<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<br>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- <br>
Hash: SHA1 <br>
<br>
Exactly Nick- that is why the aim is to be as short as possible.<br>
At this stage also we are not sure that we cn get a slot - so it may
be limited to one para only that is read out - but the whole
statement can still be released<br>
best<br>
Joy<br>
On 10/06/2013 6:05 p.m., Nick Ashton-Hart wrote:<br>
<span style="white-space: pre;">><br>
> Dear Deborah,<br>
><br>
> As a point of information, I believe NGO statements are
limited to 2 minutes.<br>
><br>
> On 10 Jun 2013 06:37, "Deborah Brown"
<<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:deborah@accessnow.org">deborah@accessnow.org</a> <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:deborah@accessnow.org"><mailto:deborah@accessnow.org></a>>
wrote:<br>
><br>
> Dear all, <br>
><br>
> Here's a quick update on the draft statement to the Human
Rights Council regarding the impact of state surveillance on human
rights. The draft statement is below. We are currently reaching
out to Geneva based orgs who might be able to assist with delivery
(thanks Joy) and if not we can still publish it and do outreach. <br>
><br>
> Given the short timeframe, can any further edits be sent
on this thread in the next 3.5 hours? Then I will post it to the
Best Bits site to facilitate endorsement. In the meantime, if
organizations or individuals feel comfortable endorsing this
draft, please reply on this thread and we can add your name
through the Best Bits system later. As a reminder, this statement
would be part of a debate at the HRC that will take place at 15:00
Geneva time on Monday. Though not ideal, this was the best time
frame we could come up with for facilitating input and sign on.<br>
><br>
> Thanks to everyone who worked on this over the last 12
hours and apologies for any shortcoming in the process because of
time constraints. Looking forward to more input and to working
together to get this finalized.<br>
><br>
> Best, <br>
> Deborah <br>
><br>
> Agenda item 8:/General Debate/<br>
> <br>
> Civil Society Statement to the Human Rights Council on
the impact of State Surveillance on Human Rights addressing the
PRISM/NSA case<br>
><br>
> Thank you Mr. President. I speak on behalf of ______
organizations from ___ countries, across ___ regions. This is a
truly global issue. We express strong concern over recent
revelations of surveillance of internet and telephone
communications of US and non-US nationals by the government of the
United States of America. Equally concerning is the provision of
access to the results of that surveillance to other governments
such as the United Kingdom, and the indication of the possible
complicity of some of the globally dominant US-based Internet
companies whose services and reach are universally distributed.
These revelations raise the appearance of, and may even suggest a
blatant and systematic disregard for human rights as articulated
in Articles 17 and 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights (ICCPR), as well as Articles 12 and 19 of the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights.<br>
><br>
> Just last year the Council unanimously adopted Resolution
20/8, which "Affirms that the same rights that people have offline
must also be protected online, in particular freedom of expression
..."[1] But during this session the Special Rapporteur on Freedom
of Expression reported (A/HRC/23/40) worrying new trends in state
surveillance of communications with serious implications for the
exercise of the human rights to privacy and to freedom of opinion
and expression. The Special Rapporteur notes that inadequate and
non-existent legal frameworks "create a fertile ground for
arbitrary and unlawful infringements of the right to privacy in
communications and, consequently, also threaten the protection of
the right to freedom of opinion and expression". [2]<br>
><br>
> Affirmation of internet rights and freedoms by
governments in the cross regional statement on freedom of
expression and the Internet is important. But civil society is
extremely concerned that governments supporting this statement are
not addressing, and in fact are ignoring, the recent serious
revelations about mass surveillance in the PRISM/NSA case.
Although the personal information disclosed under this programme
is subject to the oversight of the US Foreign Intelligence
Surveillance Court (FISC), that court sits in secret and has no
responsiblity for ensuring the human rights of those not subject
to US jurisdiction.<br>
><br>
> The introduction of surveillance mechanisms into the very
heart of the data streams of the globally central service
providers storing and communicating the majority of the world's
digital communications is a backward step for human rights in the
digital age. As La Rue notes: "This raises serious concern with
regard to the extra-territorial commission of human rights
violations and the inability of individuals to know that they
might be subject to foreign surveillance, challenge decisions with
respect to foreign surveillance, or seek remedies." An immediate
response is needed.<br>
><br>
> We call on companies that are voluntary and involuntary
parties to the violation of the fundamental rights of their users
globally to immediately suspend this practice. Such action would
uphold the Human Rights Council endorsed United Nations Guiding
Principles on Business and Human Rights, the “Protect, Respect and
Remedy” Framework of A/HRC/RES/17/4.<br>
><br>
> We call for protection of those who have made these
violations public. As Mr La Rue notes, laws "must not be used to
target whistleblowers ... nor should they hamper the legitimate
oversight of government action by citizens." We urge States
protect those whistleblowers involved in this case and to support
their efforts to combat violations of the fundamental human rights
of all global citizens. Whistleblowers play a critical role in
promoting transparency and upholding the human rights of all. <br>
> <br>
> This recent case is a new kind of human rights violation
specifically relevant to the Internet and one foreshadowed in the
Council's 2012 Expert Panel on Freedom of Expression and the
Internet. We therefore call on the Human Rights Council to act
swiftly to prevent creation of a global Internet based
surveillance system. One action the Council could take would be to
follow up the Expert Panel by convening a multistakeholder process
to support the recommendation of Mr. La Rue that the Human Rights
Committee develop a new General Comment on the right to privacy
in light of technological advancements <br>
><br>
> [1]
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/RESOLUTION/GEN/G12/153/25/PDF/G1215325.pdf?OpenElement">http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/RESOLUTION/GEN/G12/153/25/PDF/G1215325.pdf?OpenElement</a><br>
><br>
> [2]
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/RegularSession/Session23/A.HRC.23.40_EN.pdf">http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/RegularSession/Session23/A.HRC.23.40_EN.pdf</a><br>
><br>
> ENDS<br>
><br>
><br>
> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Gene Kimmelman
<<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:genekimmelman@gmail.com">genekimmelman@gmail.com</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:genekimmelman@gmail.com"><mailto:genekimmelman@gmail.com></a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> I'm glad to see everyone diving in on this. I have
only one overarching issue to raise concerning the framing of
whatever groups decide to put out: I believe it would be most
powerful to challenge both the US Gvt. and companies to explain
how what they have done does NOT constitute human rights
violations, with specific details to explain their stance. I
believe all the language people are suggesting can fit within this
framing, and put the burden on others to show how our concerns are
not justified. This has more to do with long-term diplomatic
impact that anything else; the debate will continue and many of
the facts will probably never be made public -- but I think it is
a strategic advantage for civil society to always be calling for
transparency and basing its conclusions on both what facts are
presented, and what concerns are not addressed by the presentation
of convincing arguments/facts.<br>
> On Jun 9, 2013, at 8:50 PM, Jeremy Malcolm wrote:<br>
><br>
>> On 10/06/2013, at 12:47 AM, Deborah Brown
<<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:deborah@accessnow.org">deborah@accessnow.org</a> <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:deborah@accessnow.org"><mailto:deborah@accessnow.org></a>>
wrote:<br>
>><br>
>>> In any case, we could still work on a
statement to be released around this discussion, or later in the
HRC session, which ends this week. Jeremy, have you had the chance
to work on an outline? If not, I'm happy to help start the
drafting process. My main concern is whether we have enough time
for significant participation from a diversity of groups so that
this is coming from a global coalition. <br>
>><br>
>> Would it be OK if we copy it from the pad to a
sign-on statement on bestbits.net <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://bestbits.net/"><http://bestbits.net/></a> 5
hours before the hearing? Those who are working on the pad can
pre-endorse it there. If 5 hours ahead is not enough, then I'll
need to instruct someone else on how to do it earlier, because
I'll be in the air until then.<br>
>><br>
>> -- <br>
>><br>
>> *Dr Jeremy Malcolm<br>
>> Senior Policy Officer<br>
>> Consumers International | the global campaigning
voice for consumers*<br>
>> Office for Asia-Pacific and the Middle East<br>
>> Lot 5-1 Wisma WIM, 7 Jalan Abang Haji Openg,
TTDI, 60000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia<br>
>> Tel: +60 3 7726 1599
<tel:%2B60%203%207726%201599><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> WCRD 2013 – Consumer Justice Now! | Consumer
Protection Map: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://wcrd2013.crowdmap.com/main">https://wcrd2013.crowdmap.com/main</a> | #wcrd2013<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> @Consumers_Int | <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.consumersinternational.org">www.consumersinternational.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://www.consumersinternational.org/"><http://www.consumersinternational.org/></a> |
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.facebook.com/consumersinternational">www.facebook.com/consumersinternational</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://www.facebook.com/consumersinternational"><http://www.facebook.com/consumersinternational></a><br>
>><br>
>> Read our email confidentiality notice
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://www.consumersinternational.org/email-confidentiality"><http://www.consumersinternational.org/email-confidentiality></a>.
Don't print this email unless necessary.<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> -- <br>
>> You received this message because you are
subscribed to the Google Groups "Web We Want working group" group.<br>
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
emails from it, send an email to
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:webwewant+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com">webwewant+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:webwewant+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com"><mailto:webwewant+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com></a>.<br>
>> For more options, visit
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out">https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out</a>.<br>
>> <br>
>> <br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> -- <br>
> Deborah Brown<br>
> Policy Analyst<br>
> Access | AccessNow.org<br>
> E. <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:deborah@accessnow.org">deborah@accessnow.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:deborah@accessnow.org"><mailto:deborah@accessnow.org></a><br>
> @deblebrown<br>
> PGP 0x5EB4727D<br>
></span><br>
<br>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
<br>
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
<br>
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.enigmail.net/">http://www.enigmail.net/</a>
<br>
<br>
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRtW5sAAoJEA9zUGgfM+bq1U0IAI40InxuuyD+xa3qFjrwbnGo
<br>
2Da5aw+wcqXuzk85lzI+Zy7HnSY58bAbNVRLz422OERr2890zU8Ndua65pI+2NU4
<br>
vWVZwVfm9O+zulkrIP5zIHzBisza343jkxK5JQWaXk+MpDkx9ZjkqPGYKysZFnGM
<br>
Y352PL4uqU1EaeQRogjkOUPo0klu7gU5I88QkdQV31p8Sl0dLtRkeBnlX4QklfdW
<br>
JIk+O0/PWX0U+XGdRFwpc/fVB0rZ/XC1e3AiQ7WTqJguUFGkv9BFbWQ28G8weiiC
<br>
ChZGPFQDVvfihZrvtSR4j1iEvSn0NQ+gh/luSSvLtP9tPBq0a2nUgBDBdO45uPk=
<br>
=pNYm
<br>
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>