<div dir="ltr"><div style>(+ Web We Want on the principle of keeping all lists copied on everything, even if that means some annoying cross-posting for some of us)</div>Good idea, Deborah. Please count us in - Anne and Karina. We are working on getting the contacts of all HRC member representatives together as Anriette suggested last week. <div>
Thanks</div><div>Anne</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Deborah Brown <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:deborah@accessnow.org" target="_blank">deborah@accessnow.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Dear all, <div><br></div><div>Given that there is interest in following up on last week's statement at the HRC from people on different lists and, as Anriette pointed out, we'll probably want to work with Geneva-based HR orgs that are not on these lists, I propose taking this conversation off-list for now with everyone who wants to be involved and regularly reporting back to all the various lists. This would hopefully help minimize the email traffic and cross posting. Additionally, a few people expressed a preference for taking this off-list to facilitate strategizing. I hope this approach sounds okay to everyone. Please let me know if you object. <div>
<br></div><div>So far the following people have written saying that they'd like to be included in this discussion moving forward are: Allon, Anja, APC (Anriette and Joy), Joana, Matthias, and Norbert. </div><div>
<br></div><div>Is there anyone I missed? Anyone I should add?</div><div><br></div><div>Since the HRC session ended on Friday, we now have some time to regroup, and consider a variety of ways to follow up in-country and in Geneva. </div>
<div><br></div><div>All the best, <br>Deborah </div></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 2:39 AM, Allon Bar <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:allon@allonbar.com" target="_blank">allon@allonbar.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Agreed. One idea may be to bring the full force of this wide
coalition of organizations to the fore by drafting a single letter
appropriate for all countries that are possibly involved in
extracting surveillance data obtained through indiscriminate means,
and submit a localized version (referencing that country) to each of
the respective governments, still bearing the signature of the group
of organizations.<br>
So this would utilize the solidarity of all for the specific effect
these actions have on citizens in another country, 1) asking the
government in question about its involvement in a program as
described above; 2) urging the government to verify by what means
information they receive from another state has been obtained; 3)
urging the government to refrain from using information obtained by
means violating the human rights of its citizens; and 4) again
underlining that also in its own conduct toward its citizens the
government is bound by human rights principles as well as its own
laws, protecting the individual against intrusion by its government
and operating on a basis of presumed innocence.<br>
<br>
"Violations supported by you affect us all." <br><div><div>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<div>On 6/12/13 2:34 AM, Salanieta
Tamanikaiwaimaro wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>The greatest impact in terms of advocacy in this area, would
be within governments as commitments may be made in forums but
the real test is within nations, behind closed doors.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>The minute people get accustomed to minute corrosions in
principle, is the inevitable expectation that basic tenets have
fallen.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Advocacy must be two pronged, with more emphasis on the
In-country advocacy. With social media, this should allow for
greater awareness of the public, strategic awareness raising and
campaigning and utilizing all tools available.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Sala<br>
<br>
Sent from my iPad</div>
<div><br>
On Jun 12, 2013, at 6:29 AM, Deborah Brown <<a href="mailto:deborah@accessnow.org" target="_blank">deborah@accessnow.org</a>>
wrote:<br>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">Dear all,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>The HRC statement (which is continuing to attract sign
on) makes three requests to the Human Rights Council
(pasted below). Is anyone interested in starting a
separate thread (on- or off-list) about taking these
requests forward? In particular it would be good to have
Geneva-based people and those with experience in advocacy
at the HRC involved, but of course all are welcome. I
think it would be good to do coordinated outreach to
governments and to follow up with OHCHR, which already
provided some advice on crafting the recommendations. </div>
<div>
<ul>
<li>convening a special session to examine this case</li>
<li>supporting a multistakeholder process to implement
the recommendation of Mr La Rue that the Human Rights
Committee develop a new General Comment 16 on the
right to privacy in light of technological
advancements, and,</li>
<li>requesting the High Commissioner to prepare a report
that:</li>
<ul>
<li>formally asks states to report on practices and
laws in place on surveillance and what corrective
steps will they will take to meet human rights
standards, and,</li>
<li>examines the implications of this case in in the
light of the Human Rights Council endorsed United
Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human
Rights, the “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework
of A/HRC/RES/17/4.</li>
</ul>
</ul>
<div>Warm regards, <br>
Deborah </div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 1:03 PM,
shaila mistry <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:shailam@yahoo.com" target="_blank">shailam@yahoo.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<div style="font-size:10pt;font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif">++1<br>
This is excellent <br>
Shaila<br>
<div><span></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span style="text-indent:0px;letter-spacing:normal;font-variant:normal;font-style:normal;font-weight:normal;line-height:normal;border-collapse:separate;text-transform:none;font-size:medium;white-space:normal;font-family:Helvetica;word-spacing:0px"><span style="text-indent:0px;letter-spacing:normal;font-variant:normal;font-style:normal;font-weight:normal;line-height:normal;border-collapse:separate;text-transform:none;font-size:medium;white-space:normal;font-family:Helvetica;word-spacing:0px"></span></span><span style="font-family:garamond,new york,times,serif"></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:left"><b><span style="font-size:10pt;color:purple">The
journey begins sooner than you anticipate !</span></b></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:left"><b><span style="font-size:10pt;color:purple">.....................
the renaissance of composure !<br>
</span></b></div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:10pt">
<div style="font-family:times new roman,new york,times,serif;font-size:12pt">
<div dir="ltr">
<hr size="1"> <font face="Arial"> <b><span style="font-weight:bold">From:</span></b>
Anriette Esterhuysen <<a href="mailto:anriette@apc.org" target="_blank">anriette@apc.org</a>><br>
<b><span style="font-weight:bold">To:</span></b>
Deborah Brown <<a href="mailto:deborah@accessnow.org" target="_blank">deborah@accessnow.org</a>>
<br>
<b><span style="font-weight:bold">Cc:</span></b>
<a href="mailto:bestbits@lists.bestbits.net" target="_blank">bestbits@lists.bestbits.net</a>;
"<a href="mailto:irp@lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org" target="_blank">irp@lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org</a>"
<<a href="mailto:irp@lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org" target="_blank">irp@lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org</a>>
<br>
<b><span style="font-weight:bold">Sent:</span></b>
Monday, June 10, 2013 3:56 AM<br>
<b><span style="font-weight:bold">Subject:</span></b>
Re: [IRPCoalition] [bestbits] Re: CS
statement: DNI releases Fact Sheet on PRISM,
but the damage is already done<br>
</font> </div>
<div>
<div>
<div><br>
Dear all<br>
<br>
Here is the version that will be read. We
had to shorten it so that it<br>
is within the 2 minutes space we have.<br>
<br>
Anriette<br>
<br>
<br>
On 10/06/2013 12:36, Deborah Brown wrote:<br>
> Thanks Joana!<br>
> Just a quick note to explain that the
statement will be made on behalf of<br>
> APC because as an ECOSOC accredited
org they are able to make interventions<br>
> and have graciously facilitated and
contributed this intervention. We have<br>
> asked the speaker from HRW to take a
look at the the Best Bits link for the<br>
> current list of signatories before
reading it at the afternoon session 1500<br>
> Geneva time, so she will be able to
say that she is making the statement on<br>
> behalf of xx orgs from around the
world. So please make sure you endorse<br>
> the statement at <a href="http://bestbits.net/prism-nsa/" target="_blank">http://bestbits.net/prism-nsa/</a><br>
><br>
> I will begin adding those of you who
already endorsed it, so look for a<br>
> confirmation email and click the
link.<br>
><br>
> Jeremy, can you fix the layout and
footnotes when you have a chance?<br>
><br>
> Thanks to all of you for helping to
make this happen in less than 24 hours<br>
> across many time zones.<br>
><br>
> Best,<br>
> Deborah<br>
><br>
><br>
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 6:30 AM,
Joana Varon <<a href="mailto:joana@varonferraz.com" target="_blank">joana@varonferraz.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
><br>
>> Dear Anriette and all,<br>
>><br>
>> Thanks a lot for all the work
that has been made in such a short period
of<br>
>> time. This was amazing!<br>
>> Here is the link for the next
endorsements: <a href="http://bestbits.net/prism-nsa/" target="_blank">http://bestbits.net/prism-nsa/</a><br>
>> Please, let's spread it!<br>
>> best<br>
>> joana<br>
>><br>
>> --<br>
>><br>
>> Joana Varon Ferraz<br>
>> Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade
(CTS-FGV) <<a href="http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts/" target="_blank">http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts/</a>><br>
>> @joana_varon<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:19 AM,
Anriette Esterhuysen <<a href="mailto:anriette@apc.org" target="_blank">anriette@apc.org</a>>wrote:<br>
>><br>
>>> Dear all<br>
>>><br>
>>> Thanks for all the inputs.
We have tried to include them all.<br>
>>><br>
>>> Here is the final text that
will be uploaded to the HRC site and read<br>
>>> later today by Human Rights
Watch on APC's behalf. We have included<br>
>>> signatories as available now.
Deborah will coordinate adding further<br>
>>> names.<br>
>>><br>
>>> Best<br>
>>><br>
>>> Anriette<br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> On 10/06/2013 11:40, Marianne
Franklin wrote:<br>
>>>> Dear all<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> +1 from me.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> MF<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> On 10/06/2013 10:37,
parminder wrote:<br>
>>>>> I support this text
by Joy...<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> On Monday 10 June
2013 02:56 PM, joy wrote:<br>
>>>> Hi - sharing some ideas
that came also from discussion with Frank
La<br>
>>>> Rue's office and my
suggested edits relate to the last para,
the<br>
>>>> recommended action to the
Council: - I think we have a 3 pronged<br>
>>>> approach to the call to
action which is looking really good:<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> "We call on the Human
Rights Council to act swiftly to prevent<br>
>>>> creation of a global
Internet based surveillance system by:<br>
>>>> 1) convening a special
session to examine this case 2) supporting
the<br>
>>>> recommendation of Mr La
Rue that the Human Rights Committee
develop of<br>
>>>> a new General Comment 16
on the right to privacy in light of<br>
>>>> technological
advancements and 3) requesting the High
Commissioner to<br>
>>>> prepare a report a)
formally asking states to report on
practices and<br>
>>>> laws in place on
survellilance and what corrective steps
will they<br>
>>>> willl take to meet human
rights standards and b) examing the<br>
>>>> implications of this case
in in the light of the Human Rights
Council<br>
>>>> endorsed United Nations
Guiding Principles on Business and Human<br>
>>>> Rights, the "Protect,
Respect and Remedy" Framework of
A/HRC/RES/17/4.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Joy<br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> On 10/06/2013 8:47 p.m.,<br>
>>>> Joana Varon wrote:<br>
>>>>> Sure, Parminder. Lets
remove company names.<br>
>>>>> And thanks for the
comprehension.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>>> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013
at 9:38 AM, parminder<br>
>>>> <<a href="mailto:parminder@itforchange.net" target="_blank">parminder@itforchange.net</a>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:parminder@itforchange.net" target="_blank">parminder@itforchange.net</a>>>
wrote:<br>
>>>><br>
>>>>> Hi All<br>
>>>>> IT for Change will
endorse this .... (There are some changes
I<br>
>>>> would have liked to
propose but due to the urgency of the
issue i<br>
>>>> would not do it now.
Certainly the names of the companies
involved<br>
>>>> should have not been
mentioned in the statement. Can we still
do it?.)<br>
>>>><br>
>>>>> I am sure some of
you may already be in contact with him but
if<br>
>>>> not Philippe Dam with
Human Rights Watch may be a useful person
to<br>
>>>> talk to on this. i am
cc-ing the email to him. He is attending
the HR<br>
>>>> Council meeting. Wonder
if Joy is still there?<br>
>>>><br>
>>>>> Best, parminder<br>
>>>><br>
>>>>> On Monday 10 June
2013 10:07 AM, Deborah Brown wrote:<br>
>>>>>> Dear all,<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> Here's a quick
update on the draft statement to the Human<br>
>>>> Rights Council regarding
the impact of state surveillance on human<br>
>>>> rights. The draft
statement is below. We are currently
reaching out to<br>
>>>> Geneva based orgs who
might be able to assist with delivery
(thanks<br>
>>>> Joy) and if not we can
still publish it and do outreach.<br>
>>>>>> Given the
short timeframe, can any further edits be
sent on<br>
>>>> this thread in the next
3.5 hours? Then I will post it to the Best<br>
>>>> Bits site to facilitate
endorsement. In the meantime, if
organizations<br>
>>>> or individuals feel
comfortable endorsing this draft, please
reply on<br>
>>>> this thread and we can
add your name through the Best Bits system<br>
>>>> later. As a reminder,
this statement would be part of a debate
at the<br>
>>>> HRC that will take place
at 15:00 Geneva time on Monday. Though not<br>
>>>> ideal, this was the best
time frame we could come up with for<br>
>>>> facilitating input and
sign on.<br>
>>>>>> Thanks to
everyone who worked on this over the last
12 hours<br>
>>>> and apologies for any
shortcoming in the process because of time<br>
>>>> constraints. Looking
forward to more input and to working
together to<br>
>>>> get this finalized.<br>
>>>>>> Best,<br>
>>>>>> Deborah<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> Agenda item
8:/General Debate/<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> Civil
Society Statement to the Human Rights
Council on the<br>
>>>> impact of State
Surveillance on Human Rights addressing
the PRISM/NSA<br>
>>> case<br>
>>>>>> Thank you Mr.
President. I speak on behalf of ______<br>
>>>> organizations from ___
countries, across ___ regions. This is a
truly<br>
>>>> global issue. We express
strong concern over recent revelations of<br>
>>>> surveillance of internet
and telephone communications of US and
non-US<br>
>>>> nationals by the
government of the United States of
America. Equally<br>
>>>> concerning is the
provision of access to the results of that<br>
>>>> surveillance to other
governments such as the United Kingdom,
and the<br>
>>>> indication of the
possible complicity of some of the
globally dominant<br>
>>>> US-based Internet
companies whose services and reach are
universally<br>
>>>> distributed. These
revelations raise the appearance of, and
may even<br>
>>>> suggest a blatant and
systematic disregard for human rights as<br>
>>>> articulated in Articles
17 and 19 of the International Covenant on<br>
>>>> Civil and Political
Rights (ICCPR), as well as Articles 12 and
19 of<br>
>>>> the Universal Declaration
of Human Rights.<br>
>>>>>> Just last year
the Council unanimously adopted Resolution
20/8,<br>
>>>> which "Affirms that the
same rights that people have offline must
also<br>
>>>> be protected online, in
particular freedom of expression ..."[1]
But<br>
>>>> during this session the
Special Rapporteur on Freedom of
Expression<br>
>>>> reported (A/HRC/23/40)
worrying new trends in state surveillance
of<br>
>>>> communications with
serious implications for the exercise of
the human<br>
>>>> rights to privacy and to
freedom of opinion and expression. The<br>
>>>> Special Rapporteur notes
that inadequate and non-existent legal<br>
>>>> frameworks "create a
fertile ground for arbitrary and unlawful<br>
>>>> infringements of the
right to privacy in communications and,<br>
>>>> consequently, also
threaten the protection of the right to
freedom of<br>
>>>> opinion and expression".
[2]<br>
>>>>>> Affirmation of
internet rights and freedoms by
governments in<br>
>>>> the cross regional
statement on freedom of expression and the
Internet<br>
>>>> is important. But civil
society is extremely concerned that<br>
>>>> governments supporting
this statement are not addressing, and in
fact<br>
>>>> are ignoring, the recent
serious revelations about mass
surveillance<br>
>>>> in the PRISM/NSA case.
Although the personal information
disclosed<br>
>>>> under this programme is
subject to the oversight of the US Foreign<br>
>>>> Intelligence Surveillance
Court (FISC), that court sits in secret
and<br>
>>>> has no responsiblity for
ensuring the human rights of those not<br>
>>>> subject to US
jurisdiction.<br>
>>>>>> The
introduction of surveillance mechanisms
into the very heart<br>
>>>> of the data streams of
the globally central service providers
storing<br>
>>>> and communicating the
majority of the world's digital
communications<br>
>>>> is a backward step for
human rights in the digital age. As La Rue<br>
>>>> notes: "This raises
serious concern with regard to the<br>
>>>> extra-territorial
commission of human rights violations and
the<br>
>>>> inability of individuals
to know that they might be subject to
foreign<br>
>>>> surveillance, challenge
decisions with respect to foreign<br>
>>>> surveillance, or seek
remedies." An immediate response is
needed.<br>
>>>>>> We call on
companies that are voluntary and
involuntary parties<br>
>>>> to the violation of the
fundamental rights of their users globally
to<br>
>>>> immediately suspend this
practice. Such action would uphold the
Human<br>
>>>> Rights Council endorsed
United Nations Guiding Principles on
Business<br>
>>>> and Human Rights, the
"Protect, Respect and Remedy" Framework of<br>
>>>> A/HRC/RES/17/4.<br>
>>>>>> We call for
protection of those who have made these
violations<br>
>>>> public. As Mr La Rue
notes, laws "must not be used to target<br>
>>>> whistleblowers ... nor
should they hamper the legitimate
oversight of<br>
>>>> government action by
citizens." We urge States protect those<br>
>>>> whistleblowers involved
in this case and to support their efforts
to<br>
>>>> combat violations of the
fundamental human rights of all global<br>
>>>> citizens. Whistleblowers
play a critical role in promoting<br>
>>>> transparency and
upholding the human rights of all.<br>
>>>>>> This recent
case is a new kind of human rights
violation<br>
>>>> specifically relevant to
the Internet and one foreshadowed in the<br>
>>>> Council's 2012 Expert
Panel on Freedom of Expression and the
Internet.<br>
>>>> We therefore call on the
Human Rights Council to act swiftly to<br>
>>>> prevent creation of a
global Internet based surveillance system.
One<br>
>>>> action the Council could
take would be to follow up the Expert
Panel<br>
>>>> by convening a
multistakeholder process to support the
recommendation<br>
>>>> of Mr. La Rue that the
Human Rights Committee develop a new
General<br>
>>>> Comment on the right to
privacy in light of technological
advancements<br>
>>>>>> [1]<br>
>>> <a href="http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/RESOLUTION/GEN/G12/153/25/PDF/G1215325.pdf?OpenElement" target="_blank">http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/RESOLUTION/GEN/G12/153/25/PDF/G1215325.pdf?OpenElement</a><br>
>>>>>> [2]<br>
>>> <a href="http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/RegularSession/Session23/A.HRC.23.40_EN.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/RegularSession/Session23/A.HRC.23.40_EN.pdf</a><br>
>>>>>> ENDS<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> On Sun, Jun 9,
2013 at 9:16 PM, Gene Kimmelman<br>
>>>> <<a href="mailto:genekimmelman@gmail.com" target="_blank">genekimmelman@gmail.com</a>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:genekimmelman@gmail.com" target="_blank">genekimmelman@gmail.com</a>>>
wrote:<br>
>>>>>> I'm glad
to see everyone diving in on this. I have
only one<br>
>>>> overarching issue to
raise concerning the framing of whatever
groups<br>
>>>> decide to put out: I
believe it would be most powerful to
challenge<br>
>>>> both the US Gvt. and
companies to explain how what they have
done<br>
>>>> does NOT constitute
human rights violations, with specific
details<br>
>>>> to explain their stance.
I believe all the language people are<br>
>>>> suggesting can fit within
this framing, and put the burden on others<br>
>>>> to show how our concerns
are not justified. This has more to do
with<br>
>>>> long-term diplomatic
impact that anything else; the debate will<br>
>>>> continue and many of the
facts will probably never be made public
--<br>
>>>> but I think it is a
strategic advantage for civil society to
always be<br>
>>>> calling for transparency
and basing its conclusions on both what
facts<br>
>>>> are presented, and what
concerns are not addressed by the
presentation<br>
>>>> of convincing
arguments/facts.<br>
>>>>>> On Jun 9,
2013, at 8:50 PM, Jeremy Malcolm wrote:<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>> On
10/06/2013, at 12:47 AM, Deborah Brown<br>
>>>> <<a href="mailto:deborah@accessnow.org" target="_blank">deborah@accessnow.org</a>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:deborah@accessnow.org" target="_blank">deborah@accessnow.org</a>>>
wrote:<br>
>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> In
any case, we could still work on a
statement to be<br>
>>>> released around this
discussion, or later in the HRC session,
which<br>
>>>> ends this week. Jeremy,
have you had the chance to work on an
outline?<br>
>>>> If not, I'm happy to help
start the drafting process. My main
concern<br>
>>>> is whether we have enough
time for significant participation from a<br>
>>>> diversity of groups so
that this is coming from a global
coalition.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>>>>> Would
it be OK if we copy it from the pad to a
sign-on<br>
>>>> statement on <a href="http://bestbits.net" target="_blank">bestbits.net</a> <<a href="http://bestbits.net/" target="_blank">http://bestbits.net/</a>>
5 hours before the<br>
>>>> hearing? Those who are
working on the pad can pre-endorse it
there.<br>
>>>> If 5 hours ahead is not
enough, then I'll need to instruct someone<br>
>>>> else on how to do it
earlier, because I'll be in the air until
then.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>>>>> --<br>
>>>>>>> *Dr
Jeremy Malcolm<br>
>>>>>>> Senior
Policy Officer<br>
>>>>>>>
Consumers International | the global
campaigning voice for<br>
>>>> consumers*<br>
>>>>>>> Office
for Asia-Pacific and the Middle East<br>
>>>>>>> Lot
5-1 Wisma WIM, 7 Jalan Abang Haji Openg,
TTDI, 60000<br>
>>>> Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia<br>
>>>>>>> Tel: <a href="tel:%2B60%203%207726%201599" value="+60377261599" target="_blank">+60
3 7726 1599</a>
<tel:%2B60%203%207726%201599><br>
>>>><br>
>>>>>>> WCRD
2013 -- Consumer Justice Now! | Consumer
Protection<br>
>>>> Map: <a href="https://wcrd2013.crowdmap.com/main" target="_blank">https://wcrd2013.crowdmap.com/main
</a>| #wcrd2013<br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>>>>>
@Consumers_Int | <a href="http://www.consumersinternational.org" target="_blank">www.consumersinternational.org</a><br>
>>>> <<a href="http://www.consumersinternational.org/" target="_blank">http://www.consumersinternational.org/</a>>
|<br>
>>>> <a href="http://www.facebook.com/consumersinternational" target="_blank">www.facebook.com/consumersinternational</a><br>
>>>> <<a href="http://www.facebook.com/consumersinternational" target="_blank">http://www.facebook.com/consumersinternational</a>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>>>>> Read
our email confidentiality notice<br>
>>>> <<a href="http://www.consumersinternational.org/email-confidentiality" target="_blank">http://www.consumersinternational.org/email-confidentiality</a>>.
Don't<br>
>>>> print this email unless
necessary.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>>>>> --<br>
>>>>>>> You
received this message because you are
subscribed to<br>
>>>> the Google Groups "Web We
Want working group" group.<br>
>>>>>>> To
unsubscribe from this group and stop
receiving emails<br>
>>>> from it, send an email to
webwewant+<a href="mailto:unsubscribe@googlegroups.com" target="_blank">unsubscribe@googlegroups.com</a><br>
>>>> <mailto:<a href="mailto:webwewant%2B" target="_blank">webwewant+</a><a href="mailto:unsubscribe@googlegroups.com" target="_blank">unsubscribe@googlegroups.com</a>>.<br>
>>>>>>> For
more options, visit<br>
>>>> <a href="https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out" target="_blank">https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out</a>.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> --<br>
>>>>>> Deborah Brown<br>
>>>>>> Policy Analyst<br>
>>>>>> Access | <a href="http://AccessNow.org" target="_blank">AccessNow.org</a><br>
>>>>>> E. <a href="mailto:deborah@accessnow.org" target="_blank">deborah@accessnow.org</a>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:deborah@accessnow.org" target="_blank">deborah@accessnow.org</a>><br>
>>>>>> @deblebrown<br>
>>>>>> PGP 0x5EB4727D<br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>>> --<br>
>>>>> --<br>
>>>>> Joana Varon Ferraz<br>
>>>>> Centro de Tecnologia
e Sociedade (CTS-FGV)<br>
>>>>> @joana_varon<br>
>>> --<br>
>>>
------------------------------------------------------<br>
>>> anriette esterhuysen <a href="mailto:anriette@apc.org" target="_blank">anriette@apc.org</a><br>
>>> executive director,
association for progressive communications<br>
>>> <a href="http://www.apc.org" target="_blank">www.apc.org</a><br>
>>> po box 29755, melville 2109<br>
>>> south africa<br>
>>> tel/fax <a href="tel:%2B27%2011%20726%201692" value="+27117261692" target="_blank">+27
11 726 1692</a><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>>
_______________________________________________<br>
>>> IRP mailing list<br>
>>> <a href="mailto:IRP@lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org" target="_blank">IRP@lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org</a><br>
>>> <a href="http://lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/irp" target="_blank">http://lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/irp</a><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>><br>
>> --<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
><br>
<br>
-- <br>
------------------------------------------------------<br>
anriette esterhuysen <a href="mailto:anriette@apc.org" target="_blank">anriette@apc.org</a><br>
executive director, association for
progressive communications<br>
<a href="http://www.apc.org" target="_blank">www.apc.org</a><br>
po box 29755, melville 2109<br>
south africa<br>
tel/fax <a href="tel:%2B27%2011%20726%201692" value="+27117261692" target="_blank">+27
11 726 1692</a><br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
IRP mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:IRP@lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org" target="_blank">IRP@lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/irp" target="_blank">http://lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/irp</a><br>
<br>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<br clear="all">
<div><br>
</div>
-- <br>
<div style="color:rgb(136,136,136);font-size:13px"><font face="garamond, serif">Deborah Brown</font></div>
<div style="color:rgb(136,136,136);font-size:13px"><font face="garamond, serif">Policy Analyst</font></div>
<div style="color:rgb(136,136,136);font-size:13px"><font face="garamond, serif">Access | <a href="http://AccessNow.org" target="_blank">AccessNow.org</a></font></div>
<div style="color:rgb(136,136,136);font-size:13px"><font face="garamond, serif">E. <a href="mailto:deborah@accessnow.org" style="color:rgb(17,85,204)" target="_blank">deborah@accessnow.org</a></font></div>
<div style="color:rgb(136,136,136);font-size:13px"><font face="garamond, serif">@deblebrown</font></div>
<div style="color:rgb(136,136,136);font-size:13px"><font face="garamond, serif">PGP 0x5EB4727D</font></div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br>
<span>IRP mailing list</span><br>
<span><a href="mailto:IRP@lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org" target="_blank">IRP@lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org</a></span><br>
<span><a href="http://lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/irp" target="_blank">http://lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/irp</a></span><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<fieldset></fieldset>
<br>
<pre>_______________________________________________
IRP mailing list
<a href="mailto:IRP@lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org" target="_blank">IRP@lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org</a>
<a href="http://lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/irp" target="_blank">http://lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/irp</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
</font></span></div></div></div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
</font></span></blockquote></div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div style="color:rgb(136,136,136);font-size:13px"><font face="garamond, serif">Deborah Brown</font></div>
<div style="color:rgb(136,136,136);font-size:13px">
<font face="garamond, serif">Policy Analyst</font></div><div style="color:rgb(136,136,136);font-size:13px"><font face="garamond, serif">Access | AccessNow.org</font></div><div style="color:rgb(136,136,136);font-size:13px">
<font face="garamond, serif">E. <a href="mailto:deborah@accessnow.org" style="color:rgb(17,85,204)" target="_blank">deborah@accessnow.org</a></font></div><div style="color:rgb(136,136,136);font-size:13px">
<font face="garamond, serif">@deblebrown</font></div><div style="color:rgb(136,136,136);font-size:13px"><font face="garamond, serif">PGP 0x5EB4727D</font></div>
</font></span></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>