<div dir="ltr"><div><div>There are some statutes that protect whistleblowers in some cases, but this is subject to interpretation and the scope of the particular whistleblower statute you are looking at. The lawyer I asked said it is further complicated by 'whistleblowing' against the nation (USA) and possible allegations of treason and terrorism (e.g. Bradley Manning/Wikileaks)<br>
<br></div>Most whistleblower protections seem to address employee whistleblowing or corporate fraud.<br><br></div><div>Do other countries besides the USA offer protections?<br><br></div><div>gp<br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra">
<br clear="all"><div><div dir="ltr"><span style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;line-height:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);display:inline!important;float:none">Ginger (Virginia) Paque</span><br style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;line-height:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px">
<span style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;line-height:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);display:inline!important;float:none">IG Programmes, DiploFoundation</span><br style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;line-height:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px">
<br style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;line-height:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px">
<font style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;line-height:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px" size="1"><i><b>The latest from Diplo...</b></i> </font><font style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;line-height:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px" size="1"><span style="border-collapse:separate;font-family:Helvetica"><span style="font-style:italic"><i><i>Upcoming online courses in Internet governance: Master in Contemporary Diplomacy with Internet Governance specialisation, Critical Internet Resources and Infrastructure, ICT Policy and Strategic Planning, and Privacy and Personal Data Protection. </i><i>Read more and apply at <a href="http://www.diplomacy.edu/courses" style="color:rgb(17,85,204)" target="_blank"><span style="color:rgb(35,71,162)">http://www.diplomacy.edu/courses</span></a></i></i></span></span></font><div>
<span style="font-family:arial;font-size:small"><span style="padding-right:16px;width:16px;height:16px"></span><span style="padding-right:16px;width:16px;height:16px"></span><span style="padding-right:16px;width:16px;height:16px"></span><div>
<i></i><br><span style="font-family:arial;font-size:small"><b><i><span style="font-size:10pt"></span></i></b></span></div></span></div></div></div>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 12 June 2013 11:47, Anriette Esterhuysen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:anriette@apc.org" target="_blank">anriette@apc.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Replying only to BestBits... the multiple messages are driving me round<br>
the bend.<br>
<br>
I support Joana on this, but understand the strategic considerations to.<br>
<br>
Is there any protection for whistleblowers in the US we can make<br>
reference to in this last paragraph? So that we can say that 'such<br>
protection should apply to whistleblowers in this case'?<br>
<br>
anriette<br>
<br>
<br>
On 12/06/2013 18:22, Joana Varon wrote:<br>
> I'm ok if we take the paragraph that Kevin and Carol mentioned out and<br>
> leave the last part of the final paragraph:<br>
><br>
> "We further call on the United States Congress to protect the<br>
> whistleblowers involved in this case and support their efforts to combat<br>
> these kinds of mass violations of the fundamental human rights of American<br>
> and foreign citizens.[9]"<br>
><br>
><br>
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Joana Varon <<a href="mailto:joana@varonferraz.com">joana@varonferraz.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
>> "So we need others to protect him from US.."<br>
>><br>
>> then, as International community, we need the US to know we support his<br>
>> protection, isnt it?<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Carolina Rossini <<br>
>> <a href="mailto:carolina.rossini@gmail.com">carolina.rossini@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>>> Joana, I agree with Kevin on this. We need action of the international<br>
>>> community to protect whistleblowers when they break a law in a certain<br>
>>> country when such action in favor of a bigger common good - and actually<br>
>>> public interest.<br>
>>> So we need others to protect him from US...I do not believe anything else<br>
>>> would work in this case.<br>
>>><br>
>>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Kevin Bankston <<a href="mailto:kbankston@cdt.org">kbankston@cdt.org</a>>wrote:<br>
>>><br>
>>>> Understood. But the audience has changed. There it was the HRC, where<br>
>>>> your point might have purchase. But if we are here addressing US<br>
>>>> policymakers, and we are, that's a context where even those who are<br>
>>>> staunchly on our side on the substance have had to condemn what Snowden did<br>
>>>> as a clear violation of the law.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> ____________________________________<br>
>>>> Kevin S. Bankston<br>
>>>> Senior Counsel and Free Expression Director<br>
>>>> Center for Democracy & Technology<br>
>>>> 1634 I St NW, Suite 1100<br>
>>>> Washington, DC 20006<br>
>>>> <a href="tel:202.407.8834" value="+12024078834">202.407.8834</a> direct<br>
>>>> <a href="tel:202.637.0968" value="+12026370968">202.637.0968</a> fax<br>
>>>> <a href="mailto:kbankston@cdt.org">kbankston@cdt.org</a><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Follow CDT on Twitter at @cendemtech<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> On Jun 12, 2013, at 12:02 PM, Joana Varon <<a href="mailto:joana@varonferraz.com">joana@varonferraz.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> As I've mentioned in the document:<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> I believe it is very important to express our concerns about the future<br>
>>>> of the whistleblowers in every single statement we make... I mean, the guy<br>
>>>> is in huge trouble.. all the efforts are welcome and protecting him is also<br>
>>>> part of our main points. That was expressed in a paragraph on our Statement<br>
>>>> to HRC and there were a few organizations that signed our statement to<br>
>>>> HCR particularly because we have mentioned this point.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Carolina Rossini <<br>
>>>> <a href="mailto:carolina.rossini@gmail.com">carolina.rossini@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>>>><br>
>>>>> + 1 on Kevin's comments<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Kevin Bankston <<a href="mailto:kbankston@cdt.org">kbankston@cdt.org</a>>wrote:<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>>> Sorry, used the old best bits list address, now using new one...<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> Kevin<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> On Jun 12, 2013, at 11:53 AM, Kevin Bankston <<a href="mailto:kbankston@cdt.org">kbankston@cdt.org</a>><br>
>>>>>> wrote:<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> I'm not sure how bestbits fell out of this thread--I thought bestbists<br>
>>>>>> was going to be the main channel for this discussion--so adding that list<br>
>>>>>> back into cc.<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> In addition to Carolina, I've also made some small tweaks and one big<br>
>>>>>> comment.<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> The tweaks:<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> 1) Changed "Some US-based Internet companies with global reach also<br>
>>>>>> seem to be *complicit* in these practices" to "participating". I am<br>
>>>>>> all for calling out "complicity" in cases like, e.g., AT&T's cooperation<br>
>>>>>> with the Bush-era program that operated without court approval (for the<br>
>>>>>> record, I'm one of the attorneys who brought cases against AT&T and the NSA<br>
>>>>>> over that program, while I was at EFF). But as far as we know now the<br>
>>>>>> companies participating currently are doing so under secret *order* of the<br>
>>>>>> FISA court and even if they had attempted to challenge those orders we<br>
>>>>>> would never know. So I'm less willing to tar with the "complicity" brush.<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> 2) Changed "Involved or affected companies *must* publish statistics"<br>
>>>>>> to "must *be allowed to*" publish statistics. Right now they are forbidden<br>
>>>>>> by law from doing so. So we should be asking USG to allow them to do so.<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> The one big comment, seconding Carolina's: I think that the paragraph<br>
>>>>>> focusing on whistleblowing is a politically dangerous distraction from the<br>
>>>>>> main point. We had the same discussion in the stopwathing.uscoalition--many people wanted to focus on Snowden--but after a lot of<br>
>>>>>> debate it was agreed that doing so would actually detract from what he is<br>
>>>>>> trying to accomplish. I think the same is true here.<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> Thanks,<br>
>>>>>> K<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> PS CDT will have a blog post up shortly praising the HRC statement and<br>
>>>>>> the Larue report and highlighting for a US audience the global human rights<br>
>>>>>> impact of this issue.<br>
>>>>>> ____________________________________<br>
>>>>>> Kevin S. Bankston<br>
>>>>>> Senior Counsel and Free Expression Director<br>
>>>>>> Center for Democracy & Technology<br>
>>>>>> 1634 I St NW, Suite 1100<br>
>>>>>> Washington, DC 20006<br>
>>>>>> <a href="tel:202.407.8834" value="+12024078834">202.407.8834</a> direct<br>
>>>>>> <a href="tel:202.637.0968" value="+12026370968">202.637.0968</a> fax<br>
>>>>>> <a href="mailto:kbankston@cdt.org">kbankston@cdt.org</a><br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> Follow CDT on Twitter at @cendemtech<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> On Jun 12, 2013, at 11:34 AM, Carolina Rossini <<br>
>>>>>> <a href="mailto:carolina.rossini@gmail.com">carolina.rossini@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> Hi all<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> I just talked to Gene, and we have some new inputs. Edits on the<br>
>>>>>> letter.<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> C<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Joana Varon <<a href="mailto:joana@varonferraz.com">joana@varonferraz.com</a>>wrote:<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>> Hi folks,<br>
>>>>>>> Great job! I'm adding some brackets.. if I might.<br>
>>>>>>> Shall we be delivering this in Tunis, next week? During the Freedom<br>
>>>>>>> Online Coalition meeting.<br>
>>>>>>> best<br>
>>>>>>> joana<br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Carolina Rossini <<br>
>>>>>>> <a href="mailto:carolina.rossini@gmail.com">carolina.rossini@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> Kevin,<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> Thank you for your inputs. However, do you think there is space to<br>
>>>>>>>> say - besides reforming such law - there was a overreaching of authority ?<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> C<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Kevin Bankston <<a href="mailto:kbankston@cdt.org">kbankston@cdt.org</a>>wrote:<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>> By then we might also have responses to Andrew Puddephatt's<br>
>>>>>>>>> questions.<br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>> I'm not sure how best to answer Andrew's questions; FISA is a<br>
>>>>>>>>> complex law. And to be clear, Section 215 of the PATRIOT Act was an<br>
>>>>>>>>> amendment to FISA's provision for court orders for records; not a separate<br>
>>>>>>>>> law. And the state secrets privilege is common law; there is no statute<br>
>>>>>>>>> for it. But I'll do my best!<br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>> To read Andrew's question as narrowly as possible so that I can<br>
>>>>>>>>> give a quick answer: In the context of foreign intelligence and terrorism<br>
>>>>>>>>> investigations, FISA regulates surveillance conducted inside the United<br>
>>>>>>>>> States, and acquisition of records from companies inside the United<br>
>>>>>>>>> States, and surveillance outside of the United States to the extent it<br>
>>>>>>>>> implicates United States person (i.e., citizens and naturalized permanent<br>
>>>>>>>>> residents); there is also the National Security Letter authority which is<br>
>>>>>>>>> an authority for the FBI to obtain records without going through the FISA<br>
>>>>>>>>> Court.<br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>> These authorities directly implicate the privacy of non-Americans<br>
>>>>>>>>> to the extent that 1) non-Americans may reside in the US, 2) non-Americans<br>
>>>>>>>>> communications will transit or be stored in facilities in the US, 3)<br>
>>>>>>>>> records about non-Americans will be stored by companies in the US.<br>
>>>>>>>>> Finally, it also implicates the privacy of non-Americans to the extent<br>
>>>>>>>>> that it does not at all regulate USG surveillance of non-Americans outside<br>
>>>>>>>>> of America.<br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>> FISA is at 18 USC 1801 et seq, in Chapter 36 of our US Code:<br>
>>>>>>>>> <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/chapter-36" target="_blank">http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/chapter-36</a><br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>> In most relevant part, Subchapter I deals with individual wiretaps<br>
>>>>>>>>> ("electronic surveillance"), II with secret physical searches, III with pen<br>
>>>>>>>>> registers and trap and trace devices (i.e. surveillance of metadata), IV<br>
>>>>>>>>> with records demands (now referred to as PATRIOT 215 orders since it was<br>
>>>>>>>>> significantly amended by that section of PATRIOT). Meanwhile, Subchapter<br>
>>>>>>>>> VI--added by the FISA Amendments Act (FAA) in 2008--provided the new and<br>
>>>>>>>>> seriously problematic authority to obtain year long orders authorizing<br>
>>>>>>>>> "programs" of non-individualized surveillance of communications where at<br>
>>>>>>>>> least one party to the communication is outside of the country, while also<br>
>>>>>>>>> allowing without any court authorization the interception of any<br>
>>>>>>>>> foreign-to-foreign communications transiting the US; that is the authority<br>
>>>>>>>>> under which PRISM is being used, as far as we best understand it.<br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>> Therefore and to be absolutely clear: amendment to these laws--and<br>
>>>>>>>>> especially a narrowing of the FAA--would SUBSTANTIALLY impact the privacy<br>
>>>>>>>>> of every non-American who uses modern communications networks and services,<br>
>>>>>>>>> especially those with facilities in the US. And the assistance of<br>
>>>>>>>>> international civil society will be critical in any effort to accomplish<br>
>>>>>>>>> such amendments. So--thank you all for what you've been doing!<br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>> Best,<br>
>>>>>>>>> Kevin<br>
>>>>>>>>> ____________________________________<br>
>>>>>>>>> Kevin S. Bankston<br>
>>>>>>>>> Senior Counsel and Free Expression Director<br>
>>>>>>>>> Center for Democracy & Technology<br>
>>>>>>>>> 1634 I St NW, Suite 1100<br>
>>>>>>>>> Washington, DC 20006<br>
>>>>>>>>> <a href="tel:202.407.8834" value="+12024078834">202.407.8834</a> direct<br>
>>>>>>>>> <a href="tel:202.637.0968" value="+12026370968">202.637.0968</a> fax<br>
>>>>>>>>> <a href="mailto:kbankston@cdt.org">kbankston@cdt.org</a><br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>> Follow CDT on Twitter at @cendemtech<br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>> On Jun 12, 2013, at 10:02 AM, Anriette Esterhuysen <<br>
>>>>>>>>> <a href="mailto:anriette@apc.org">anriette@apc.org</a>> wrote:<br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>> We need a clean copy.. but I am afraid I can't work on it today.<br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>> But thanks MIke and others who have given input. I would be happy<br>
>>>>>>>>> to let Joy and Jeremy clean up and give us a version to send tomorrow or<br>
>>>>>>>>> Friday.<br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>> By then we might also have responses to Andrew Puddephatt's<br>
>>>>>>>>> questions.<br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>> Anriette<br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>> On 12/06/2013 15:03, michael gurstein wrote:<br>
>>>>>>>>>> I`ve commented as well and also around all day...<br>
>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>> M<br>
>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----<br>
>>>>>>>>>> From: <a href="mailto:webwewant@googlegroups.com">webwewant@googlegroups.com</a> [<br>
>>>>>>>>> mailto:<a href="mailto:webwewant@googlegroups.com">webwewant@googlegroups.com</a> <<a href="mailto:webwewant@googlegroups.com">webwewant@googlegroups.com</a>>] On<br>
>>>>>>>>>> Behalf Of Anriette Esterhuysen<br>
>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 4:28 AM<br>
>>>>>>>>>> Cc: <a href="mailto:webwewant@googlegroups.com">webwewant@googlegroups.com</a>;<br>
>>>>>>>>> <a href="mailto:irp@lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org">irp@lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org</a><br>
>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [bestbits] International civil society letter to<br>
>>>>>>>>> Congress to<br>
>>>>>>>>>> follow up from HRC statement<br>
>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>> Great work. Thanks Joy and Jeremy . I have made some comments. Will<br>
>>>>>>>>> be<br>
>>>>>>>>> around all day if needed.<br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>> Anriette<br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>> On 12/06/2013 06:01, Jeremy Malcolm wrote:<br>
>>>>>>>>>> This follows on from a telephone call organised by the Web<br>
>>>>>>>>> Foundation<br>
>>>>>>>>>> yesterday, in which APC was asked to coordinate a civil society<br>
>>>>>>>>> letter<br>
>>>>>>>>>> to the US government from international organisations. That<br>
>>>>>>>>> letter<br>
>>>>>>>>>> would follow on from our joint statement to the Human Rights<br>
>>>>>>>>> Council,<br>
>>>>>>>>>> and we would invite Human Rights Watch and Privacy International<br>
>>>>>>>>> to<br>
>>>>>>>>>> participate in drafting. APC agreed to do this and suggested<br>
>>>>>>>>>> continuing to use Best Bits as the coordinating coalition.<br>
>>>>>>>>>> Here is the first rough draft of the text that Joy from APC and I<br>
>>>>>>>>> have<br>
>>>>>>>>>> begun to put together, which awaits your comments and<br>
>>>>>>>>> improvements:<br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>> <a href="http://igcaucus.org:9001/p/your_name_here" target="_blank">http://igcaucus.org:9001/p/your_name_here</a> (sorry for the dumb<br>
>>>>>>>>> URL)<br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>> Although I'm cc'ing the IRP and Web We Want lists, to avoid<br>
>>>>>>>>>> fragmentation of discussions on the text like happened<br>
>>>>>>>>> inadvertently<br>
>>>>>>>>>> last time, can I suggest, if nobody objects, that we centralise on<br>
>>>>>>>>>> this list, and that if you are not a member you can join at<br>
>>>>>>>>>> <a href="http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits" target="_blank">http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits</a>. To bring in<br>
>>>>>>>>> others, you<br>
>>>>>>>>>> can point them towards this list too.<br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>> ><br>
>>>>>>>>>> --<br>
>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the<br>
>>>>>>>>> Google Groups<br>
>>>>>>>>>> "Web We Want working group" group.<br>
>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,<br>
>>>>>>>>> send an<br>
>>>>>>>>>> email to <a href="mailto:webwewant%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com">webwewant+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com</a>.<br>
>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit <a href="https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out" target="_blank">https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out</a>.<br>
>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>> --<br>
>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------<br>
>>>>>>>>> anriette esterhuysen <a href="mailto:anriette@apc.org">anriette@apc.org</a><br>
>>>>>>>>> executive director, association for progressive communications<br>
>>>>>>>>> <a href="http://www.apc.org" target="_blank">www.apc.org</a><br>
>>>>>>>>> po box 29755, melville 2109<br>
>>>>>>>>> south africa<br>
>>>>>>>>> tel/fax <a href="tel:%2B27%2011%20726%201692" value="+27117261692">+27 11 726 1692</a><br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>> --<br>
>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google<br>
>>>>>>>>> Groups "Web We Want working group" group.<br>
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,<br>
>>>>>>>>> send an email to <a href="mailto:webwewant%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com">webwewant+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com</a>.<br>
>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit <a href="https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out" target="_blank">https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out</a>.<br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>> --<br>
>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google<br>
>>>>>>>>> Groups "Web We Want working group" group.<br>
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,<br>
>>>>>>>>> send an email to <a href="mailto:webwewant%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com">webwewant+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com</a>.<br>
>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit <a href="https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out" target="_blank">https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out</a>.<br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> --<br>
>>>>>>>> *Carolina Rossini*<br>
>>>>>>>> <a href="http://carolinarossini.net/" target="_blank">http://carolinarossini.net/</a><br>
>>>>>>>> <a href="tel:%2B%201%206176979389" value="+16176979389">+ 1 6176979389</a><br>
>>>>>>>> *<a href="mailto:carolina.rossini@gmail.com">carolina.rossini@gmail.com</a>*<br>
>>>>>>>> skype: carolrossini<br>
>>>>>>>> @carolinarossini<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> --<br>
>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google<br>
>>>>>>>> Groups "Web We Want working group" group.<br>
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,<br>
>>>>>>>> send an email to <a href="mailto:webwewant%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com">webwewant+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com</a>.<br>
>>>>>>>> For more options, visit <a href="https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out" target="_blank">https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out</a>.<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>> --<br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>> --<br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>> Joana Varon Ferraz<br>
>>>>>>> Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade (CTS-FGV)<<a href="http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts/" target="_blank">http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts/</a>><br>
>>>>>>> @joana_varon<br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> --<br>
>>>>>> *Carolina Rossini*<br>
>>>>>> <a href="http://carolinarossini.net/" target="_blank">http://carolinarossini.net/</a><br>
>>>>>> <a href="tel:%2B%201%206176979389" value="+16176979389">+ 1 6176979389</a><br>
>>>>>> *<a href="mailto:carolina.rossini@gmail.com">carolina.rossini@gmail.com</a>*<br>
>>>>>> skype: carolrossini<br>
>>>>>> @carolinarossini<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> --<br>
>>>>> *Carolina Rossini*<br>
>>>>> <a href="http://carolinarossini.net/" target="_blank">http://carolinarossini.net/</a><br>
>>>>> <a href="tel:%2B%201%206176979389" value="+16176979389">+ 1 6176979389</a><br>
>>>>> *<a href="mailto:carolina.rossini@gmail.com">carolina.rossini@gmail.com</a>*<br>
>>>>> skype: carolrossini<br>
>>>>> @carolinarossini<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> --<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> --<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Joana Varon Ferraz<br>
>>>> Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade (CTS-FGV)<<a href="http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts/" target="_blank">http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts/</a>><br>
>>>> @joana_varon<br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> --<br>
>>> *Carolina Rossini*<br>
>>> <a href="http://carolinarossini.net/" target="_blank">http://carolinarossini.net/</a><br>
>>> <a href="tel:%2B%201%206176979389" value="+16176979389">+ 1 6176979389</a><br>
>>> *<a href="mailto:carolina.rossini@gmail.com">carolina.rossini@gmail.com</a>*<br>
>>> skype: carolrossini<br>
>>> @carolinarossini<br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>><br>
>> --<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">>><br>
>> --<br>
>><br>
>> Joana Varon Ferraz<br>
>> Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade (CTS-FGV) <<a href="http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts/" target="_blank">http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts/</a>><br>
>> @joana_varon<br>
>><br>
><br>
><br>
<br>
--<br>
------------------------------------------------------<br>
anriette esterhuysen <a href="mailto:anriette@apc.org">anriette@apc.org</a><br>
executive director, association for progressive communications<br>
<a href="http://www.apc.org" target="_blank">www.apc.org</a><br>
po box 29755, melville 2109<br>
south africa<br>
tel/fax <a href="tel:%2B27%2011%20726%201692" value="+27117261692">+27 11 726 1692</a><br>
<br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br></div>