"
ymailto="mailto:deborah@accessnow.org" target="_blank" href="javascript:return"
>deborah@accessnow.org</a>><br>
>>>>>>
@deblebrown<br>
>>>>>>
PGP 0x5EB4727D<br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>>> --<br>
>>>>> --<br>
>>>>> Joana
Varon Ferraz<br>
>>>>> Centro
de Tecnologia e Sociedade
(CTS-FGV)<br>
>>>>>
@joana_varon<br>
>>> --<br>
>>>
------------------------------------------------------<br>
>>> anriette
esterhuysen <a rel="nofollow"
ymailto="mailto:anriette@apc.org" target="_blank" href="javascript:return"
>anriette@apc.org</a><br>
>>> executive
director, association for
progressive communications<br>
>>> <a rel="nofollow"
target="_blank" href="http://www.apc.org"
>www.apc.org</a><br>
>>> po box 29755,
melville 2109<br>
>>> south africa<br>
>>> tel/fax <a rel="nofollow"
>+27 11 726
1692</a><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>>
_______________________________________________<br>
>>> IRP mailing
list<br>
>>> <a rel="nofollow"
ymailto="mailto:IRP@lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org" target="_blank" href="javascript:return"
>IRP@lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org</a><br>
>>> <a rel="nofollow"
target="_blank" href="http://lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/irp"
>http://lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/irp</a><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>><br>
>> --<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
><br>
<br>
-- <br>
------------------------------------------------------<br>
anriette esterhuysen <a rel="nofollow"
ymailto="mailto:anriette@apc.org" target="_blank" href="javascript:return"
>anriette@apc.org</a><br>
executive director,
association for progressive
communications<br>
<a rel="nofollow"
target="_blank" href="http://www.apc.org"
>www.apc.org</a><br>
po box 29755, melville 2109<br>
south africa<br>
tel/fax <a rel="nofollow"
>+27 11 726
1692</a><br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
IRP mailing list<br>
<a rel="nofollow"
ymailto="mailto:IRP@lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org" target="_blank" href="javascript:return"
>IRP@lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org</a><br>
<a rel="nofollow"
target="_blank" href="http://lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/irp"
>http://lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/irp</a><br>
<br>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<br clear="all">
<div><br>
</div>
-- <br>
<div
style="color:rgb(136,136,136);font-size:13px;"><font
face="garamond, serif">Deborah Brown</font></div>
<div
style="color:rgb(136,136,136);font-size:13px;"><font
face="garamond, serif">Policy Analyst</font></div>
<div
style="color:rgb(136,136,136);font-size:13px;"><font
face="garamond, serif">Access | <a rel="nofollow"
target="_blank" href="http://AccessNow.org"
>AccessNow.org</a></font></div>
<div
style="color:rgb(136,136,136);font-size:13px;"><font
face="garamond, serif">E. <a rel="nofollow"
ymailto="mailto:deborah@accessnow.org" target="_blank" href="javascript:return"
style="color:rgb(17,85,204);"
>deborah@accessnow.org</a></font></div>
<div
style="color:rgb(136,136,136);font-size:13px;"><font
face="garamond, serif">@deblebrown</font></div>
<div
style="color:rgb(136,136,136);font-size:13px;"><font
face="garamond, serif">PGP 0x5EB4727D</font></div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br>
<span>IRP mailing list</span><br>
<span><a rel="nofollow"
ymailto="mailto:IRP@lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org" target="_blank" href="javascript:return"
>IRP@lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org</a></span><br>
<span><a rel="nofollow"
target="_blank" href="http://lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/irp"
>http://lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/irp</a></span><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<fieldset></fieldset>
<br>
<pre>_______________________________________________
IRP mailing list
<a rel="nofollow" ymailto="mailto:IRP@lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org" target="_blank" href="javascript:return">IRP@lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org</a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/irp">http://lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/irp</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<br clear="all">
<div><br>
</div>
-- <br>
<div
style="color:rgb(136,136,136);font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);"><font
face="garamond, serif">Deborah Brown</font></div>
<div
style="color:rgb(136,136,136);font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);"><font
face="garamond, serif">Policy Analyst</font></div>
<div
style="color:rgb(136,136,136);font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);"><font
face="garamond, serif">Access | AccessNow.org</font></div>
<div
style="color:rgb(136,136,136);font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);"><font
face="garamond, serif">E. <a rel="nofollow"
ymailto="mailto:deborah@accessnow.org" target="_blank" href="javascript:return"
style="color:rgb(17,85,204);">deborah@accessnow.org</a></font></div>
<div
style="color:rgb(136,136,136);font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);"><font
face="garamond, serif">@deblebrown</font></div>
<div
style="color:rgb(136,136,136);font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);"><font
face="garamond, serif">PGP 0x5EB4727D</font></div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature">--
Dr Marianne Franklin
Reader
Convener: Global Media & Transnational Communications Program
Co-Chair Internet Rights & Principles Coalition (UN IGF)
Goldsmiths, University of London
Dept. of Media & Communications
New Cross, London SE14 6NW
Tel: +44 20 7919 7072
<a rel="nofollow" class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" ymailto="mailto:m.i.franklin@gold.ac.uk" target="_blank" href="javascript:return"><m.i.franklin@gold.ac.uk></a>
@GloComm
<a rel="nofollow" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" target="_blank" href="https://twitter.com/GloComm">https://twitter.com/GloComm</a>
<a rel="nofollow" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" target="_blank" href="http://www.gold.ac.uk/media-communications/staff/franklin/">http://www.gold.ac.uk/media-communications/staff/franklin/</a>
<a rel="nofollow" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" target="_blank" href="https://www.gold.ac.uk/pg/ma-global-media-transnational-communications/">https://www.gold.ac.uk/pg/ma-global-media-transnational-communications/</a>
<a rel="nofollow" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" target="_blank" href="http://www.internetrightsandprinciples.org">www.internetrightsandprinciples.org</a>
@netrights</pre>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>